Kinetix plenum shoot out / Stock car / plus more
Originally Posted by Silkk
I had JWT Intake and Tanabe Exhaust prior to my Kinetix V5 install.
I believe prior numbers were around 237whp, after numbers around 242whp, so it made power for me? I believe davidv was on hand that day to see the pull and dyno.
I believe prior numbers were around 237whp, after numbers around 242whp, so it made power for me? I believe davidv was on hand that day to see the pull and dyno.
Do you remember your TQ before and after??
The SSV does seem to make HP but lost TQ.
Later
Aceman
The SSV does seem to make HP but lost TQ.
Later
Aceman
Originally Posted by Silkk
I had JWT Intake and Tanabe Exhaust prior to my Kinetix V5 install.
I believe prior numbers were around 237whp, after numbers around 242whp, so it made power for me? I believe davidv was on hand that day to see the pull and dyno.
I believe prior numbers were around 237whp, after numbers around 242whp, so it made power for me? I believe davidv was on hand that day to see the pull and dyno.
Thanks Hydrazine 
Maybe you could send me out your spacer and the ported lower plenum and i can throw that on there and see what it does
Later
Aceman

Maybe you could send me out your spacer and the ported lower plenum and i can throw that on there and see what it does

Later
Aceman
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Great Job Aceman!
I know how much back breaking work it is doing a multi install on the dyno.... My back still hurts from the last dyno install.
I gotta give you a lot of credit for doing this. An aftermarket manufacturer must do this kind of stuff to survive. But spending your personal time and money to do this big of a test for public consumption is pretty cool.
I know how much back breaking work it is doing a multi install on the dyno.... My back still hurts from the last dyno install.
I gotta give you a lot of credit for doing this. An aftermarket manufacturer must do this kind of stuff to survive. But spending your personal time and money to do this big of a test for public consumption is pretty cool.
Of course Sungnam says the SSV is for FI-his only gains were mostly if not all from his Vortech tune and not the SSV-and he rocks SSV like lower than usual TQ numbers to boot. I love the guy who now say something like "well over 500hp the SSV would do better" Yeah whatever, its junk, when somebody proves it at the 500hp level, you'l start hearing "well its mostly for 700hp+ applications" LOL @ some people. Bump for the independent testing
You need to consider what the manifold was intended for. There is only one design and it is for turbocharged applications. There are many factors that can play a role in determining the flow characteristics of the manifold. Ex. cams, head, boost, turbo, etc.... This test, although was a nice idea, shows me nothing since I am boosted.
To me, this is like dropping in a set of 8:5:1 compression pistons and comparing them to 10:5:1 and seeing what the result would be at 15psi.
To me, this is like dropping in a set of 8:5:1 compression pistons and comparing them to 10:5:1 and seeing what the result would be at 15psi.
Im sorry, but not to be rude.
This test was not done just for you
This test was done to see what it did on a NA car. I do not have FI and said nothing of FI in the post nor did i post it in the FI forum.
Thanks
Later
Aceman
This test was not done just for you

This test was done to see what it did on a NA car. I do not have FI and said nothing of FI in the post nor did i post it in the FI forum.
Thanks
Later
Aceman
Originally Posted by turismo
You need to consider what the manifold was intended for. There is only one design and it is for turbocharged applications. There are many factors that can play a role in determining the flow characteristics of the manifold. Ex. cams, head, boost, turbo, etc.... This test, although was a nice idea, shows me nothing since I am boosted.
To me, this is like dropping in a set of 8:5:1 compression pistons and comparing them to 10:5:1 and seeing what the result would be at 15psi.
To me, this is like dropping in a set of 8:5:1 compression pistons and comparing them to 10:5:1 and seeing what the result would be at 15psi.
Kinetix claims decent gains on NA cars though, and this proves it loses power in this specific application. I have yet to see something like an exhaust ,test-pipes, or others plenums not work on NA and work on FI. If anything you'll see small gains NA, and much bigger gains FI, I wouldnt spend $800 on this thing, but to each his own.
Maybe it was posted, i never seen the post nor the dyno graph.
I like to see it for myself, rather than listen to the hear say. I dont live my life on hear say, i need facts.
And now i know.
Later
Aceman
I like to see it for myself, rather than listen to the hear say. I dont live my life on hear say, i need facts.
And now i know.
Later
Aceman
Originally Posted by G352NV
I thought it was posted a long time ago it doesnt make power on a NA car.
I do not have the files. MSP has them stored on their dynojet computer though im sure.
Originally Posted by E K
Thank you for the dyno comparison. You wouldn't happen to have the actual dyno files for each run, would you?
Originally Posted by aceman
Im sorry, but not to be rude.
This test was not done just for you
This test was done to see what it did on a NA car. I do not have FI and said nothing of FI in the post nor did i post it in the FI forum.
Thanks
Later
Aceman
This test was not done just for you

This test was done to see what it did on a NA car. I do not have FI and said nothing of FI in the post nor did i post it in the FI forum.
Thanks
Later
Aceman
No hard feelings taken. I understand what you where trying to do. But this is iterated for the folks that claim no gains on FI, where no comparisons have been made.
Any gains that are made n/a will be quantified in FI. I don't care if it is 8-12hp. Just imagine what gains will be made with tuning and f/i. I can easinly see another 20-30hp.
Just another option and reminder . . .
The latest crawford cast plenums have a larger opening for those of you running some sort of ported throttle body. While it does not make a world of difference, its better than the stock plenum opening, especially if you run the ported TB. If you are inclined to do some more dyno trials it would be interesting if you could find one to try. Needless to say we have done them, but nothing is better than private trials like these.
Oh and like aceman said if you increase your MAF tube your car will have issues . . . it took lots of trial and error with em ultimate to adapt a larger MAF housing.
The latest crawford cast plenums have a larger opening for those of you running some sort of ported throttle body. While it does not make a world of difference, its better than the stock plenum opening, especially if you run the ported TB. If you are inclined to do some more dyno trials it would be interesting if you could find one to try. Needless to say we have done them, but nothing is better than private trials like these.
Oh and like aceman said if you increase your MAF tube your car will have issues . . . it took lots of trial and error with em ultimate to adapt a larger MAF housing.
Hey there Vandyz
What is the size of the opening on your plenum?
The Ported Throttle body i am using now is 2mm oversize at 72mm, with the inlet enlarged to 78mm.
And i would also like to get a larger MAF housing to see what kind of gains i could get out of using that. I do have the UTEC, so i believe i could get everything to work with time on the dyno
Thanks
Aceman
What is the size of the opening on your plenum?
The Ported Throttle body i am using now is 2mm oversize at 72mm, with the inlet enlarged to 78mm.
And i would also like to get a larger MAF housing to see what kind of gains i could get out of using that. I do have the UTEC, so i believe i could get everything to work with time on the dyno

Thanks
Aceman
Originally Posted by VandyZ
Just another option and reminder . . .
The latest crawford cast plenums have a larger opening for those of you running some sort of ported throttle body. While it does not make a world of difference, its better than the stock plenum opening, especially if you run the ported TB. If you are inclined to do some more dyno trials it would be interesting if you could find one to try. Needless to say we have done them, but nothing is better than private trials like these.
Oh and like aceman said if you increase your MAF tube your car will have issues . . . it took lots of trial and error with em ultimate to adapt a larger MAF housing.
The latest crawford cast plenums have a larger opening for those of you running some sort of ported throttle body. While it does not make a world of difference, its better than the stock plenum opening, especially if you run the ported TB. If you are inclined to do some more dyno trials it would be interesting if you could find one to try. Needless to say we have done them, but nothing is better than private trials like these.
Oh and like aceman said if you increase your MAF tube your car will have issues . . . it took lots of trial and error with em ultimate to adapt a larger MAF housing.
The V5 did really well over stock with a nice gain through out the power band.
The SSV actually did worse than stock. If you look at the end of the dyno there is a blip which makes the SSV have higher HP. Which it did not, it was a error on the dyno.
STOCK = Blue
Kinetix V5 = RED
SSV = Green
Later
Aceman
The SSV actually did worse than stock. If you look at the end of the dyno there is a blip which makes the SSV have higher HP. Which it did not, it was a error on the dyno.
STOCK = Blue
Kinetix V5 = RED
SSV = Green
Later
Aceman



