Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

Kinetix plenum shoot out / Stock car / plus more

Old Aug 8, 2006 | 09:34 PM
  #21  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Silkk
I had JWT Intake and Tanabe Exhaust prior to my Kinetix V5 install.

I believe prior numbers were around 237whp, after numbers around 242whp, so it made power for me? I believe davidv was on hand that day to see the pull and dyno.
True. I remember the day and the numbers.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 09:51 PM
  #22  
350Zteve's Avatar
350Zteve
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 2
From: So. Cal.
Default

I wish you did this with a spacer as well
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 04:55 AM
  #23  
ACEMAN's Avatar
ACEMAN
Thread Starter
Master
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 2
From: Hagerstown MD
Default

Do you remember your TQ before and after??

The SSV does seem to make HP but lost TQ.

Later
Aceman

Originally Posted by Silkk
I had JWT Intake and Tanabe Exhaust prior to my Kinetix V5 install.

I believe prior numbers were around 237whp, after numbers around 242whp, so it made power for me? I believe davidv was on hand that day to see the pull and dyno.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 08:33 AM
  #24  
ACEMAN's Avatar
ACEMAN
Thread Starter
Master
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 2
From: Hagerstown MD
Default

Thanks Hydrazine

Maybe you could send me out your spacer and the ported lower plenum and i can throw that on there and see what it does

Later
Aceman


Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Great Job Aceman!

I know how much back breaking work it is doing a multi install on the dyno.... My back still hurts from the last dyno install.

I gotta give you a lot of credit for doing this. An aftermarket manufacturer must do this kind of stuff to survive. But spending your personal time and money to do this big of a test for public consumption is pretty cool.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 10:20 AM
  #25  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Of course Sungnam says the SSV is for FI-his only gains were mostly if not all from his Vortech tune and not the SSV-and he rocks SSV like lower than usual TQ numbers to boot. I love the guy who now say something like "well over 500hp the SSV would do better" Yeah whatever, its junk, when somebody proves it at the 500hp level, you'l start hearing "well its mostly for 700hp+ applications" LOL @ some people. Bump for the independent testing
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 10:22 AM
  #26  
eat rice z33's Avatar
eat rice z33
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 2
From: ct
Default

what ported lower plenum did you use? i want one haha!
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 10:23 AM
  #27  
ACEMAN's Avatar
ACEMAN
Thread Starter
Master
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 2
From: Hagerstown MD
Default

One that i ported myself

Later
Aceman

Originally Posted by eat rice z33
what ported lower plenum did you use? i want one haha!
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 10:36 AM
  #28  
turismo's Avatar
turismo
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,448
Likes: 0
From: curl lookin boy
Default

You need to consider what the manifold was intended for. There is only one design and it is for turbocharged applications. There are many factors that can play a role in determining the flow characteristics of the manifold. Ex. cams, head, boost, turbo, etc.... This test, although was a nice idea, shows me nothing since I am boosted.

To me, this is like dropping in a set of 8:5:1 compression pistons and comparing them to 10:5:1 and seeing what the result would be at 15psi.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 10:44 AM
  #29  
ACEMAN's Avatar
ACEMAN
Thread Starter
Master
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 2
From: Hagerstown MD
Default

Im sorry, but not to be rude.

This test was not done just for you

This test was done to see what it did on a NA car. I do not have FI and said nothing of FI in the post nor did i post it in the FI forum.

Thanks

Later
Aceman

Originally Posted by turismo
You need to consider what the manifold was intended for. There is only one design and it is for turbocharged applications. There are many factors that can play a role in determining the flow characteristics of the manifold. Ex. cams, head, boost, turbo, etc.... This test, although was a nice idea, shows me nothing since I am boosted.

To me, this is like dropping in a set of 8:5:1 compression pistons and comparing them to 10:5:1 and seeing what the result would be at 15psi.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 10:51 AM
  #30  
eat rice z33's Avatar
eat rice z33
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 2
From: ct
Default

aceman want to port my lower plenum?
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 10:55 AM
  #31  
G352NV's Avatar
G352NV
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 0
From: Sac
Default

I thought it was posted a long time ago it doesnt make power on a NA car.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 10:55 AM
  #32  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Kinetix claims decent gains on NA cars though, and this proves it loses power in this specific application. I have yet to see something like an exhaust ,test-pipes, or others plenums not work on NA and work on FI. If anything you'll see small gains NA, and much bigger gains FI, I wouldnt spend $800 on this thing, but to each his own.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 10:59 AM
  #33  
ACEMAN's Avatar
ACEMAN
Thread Starter
Master
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 2
From: Hagerstown MD
Default

Maybe it was posted, i never seen the post nor the dyno graph.

I like to see it for myself, rather than listen to the hear say. I dont live my life on hear say, i need facts.

And now i know.

Later
Aceman

Originally Posted by G352NV
I thought it was posted a long time ago it doesnt make power on a NA car.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 11:05 AM
  #34  
eat rice z33's Avatar
eat rice z33
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 2
From: ct
Default

hey aceman want to port my lower plenum? lol
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 11:10 AM
  #35  
E K's Avatar
E K
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Thank you for the dyno comparison. You wouldn't happen to have the actual dyno files for each run, would you?
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 11:13 AM
  #36  
ACEMAN's Avatar
ACEMAN
Thread Starter
Master
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 2
From: Hagerstown MD
Default

I do not have the files. MSP has them stored on their dynojet computer though im sure.

Originally Posted by E K
Thank you for the dyno comparison. You wouldn't happen to have the actual dyno files for each run, would you?
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 11:16 AM
  #37  
turismo's Avatar
turismo
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,448
Likes: 0
From: curl lookin boy
Default

Originally Posted by aceman
Im sorry, but not to be rude.

This test was not done just for you

This test was done to see what it did on a NA car. I do not have FI and said nothing of FI in the post nor did i post it in the FI forum.

Thanks

Later
Aceman

No hard feelings taken. I understand what you where trying to do. But this is iterated for the folks that claim no gains on FI, where no comparisons have been made.

Any gains that are made n/a will be quantified in FI. I don't care if it is 8-12hp. Just imagine what gains will be made with tuning and f/i. I can easinly see another 20-30hp.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 12:44 PM
  #38  
VandyZ's Avatar
VandyZ
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Just another option and reminder . . .

The latest crawford cast plenums have a larger opening for those of you running some sort of ported throttle body. While it does not make a world of difference, its better than the stock plenum opening, especially if you run the ported TB. If you are inclined to do some more dyno trials it would be interesting if you could find one to try. Needless to say we have done them, but nothing is better than private trials like these.

Oh and like aceman said if you increase your MAF tube your car will have issues . . . it took lots of trial and error with em ultimate to adapt a larger MAF housing.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 12:59 PM
  #39  
ACEMAN's Avatar
ACEMAN
Thread Starter
Master
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 2
From: Hagerstown MD
Default

Hey there Vandyz

What is the size of the opening on your plenum?

The Ported Throttle body i am using now is 2mm oversize at 72mm, with the inlet enlarged to 78mm.

And i would also like to get a larger MAF housing to see what kind of gains i could get out of using that. I do have the UTEC, so i believe i could get everything to work with time on the dyno

Thanks
Aceman

Originally Posted by VandyZ
Just another option and reminder . . .

The latest crawford cast plenums have a larger opening for those of you running some sort of ported throttle body. While it does not make a world of difference, its better than the stock plenum opening, especially if you run the ported TB. If you are inclined to do some more dyno trials it would be interesting if you could find one to try. Needless to say we have done them, but nothing is better than private trials like these.

Oh and like aceman said if you increase your MAF tube your car will have issues . . . it took lots of trial and error with em ultimate to adapt a larger MAF housing.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 04:45 PM
  #40  
ACEMAN's Avatar
ACEMAN
Thread Starter
Master
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 2
From: Hagerstown MD
Default Dyno overlay STOCK, V5 and SSV

The V5 did really well over stock with a nice gain through out the power band.

The SSV actually did worse than stock. If you look at the end of the dyno there is a blip which makes the SSV have higher HP. Which it did not, it was a error on the dyno.


STOCK = Blue
Kinetix V5 = RED
SSV = Green

Later
Aceman
Attached Thumbnails Kinetix plenum shoot out / Stock car / plus more-dsc01616.jpg  
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:54 PM.