What do you do when you spot your... Grandma AND Grandpa grindin at the club?!?!
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (68)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 1
From: McDonalds - NOVA - DC/MD/VA
Originally Posted by 350ZTheStandard
Did you dance??? These are your words: at least everyone knew how to "get down." (post 1) So either you danced or you are not being honest with me, which one is it? I beleive everyone means all persons in attendance.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/everyone
eve·ry·one Audio Help /ˈɛvriˌwʌn, -wən/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ev-ree-wuhn, -wuhn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–pronoun every person; everybody.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/everyone
eve·ry·one Audio Help /ˈɛvriˌwʌn, -wən/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ev-ree-wuhn, -wuhn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–pronoun every person; everybody.
IF I happen to not know what "everybody" means, then you need to stop assuming vaguely used terms when presenting an argument; especially when the individual uses terms such as "get down." In this case, "get down" in the most basic simplest terms could mean dancing... but it could also mean enjoying your time whether that be drinking/dancing/socializing or any other means of past-time pleasures. I suppose making vague assumptions is something you do when you don't know what you're talking about? Don't worry, I know many of your kind, I usually refer them to Logic 101 courses offered at your nearby college campus. Notice "get down" was in quotes, left for interpretation. If everyone was actually dancing, I would specifically state "everybody was dancing." On that note, when reading the statement "Everyone knew how to get down," if one interprets that as dancing, does that mean everyone was actually dancing? Notice I used the word "at least everyone knew" indicating what they "knew" and not exactly what they actually did. Knowing and doing are two different aspects my son.One then might wonder how I knew. For example, I could have seen them dance before, I could have socialized with them and they could have told me they knew how to. I could have met these people before and with previous knowledge I knew they knew how to dance. OR I could have heard it from someone else at the bar that told me they knew how to dance. But to assume they were actually physically dancing is an invalid statement and your argument would not hold up in a court of law if this were to be presented in front of a jury.
Advice for future reference:
1. Do not attempt to formulate logical arguments when presented with vague terminology (ex. "get down")
2. Double check your reply for clear and concise valid statements. Fight logic with logic, not assumptions.
3. Shoot me a PM, I teach a course in this stuff. You'll ace the LSATs with ease. Always here to help =)
4. Remember: Knowledge is Power! Study my son
Originally Posted by abui01
^ 156 hairs to be exact! Shockingly awesome isnt it? 
-bsurdam, i'll spare him this round, LOL

-bsurdam, i'll spare him this round, LOL
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StreetStandard
Videos
2
Feb 4, 2016 09:44 AM
Dark Knight
Wheels Tires
7
Nov 11, 2015 08:40 PM
Subarism
East Canada
0
Sep 23, 2015 06:23 PM




