Messing around since I have a ton of Driver Badges lol
11-24-2008 | 07:15 PM
#41
I believe society has a whole has a negative view on street racing because the action of doing so leads to fatalities in many cases. Marijuana has never killed anybody:
<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="never" allowNetworking="internal" height="60" width="468" data="http://www.norml.org/share/norml_02.swf">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" />
<param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" />
<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="never" allowNetworking="internal" height="60" width="468" data="http://www.norml.org/share/norml_02.swf">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" />
<param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" />
and if i made a banner that said alcohol never killed anyone would you believe me? a banner isn't actual proof. plus, i've already stated i'm unbiased on whether weed is legal/illegal whatever.
11-24-2008 | 07:25 PM
#42
I needed to take a hiatus from the car scene for a bit. However, it is great to be back and sharing with people who are part of the scene for the love of it!
LOL crazier than ever. I'm the same, just speaking out for what many people believe, but are afraid to be open about it publicly in fear of scrutiny.
11-24-2008 | 07:26 PM
#43
Lame and baseless statement. My banners and statements are resourced. Statistics don't lie. Do the research and compare. Where are your facts? Until then, I am done responding to nonsense.
Last edited by Rickdogg; 11-24-2008 at 10:20 PM.
11-24-2008 | 07:29 PM
#44
statistics can easily be configured to someone's liking. so you're saying there is no way possible to get cancer from smoking weed just the same as getting cancer from smoking cigarettes?
11-24-2008 | 07:40 PM
#45
Do some research:
http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6891
http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6917
http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6814
http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7503
http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6514
http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7241
http://blog.norml.org/tag/prostate-cancer/
<a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vbm9ybWwub3JnL2luZGV4LmNmbT9Hcm91cF9JRD03MDAy" target="_blank"><img src="http://norml.org/share/conditionsmap.jpg" alt="Potential Therapeutic Uses of Medical Marijuana" width="300" height="372" border="0" /></a>
Calling repost police:
Statistics don't lie. Do the research and compare. Where are your facts? Until then, I am done responding to nonsense.
Last edited by Rickdogg; 11-24-2008 at 07:48 PM.
11-24-2008 | 07:49 PM
#47
it's interesting that you're only resource is one that support legalization of marijuana. so duh they're not really going to want to discuss anything negative about marijuana since society already has the hype that it's oh so bad for you. even your own source stated:
"Chronic exposure to cannabis smoke has also been associated with the development of pre-cancerous changes in bronchial and epithelium cells in similar rates to tobacco smokers." so pretty much unless everybody uses this method:
"Cannabis consumers who desire the rapid onset of action associated with inhalation but who are concerned about the potential harms of noxious smoke can dramatically cut down on their intake of carcinogenic compounds by engaging in vaporization rather than smoking. Cannabis vaporization limits respiratory toxins by heating cannabis to a temperature where cannabinoid vapors form (typically around 180-190 degrees Celsius), but below the point of combustion where noxious smoke and associated toxins"
you can't completely eliminate smoking weed as a cause of cancer.
and yes, i only read the first article after i realized they were all from a biased source.
"Chronic exposure to cannabis smoke has also been associated with the development of pre-cancerous changes in bronchial and epithelium cells in similar rates to tobacco smokers." so pretty much unless everybody uses this method:
"Cannabis consumers who desire the rapid onset of action associated with inhalation but who are concerned about the potential harms of noxious smoke can dramatically cut down on their intake of carcinogenic compounds by engaging in vaporization rather than smoking. Cannabis vaporization limits respiratory toxins by heating cannabis to a temperature where cannabinoid vapors form (typically around 180-190 degrees Celsius), but below the point of combustion where noxious smoke and associated toxins"
you can't completely eliminate smoking weed as a cause of cancer.
and yes, i only read the first article after i realized they were all from a biased source.
11-24-2008 | 07:55 PM
#49
it's interesting that you're only resource is one that support legalization of marijuana. so duh they're not really going to want to discuss anything negative about marijuana since society already has the hype that it's oh so bad for you. even your own source stated:
"Chronic exposure to cannabis smoke has also been associated with the development of pre-cancerous changes in bronchial and epithelium cells in similar rates to tobacco smokers." so pretty much unless everybody uses this method:
"Cannabis consumers who desire the rapid onset of action associated with inhalation but who are concerned about the potential harms of noxious smoke can dramatically cut down on their intake of carcinogenic compounds by engaging in vaporization rather than smoking. Cannabis vaporization limits respiratory toxins by heating cannabis to a temperature where cannabinoid vapors form (typically around 180-190 degrees Celsius), but below the point of combustion where noxious smoke and associated toxins"
you can't completely eliminate smoking weed as a cause of cancer.
and yes, i only read the first article after i realized they were all from a biased source.
"Chronic exposure to cannabis smoke has also been associated with the development of pre-cancerous changes in bronchial and epithelium cells in similar rates to tobacco smokers." so pretty much unless everybody uses this method:
"Cannabis consumers who desire the rapid onset of action associated with inhalation but who are concerned about the potential harms of noxious smoke can dramatically cut down on their intake of carcinogenic compounds by engaging in vaporization rather than smoking. Cannabis vaporization limits respiratory toxins by heating cannabis to a temperature where cannabinoid vapors form (typically around 180-190 degrees Celsius), but below the point of combustion where noxious smoke and associated toxins"
you can't completely eliminate smoking weed as a cause of cancer.
and yes, i only read the first article after i realized they were all from a biased source.
NORML's articles are easily accessible and their resources within articles are solid, which is why I resourced them. I don't see the point in building a case from different angles if I am dealing with ignorance and laziness. If you showed some effort on retrieving facts and evidence supporting your case, I could respect that. Also, if you truly do not care then you wouldn't have posted in the first place.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YIQQuOgyyE4&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YIQQuOgyyE4&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Last edited by Rickdogg; 11-24-2008 at 09:51 PM.
11-24-2008 | 07:56 PM
#50
Never heard of anybody ODing or dieing from smoking weed.......hell some of my best friends smoke and still have productive lives. Some people like to drink, others like to smoke. Different strokes for different folks.
11-24-2008 | 08:23 PM
#52
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
From: Inland Empire
it's interesting that you're only resource is one that support legalization of marijuana. so duh they're not really going to want to discuss anything negative about marijuana since society already has the hype that it's oh so bad for you. even your own source stated:
"Chronic exposure to cannabis smoke has also been associated with the development of pre-cancerous changes in bronchial and epithelium cells in similar rates to tobacco smokers." so pretty much unless everybody uses this method:
"Cannabis consumers who desire the rapid onset of action associated with inhalation but who are concerned about the potential harms of noxious smoke can dramatically cut down on their intake of carcinogenic compounds by engaging in vaporization rather than smoking. Cannabis vaporization limits respiratory toxins by heating cannabis to a temperature where cannabinoid vapors form (typically around 180-190 degrees Celsius), but below the point of combustion where noxious smoke and associated toxins"
you can't completely eliminate smoking weed as a cause of cancer.
and yes, i only read the first article after i realized they were all from a biased source.
"Chronic exposure to cannabis smoke has also been associated with the development of pre-cancerous changes in bronchial and epithelium cells in similar rates to tobacco smokers." so pretty much unless everybody uses this method:
"Cannabis consumers who desire the rapid onset of action associated with inhalation but who are concerned about the potential harms of noxious smoke can dramatically cut down on their intake of carcinogenic compounds by engaging in vaporization rather than smoking. Cannabis vaporization limits respiratory toxins by heating cannabis to a temperature where cannabinoid vapors form (typically around 180-190 degrees Celsius), but below the point of combustion where noxious smoke and associated toxins"
you can't completely eliminate smoking weed as a cause of cancer.
and yes, i only read the first article after i realized they were all from a biased source.
11-24-2008 | 08:53 PM
#53
11-25-2008 | 02:08 AM
#54
have you ever smoked weed son? Weed isn't anything like opium(opiates i.e. herion), meth, crack, coke, and all the other hard drugs out there. The epic plant shouldn't even be considered a "drug" it's just a plant that naturally grows and u just pick off the buds and smoke it. Yeah, cocaine does come from a plant, but you have to make it in to powder form. Plus, no one has overdosed on weed and it doesn't f*ck up people's life like alcohol... if anything people should be worried about alcoholics then the pot heads.
11-25-2008 | 10:15 AM
#56
11-25-2008 | 10:41 AM
#57
Yeah, I have a friend and his dad smokes mary jane, during high school I would go over to their house everyday and smoke and occasionally smoke with his dad. They live a great life, I mean the dad drives a z06 for a DD? recently just bought the daughter a TL-s, bought the son a 04 STi, mom still drives the toyota 4 runner, and they live in a HUGE house....
I'm not sure if I'm right about this, but I believe THC eats cancer cells? That's why people that smoke ciggs and weed have a 30% chance of not getting cancer...
Rigg, when are you making more of those badges and when is the site openin?
I'm not sure if I'm right about this, but I believe THC eats cancer cells? That's why people that smoke ciggs and weed have a 30% chance of not getting cancer...
Rigg, when are you making more of those badges and when is the site openin?
11-25-2008 | 10:47 AM
#58
....will be launching in the middle of December. However the myspace page and blog is up now:
http://jdm420.blogspot.com/
http://www.myspace.com/jdmmaryjane
I'm working on the badges, stickers, clothing, custom shoes etc. Everything is just moving along so fast, it feels like a movie! haha I appreciate the support
Last edited by Rickdogg; 11-25-2008 at 11:09 AM.
11-25-2008 | 02:17 PM
#60