426rwhp @ 7psi
Just finished my next set of tuning after adding the new test pipes and fuel pump. I did a 426rwhp and 408 ft/lbs at 7psi. The printer was down at the shop so I will head up there and take a picture of the comp screen. I also did a quick test of 7.4 psi and it jumped me to 438 rwhp and 418 ft. lbs but i left my high boost at 7.
let me know when you a get a picture of the graph, we can compare mine at 7.5 PSI before the FCON. I made 436rwhp i think it was, but my torque was lower cause I had left it pretty damn rich in the mid-range. My torque was a 399.
-Charles
-Charles
let me know when you a get a picture of the graph, we can compare mine at 7.5 PSI before the FCON. I made 436rwhp i think it was, but my torque was lower cause I had left it pretty damn rich in the mid-range. My torque was a 399.
-Charles
-Charles
Sorry for the poor quality. I had to just take a pic of the screen. The red dot is my finger over the flash. Had to cover it because it was bouncing off the screen
I am too stupid to turn it off lol. Also when I find my cord to my cam corder I will post vids of the dynos from 6psi and up.. also a few races one including a Ford GT 40 late model.
This dyno and my other dynos were on 93 octance because that is the only fuel I can get my hands on without going broke
Dyno Sheet
I am too stupid to turn it off lol. Also when I find my cord to my cam corder I will post vids of the dynos from 6psi and up.. also a few races one including a Ford GT 40 late model.This dyno and my other dynos were on 93 octance because that is the only fuel I can get my hands on without going broke

Dyno Sheet
Last edited by ZainT; Sep 9, 2004 at 10:03 PM.
Trending Topics
Originally posted by ZainT
.........I will post vids of the dynos from 6psi and up.. also a few races one including a Ford GT 40 late model.
.........I will post vids of the dynos from 6psi and up.. also a few races one including a Ford GT 40 late model.
Doc
Originally posted by DrRick
do you mean the new Ford GT???? post that **** quick!!!!!!!
Doc
do you mean the new Ford GT???? post that **** quick!!!!!!!
Doc
see if you can get a better graph too, that one looks like its on a gameboy screen... cant see what the smoothing is either but its good to see the graph without it so you can read things.
Originally posted by phunk
see if you can get a better graph too, that one looks like its on a gameboy screen... cant see what the smoothing is either but its good to see the graph without it so you can read things.
see if you can get a better graph too, that one looks like its on a gameboy screen... cant see what the smoothing is either but its good to see the graph without it so you can read things.
Originally posted by cmeissen
what year is the gt 40?
what year is the gt 40?
Originally posted by phunk
see if you can get a better graph too, that one looks like its on a gameboy screen... cant see what the smoothing is either but its good to see the graph without it so you can read things.
see if you can get a better graph too, that one looks like its on a gameboy screen... cant see what the smoothing is either but its good to see the graph without it so you can read things.
I am not so sure that I would need to richen it out. She runs fine as is without any sort of detonation. Nor has she ever since I first gotten her with the TT kit and I have kept the same a/f ratio. but yes I do need a new fuel regulator so that I can install a return line. this single line fuel system is crap. I have one ordered just waiting for it to come in.
i always say better safe than sorry... there is not much power to be found going from 11.5 to 12.5, making 10hp or so. i like to keep things safe... im not sure how many people other than myself have over 5000 miles of 415+rwhp PURE ABUSE without a single engine problem? i keep it RICH.
to each their own.
to each their own.


