Notices
G35/G37 General discussion and news for Infiniti's G or for full Forums check out MyG37.com or G35Driver.com

Dyno comparison for G37 vs. Genesis

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 08:54 AM
  #1  
trebien's Avatar
trebien
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Default Dyno comparison for G37 vs. Genesis

I thought this was interesting... Edmunds took both cars to the same dyno (at different times, though).

The peak HP between 5 - 7k rpm are about the same... but the peak torque of the Hyundai is significantly better and flatter (about 20+ ft-lbs). I would bet a 370Z dyno would be almost the exact same as the G37 dyno. Interesting...

Hyundai Genesis:



G37 coupe in red (335i in blue):

Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 09:01 AM
  #2  
kham25's Avatar
kham25
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 16
From: NY/NJ
Default

What does this all mean!!! .. The HyundaI is a better car therefore i will buy one because it has a few more ponies up top

Its an ok looking car, but i would never buy one personally..
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #3  
Faboo's Avatar
Faboo
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
From: Buena Park
Default

those dynos are awkward......


the 335's turbo die way early
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 09:18 AM
  #4  
d1mon3k's Avatar
d1mon3k
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth
Default

I'd still take the Z
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 09:19 AM
  #5  
Zrated's Avatar
Zrated
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Look at the torque curve on the Genesis!

I wish the 3.7 had a curve like that.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 09:22 AM
  #6  
omegamanex's Avatar
omegamanex
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

the genesis has a 3.8L ...
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 09:22 AM
  #7  
blasian's Avatar
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 1
From: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Default

Originally Posted by Zrated
Look at the torque curve on the Genesis!

I wish the 3.7 had a curve like that.
That's kind of awkward. All of the shop dynos I've seen of the 3.7 have had a very flat tq curve.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 10:30 AM
  #8  
trebien's Avatar
trebien
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Default

Originally Posted by omegamanex
the genesis has a 3.8L ...
Compared to the 3.7 in the G37???

That's... let's see... only 2.7% more displacement? No big deal.


Bottom line, even though the G37 makes a little more power waayyy up top, the Genesis torque numbers are impressive.

I still don't want one, but it IS interesting... I have always said the new 3.7 liter was a let-down, considering VVEL and all the other goodies... HP is nice but the torque is uninspiring. Nissan needs to get to work on DFI, pronto.

For better comparison, the HP curve up top mimics the G37, but here is the Genesis Torque overlayed in green:
Attached Thumbnails Dyno comparison for G37 vs. Genesis-dyno_chart_500_2.jpg  

Last edited by trebien; Feb 27, 2009 at 10:32 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 11:23 AM
  #9  
captj3's Avatar
captj3
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Bch FL
Default

Doesn't the genesis have a V8 in it? That would give you the answer for the tq line being flatter dispite the displacement.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 11:25 AM
  #10  
trebien's Avatar
trebien
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Default

Originally Posted by captj3
Doesn't the genesis have a V8 in it? That would give you the answer for the tq line being flatter dispite the displacement.
Yes. And a rocket booster.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 07:28 PM
  #11  
KhanMan's Avatar
KhanMan
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood California
Default

The Sedan get an optional V8 the sedan gets the V6 as an option with a base I4 turbo.
Another dyno chart.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 10:10 PM
  #12  
skaterbasist's Avatar
skaterbasist
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by trebien
I thought this was interesting... Edmunds took both cars to the same dyno (at different times, though).

The peak HP between 5 - 7k rpm are about the same... but the peak torque of the Hyundai is significantly better and flatter (about 20+ ft-lbs). I would bet a 370Z dyno would be almost the exact same as the G37 dyno. Interesting...

Hyundai Genesis:



G37 coupe in red (335i in blue):

If you are comparing these two independent dyno's, its not a valid comparison.

Luckily, Edmunds did do a head-to-head dyno comparison chart shown below.

The VQ37VHR makes much better top-end power (where it matters in WOT acceleration). But the Hyundai 3.8 makes great low-end power which is great for DD. I find it a little suspicious though because the VQ37VHR has been proven over and over to have a flat torque line from 2500 to almost redline.


Last edited by skaterbasist; Feb 27, 2009 at 10:14 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2009 | 07:22 AM
  #13  
liven Z life's Avatar
liven Z life
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 398
Likes: 25
From: queensbury NY
Default

Originally Posted by captj3
Doesn't the genesis have a V8 in it? That would give you the answer for the tq line being flatter dispite the displacement.
the sedan does the coupe comes in a v6 or 14 turbo. if i bought one ide only buy the turbo. thats how all the tiburon guys switching over feel also
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2009 | 03:52 PM
  #14  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

ha ha - it's called dyno operator variance. All depends where you start recording the run versus when you put your foot down to the floor.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #15  
SniperHunter's Avatar
SniperHunter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

I love the Genesis sedan, but I think the coupe is disastrous. Does no one else think it looks like a Solara? And that sinking rear 1/4 window...disgusting.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2009 | 01:13 PM
  #16  
torquexrpm's Avatar
torquexrpm
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: california
Default

GUYS!!!
That is NOT a dyno of a Genesis Coupe!

The dyno clearly says its a 335i. As in a BMW 335i with twin turbos. Edmunds compared it on the dyno to the g37. They also did that with the g37 and genesis coupe , but that is not this dyno.
Did you guys really think the genesis with its naturally aspirated 3.8l would make 280 lb feet of torque at the rear wheels at 3000 rpm?

Last edited by torquexrpm; Sep 27, 2009 at 01:14 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2009 | 01:28 PM
  #17  
0jiggy0's Avatar
0jiggy0
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 13
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Reply
Old Sep 27, 2009 | 01:36 PM
  #18  
Mike Wazowski's Avatar
Mike Wazowski
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (113)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
Default

Originally Posted by torquexrpm
GUYS!!!
That is NOT a dyno of a Genesis Coupe!

The dyno clearly says its a 335i. As in a BMW 335i with twin turbos. Edmunds compared it on the dyno to the g37. They also did that with the g37 and genesis coupe , but that is not this dyno.
Did you guys really think the genesis with its naturally aspirated 3.8l would make 280 lb feet of torque at the rear wheels at 3000 rpm?
um, the first dyno is just not showing up due to probably being from the host site, since this was posted so long ago...

oh and here is the link to the missing dyno..... http://blogs.edmunds.com/straightlin...mb-555x351.jpg deleted by edmunds...

please pay attention to dates before bumping threads

Last edited by Mike Wazowski; Sep 27, 2009 at 01:39 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #19  
ndnboy9517's Avatar
ndnboy9517
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Lawrenceville New Jersey
Default

the bmw is always faster. comeone 1500 dollars on the twin tubo and youll be pushing 400+hp
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2009 | 04:30 AM
  #20  
Moncef's Avatar
Moncef
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 7
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by ndnboy9517
the bmw is always faster. comeone 1500 dollars on the twin tubo and youll be pushing 400+hp
RSX is teh fast though
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stevo Z
SoCal Marketplace
4
Oct 3, 2015 09:14 PM
_koubie_
Engine & Drivetrain
5
Sep 20, 2015 06:34 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:20 PM.