Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

426rwhp @ 7psi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 10:53 PM
  #1  
ZainT's Avatar
ZainT
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: STL, MO
Default 426rwhp @ 7psi

Just finished my next set of tuning after adding the new test pipes and fuel pump. I did a 426rwhp and 408 ft/lbs at 7psi. The printer was down at the shop so I will head up there and take a picture of the comp screen. I also did a quick test of 7.4 psi and it jumped me to 438 rwhp and 418 ft. lbs but i left my high boost at 7.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 11:15 PM
  #2  
EnthuZiast's Avatar
EnthuZiast
Guess whose back, back again...
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

IN CAR VID! PLEASE
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2004 | 12:46 AM
  #3  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

sounds dead on to me... good work!

-Charles
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2004 | 01:01 AM
  #4  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

let me know when you a get a picture of the graph, we can compare mine at 7.5 PSI before the FCON. I made 436rwhp i think it was, but my torque was lower cause I had left it pretty damn rich in the mid-range. My torque was a 399.

-Charles
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2004 | 01:01 AM
  #5  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

let me know when you a get a picture of the graph, we can compare mine at 7.5 PSI before the FCON. I made 436rwhp i think it was, but my torque was lower cause I had left it pretty damn rich in the mid-range. My torque was a 399.

-Charles
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2004 | 07:16 AM
  #6  
whosdady's Avatar
whosdady
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Default

Nice numbers...
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2004 | 09:44 PM
  #7  
ZainT's Avatar
ZainT
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: STL, MO
Default

Sorry for the poor quality. I had to just take a pic of the screen. The red dot is my finger over the flash. Had to cover it because it was bouncing off the screen I am too stupid to turn it off lol. Also when I find my cord to my cam corder I will post vids of the dynos from 6psi and up.. also a few races one including a Ford GT 40 late model.

This dyno and my other dynos were on 93 octance because that is the only fuel I can get my hands on without going broke


Dyno Sheet

Last edited by ZainT; Sep 9, 2004 at 10:03 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2004 | 10:33 PM
  #8  
DrRick's Avatar
DrRick
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: austin
Default

Originally posted by ZainT
.........I will post vids of the dynos from 6psi and up.. also a few races one including a Ford GT 40 late model.

do you mean the new Ford GT???? post that **** quick!!!!!!!


Doc
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2004 | 07:08 AM
  #9  
ZainT's Avatar
ZainT
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: STL, MO
Default

Originally posted by DrRick
do you mean the new Ford GT???? post that **** quick!!!!!!!


Doc
No, not the new new one. But the model before the one that just came out. You would be surprised, they really aren't that fast. It's the new ones that SCREAM!
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2004 | 07:18 AM
  #10  
Daking350z's Avatar
Daking350z
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
Default

I cant wait to see what the APS turns out when it comes!!!
Great numbers!!
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2004 | 09:18 AM
  #11  
zimbo's Avatar
zimbo
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 970
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

Great numbers! How much timing are you pulling?

--Steve
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2004 | 03:22 PM
  #12  
cmeissen's Avatar
cmeissen
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins. CO
Default

what year is the gt 40?
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2004 | 07:15 PM
  #13  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

too lean on top!!! get a return system and jack that base pressure!!

otherwise looks good.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2004 | 07:17 PM
  #14  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

see if you can get a better graph too, that one looks like its on a gameboy screen... cant see what the smoothing is either but its good to see the graph without it so you can read things.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #15  
350G's Avatar
350G
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, KY
Default

Can't view . . . it says "not authorized."
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 10:26 AM
  #16  
Z33Concept's Avatar
Z33Concept
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: South Saint Louis
Default

Originally posted by phunk
see if you can get a better graph too, that one looks like its on a gameboy screen... cant see what the smoothing is either but its good to see the graph without it so you can read things.
ROFLMAO LMAO Nice Dyno Numbers P
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 12:34 PM
  #17  
350Now's Avatar
350Now
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default

wow.. great numbers.. hopefully I can get those numbers but most likely will not see those since I have 91 craptane fuel here.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 02:39 PM
  #18  
ZainT's Avatar
ZainT
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: STL, MO
Default

Originally posted by cmeissen
what year is the gt 40?
Not sure of the year. It is the model before the most recent released one though.

Originally posted by phunk
see if you can get a better graph too, that one looks like its on a gameboy screen... cant see what the smoothing is either but its good to see the graph without it so you can read things.
well as I said before the printer was down so I had to take a picture of the computer screen. Why it looks so bad. oh yea and I did make the picture on gameboy color's mario paint :P

I am not so sure that I would need to richen it out. She runs fine as is without any sort of detonation. Nor has she ever since I first gotten her with the TT kit and I have kept the same a/f ratio. but yes I do need a new fuel regulator so that I can install a return line. this single line fuel system is crap. I have one ordered just waiting for it to come in.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 10:55 PM
  #19  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

i always say better safe than sorry... there is not much power to be found going from 11.5 to 12.5, making 10hp or so. i like to keep things safe... im not sure how many people other than myself have over 5000 miles of 415+rwhp PURE ABUSE without a single engine problem? i keep it RICH.

to each their own.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 07:31 AM
  #20  
ZainT's Avatar
ZainT
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: STL, MO
Default

yea I just finished my 6k mile test of the beast. still nothing going bad. (knocks on wood). the Z gods are with us
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:40 AM.