N/A dyno numbers KINETIX intake manifold
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Santa Ana, CA
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
N/A dyno numbers KINETIX intake manifold
Here are the dyno numbers for our new intake manifold.
These were taken on our bone stock 2003 350z with 19000 mileage.
This chart has smoothed SAE corrected numbers , and the car has 20" wheels with 255/35/20 tires
The stock numbers were taken back in january, with the middle dyno run used (threw out the highest and lowest)
Manifold middle run was also used (threw out highest and lowest)
Same dyno, same technician. The car has had less than 100 miles put on it between runs. Obviously on the same day would be ideal, so interpret the numbers how you want.
We were happy with the numbers, we dont think they absolutely blow away aftermarket plenum numbers, but we think it is another competitive option.
We really liked how much smoother the power was delivered compared to stock.
With more NA mods, this manifold may prove to perform even better, but only time and customer reviews will reveal those answers.
I have also listed on the dyno run, the gains at different rpm intervals.
Can someone host this pic? It always says I exceeded my quote whenever I try to post pics. I can email the dyno.
These were taken on our bone stock 2003 350z with 19000 mileage.
This chart has smoothed SAE corrected numbers , and the car has 20" wheels with 255/35/20 tires
The stock numbers were taken back in january, with the middle dyno run used (threw out the highest and lowest)
Manifold middle run was also used (threw out highest and lowest)
Same dyno, same technician. The car has had less than 100 miles put on it between runs. Obviously on the same day would be ideal, so interpret the numbers how you want.
We were happy with the numbers, we dont think they absolutely blow away aftermarket plenum numbers, but we think it is another competitive option.
We really liked how much smoother the power was delivered compared to stock.
With more NA mods, this manifold may prove to perform even better, but only time and customer reviews will reveal those answers.
I have also listed on the dyno run, the gains at different rpm intervals.
Can someone host this pic? It always says I exceeded my quote whenever I try to post pics. I can email the dyno.
#7
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Email it to me as well: reav@bellsouth.net
Cant you host this using imagestation? (http://www.imagestation.com/)
Cant you host this using imagestation? (http://www.imagestation.com/)
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Santa Ana, CA
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Phatmitzu, I just emailed them.
We think the numbers are impressive, but everyone's expectations are always different.
Some people are hoping it makes 20+ hp
Some are happy with less. We think it has GREAT area under the curve.
Also note that we ran it with an RPM increased to 7100, however the gains were all made in the normal rpm range of 6500 and below
We think the numbers are impressive, but everyone's expectations are always different.
Some people are hoping it makes 20+ hp
Some are happy with less. We think it has GREAT area under the curve.
Also note that we ran it with an RPM increased to 7100, however the gains were all made in the normal rpm range of 6500 and below
#13
Registered User
Robert... email the results to me at mcduckz@earthlink.net. I'm sure with Premier membership I can post the pic attachment up. I don't really care about NA numbers, but I know a lot of people want to see the dyno. I just want to get the GB moving!
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: University of Delaware
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts