Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

SSV worth the money?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 08:12 PM
  #21  
rolling's Avatar
rolling
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: Portland OR
Default

Originally Posted by ht4
If I remember correctly, kentix web site claims some fairly significant gains.
heh what website DOESN"t claim significant gains!!
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 08:34 PM
  #22  
Cannysage's Avatar
Cannysage
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,374
Likes: 1
From: SO_CAL
Default

they claim

+16 whp for NA
+35 whp for FI
if you don't feel the gains.. for those of you have it installed.. dunno what to tell ya. I'm going with a $300 spacers which will give me similar gains.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 02:34 AM
  #23  
Mike Wazowski's Avatar
Mike Wazowski
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (113)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
Default

Originally Posted by SCRoadster
'05 AT w/ SSV

283 hp
269 tq

Mods:

TS L-Spec flash
Nismo CAI
DC Headers
Crawford Cats
JIC Y-Pipe
Nismo Mid-Pipe & Muffler
UR Underdrive Pulley
so what was your baseline dyno without the SSV?
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 02:51 AM
  #24  
SCRoadster's Avatar
SCRoadster
New Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by USN HM 350Z
so what was your baseline dyno without the SSV?

269 hp
251 tq

w/ Crawford Cast Plenum

On Dynapack dyno
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 02:58 AM
  #25  
Mike Wazowski's Avatar
Mike Wazowski
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (113)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
Default

Originally Posted by SCRoadster
269 hp
251 tq

w/ Crawford Cast Plenum

On Dynapack dyno
so you are saying that the SSV made 14 whp and 18 TQ over a crawford on an NA car?
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 03:11 AM
  #26  
SCRoadster's Avatar
SCRoadster
New Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by USN HM 350Z
so you are saying that the SSV made 14 whp and 18 TQ over a crawford on an NA car?

Yes, those are the numbers that she produced after the SSV upgrade.
I had also installed a thermal manifold gasket during the upgrade.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 06:57 AM
  #27  
reyes5912's Avatar
reyes5912
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

14 whp & 18 lbs WOW
So anyone that has one, and is not happy with their SSV I'll buy it from you.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2005 | 06:45 AM
  #28  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

I figure (not saying its correct or anything) that with the average guy installing it, and not installing it absolutley perfectly..spacers= more room for error and more open seals ect. I'm not against spacers, i think they're very effective, its just one of the things i was thinking about before i got the ssv. I was actually about to get the 5/16th spacer but i figured i'd rather have the 1/2..then i figured if i get the 1/2 i'd need a strut bar...then if im gonna get the 1/2 and a strutbar, then i might as well get a polished crawford and a strutbar..and the price just kept shooting up lol.. I got sucked in by the mod bug. When i get it and install it, i'll let you know if theres any improvement (should get it this week... i ordered 11/11/05)

EDIT: btw since that guy gained like 16hp/18trq, i'm almost sure its due to his secondary mods. Kinda like synergistic..besides u can suck more air in if u can blow more air out.. a SSV on a stock car richens the af ratio..by adding hfc exhaust and such, it leans it out a bit more. You can get more gains thru that alone.

Last edited by plumpzz; Dec 10, 2005 at 06:48 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2005 | 08:05 AM
  #29  
Fairlady_z33's Avatar
Fairlady_z33
Registered User
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default

well we will see atleast for FI Gus is going to put one in his car right now he is making 401rwhp we will see what it makes when its on.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2005 | 08:10 AM
  #30  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

since hes FI it would only be fair if u included before dyno, after dyno w/ AF chart and a tune. If he was NA i wouldn't expect u to tune and dyno.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2005 | 08:15 AM
  #31  
RA11325's Avatar
RA11325
Banned
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SCRoadster
Yes, those are the numbers that she produced after the SSV upgrade.
I had also installed a thermal manifold gasket during the upgrade.

nice, way to shut up the crawford tools.


btw, i have the SSV as well and i love it. It produces more power throughout the band as opposed to a plenum or spacer according to the kinetix dyno and my butt dyno
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2005 | 08:46 AM
  #32  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

i wouldn't say they're tools.. theres just always something better. the price/hp ratio however is exponentiall decreasing as the price goes up. Crawfod is right in the middle..SSV is upper middle.. there are more radical and expensive designs (think topsecret..ect)
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 09:38 PM
  #33  
RA11325's Avatar
RA11325
Banned
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by plumpzz
i wouldn't say they're tools.. theres just always something better. the price/hp ratio however is exponentiall decreasing as the price goes up. Crawfod is right in the middle..SSV is upper middle.. there are more radical and expensive designs (think topsecret..ect)

I only call them tools because they rush into any thread that talks about a part (headers, manifold, etc) that isnt crawford.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 10:47 PM
  #34  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

lol okay theni guess that makes them tools. my SSV will be shipped thursday!
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 10:50 PM
  #35  
NOBI's Avatar
NOBI
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal
Default

Originally Posted by plumpzz

EDIT: btw since that guy gained like 16hp/18trq, i'm almost sure its due to his secondary mods. Kinda like synergistic..besides u can suck more air in if u can blow more air out.. a SSV on a stock car richens the af ratio..by adding hfc exhaust and such, it leans it out a bit more. You can get more gains thru that alone.
thats funny, a car at my shop with this manifold, headers, hight flow cats and nismo cat back made less hp than stock due to an excessivly lean mixture caused by the combination of mods and the stock ecu, not to say that if it were properly tuned it would pwn, as it looks like yours did after the reflash but from what we saw stock it failed miserably. that being said, this car is not your car so this could be an isolated case... something to consider before shelling out the hard earned dough though.

Last edited by NOBI; Dec 12, 2005 at 10:52 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 01:11 PM
  #36  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

Yeah that makes sense. Honestly I didnt get SSV as bolton power.. I know very well i need some kind of engine managment or tune, which is on its way
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
ablaine
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
51
Nov 29, 2016 10:13 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:40 AM.