Raced a fully built WRX today
I raced a fully built WRX today which had a garrett GT-30 ballbearing turbo with the boost turned down to 6psi, and won
...it wasnt runnin at full potential (18psi), but hey, still a good feeling to beat a fully built car like that which dynoed at 270whp at the 6psi it was runnin on
...it wasnt runnin at full potential (18psi), but hey, still a good feeling to beat a fully built car like that which dynoed at 270whp at the 6psi it was runnin on
Last edited by MATIX; Apr 20, 2003 at 11:22 PM.
Originally posted by jester
How do they dyno AWD cars?
How do they dyno AWD cars?
Trending Topics
Originally posted by BriGuyMax
the most common way to dyno AWD cars is to disconnect the axle that goes to the rear wheels and dyno it like a FWD car. That's what all the guys with DSMs that I know do.
the most common way to dyno AWD cars is to disconnect the axle that goes to the rear wheels and dyno it like a FWD car. That's what all the guys with DSMs that I know do.
I may be putting too much thought in to this, really...lol
Originally posted by jester
Then wouldn't that give them a higher HP/TQ reading then what they would be making with all four wheels?
I may be putting too much thought in to this, really...lol
Then wouldn't that give them a higher HP/TQ reading then what they would be making with all four wheels?
I may be putting too much thought in to this, really...lol
Originally posted by 1.8troll
Dynoing that number on 6psi is VERY far fetched in not impossible. I suggest you check your numbers or your sources
Dynoing that number on 6psi is VERY far fetched in not impossible. I suggest you check your numbers or your sources
Originally posted by MATIX
whats so far fetched about that, my s14 dynoed 210 to hte wheels on 7psi pretty much stock with just a fuel pump, downpipe, and exhaust with the stock t25 turbo....I would think a fully built wrx with a GT-30 ball bearing turbo could make 270...
whats so far fetched about that, my s14 dynoed 210 to hte wheels on 7psi pretty much stock with just a fuel pump, downpipe, and exhaust with the stock t25 turbo....I would think a fully built wrx with a GT-30 ball bearing turbo could make 270...
Originally posted by MATIX
its a much larger turbo than the stock turbo, plus the car is fully built...at full boost (18psi) the car dynoed like 400hp or somethin close to that
its a much larger turbo than the stock turbo, plus the car is fully built...at full boost (18psi) the car dynoed like 400hp or somethin close to that
I am confused, I thought that the reason people got bigger turbos is to handle more boost, so whether the PSI was from a small turbo or large, it is still ONLY 6 psi (measured AFTER the turbo). My research with turbos is limited, but my wife has a modded Jetta 1.8t, and with the jetta, what I am talking about it how I understand it.
.
Originally posted by joeshow750
Well the reason 6 psi from one turbo can equal more hp than 6 psi from another turbo is effeciency. Effeciency refers to the change in air temp when "boosting" air. A smaller turbo will generally be less effecient because it has to work harder/spin faster than a larger turbo to create the same amount of boost. This extra turbulence causes the air temperature to be higher and in turn causes a loss of density. Of course we all know the benefits of cooler air. You are correct though, bigger turbos can handle more boost, generally. Smaller turbos, like the afore mentioned t-25, can make up to...oh, around 22 psi, but they are way over their rated effeciency at that point and pretty much stop gaining hp around 15-16 psi. At 22 psi it just becomes like a hair dryer and will cause detonation. On the other hand larger turbos may not hit their max effeciency rating until 22 psi. Those big diesel 18-wheeler trucks have giant turbos that hit max effeciency somewhere around 30 psi
.
Well the reason 6 psi from one turbo can equal more hp than 6 psi from another turbo is effeciency. Effeciency refers to the change in air temp when "boosting" air. A smaller turbo will generally be less effecient because it has to work harder/spin faster than a larger turbo to create the same amount of boost. This extra turbulence causes the air temperature to be higher and in turn causes a loss of density. Of course we all know the benefits of cooler air. You are correct though, bigger turbos can handle more boost, generally. Smaller turbos, like the afore mentioned t-25, can make up to...oh, around 22 psi, but they are way over their rated effeciency at that point and pretty much stop gaining hp around 15-16 psi. At 22 psi it just becomes like a hair dryer and will cause detonation. On the other hand larger turbos may not hit their max effeciency rating until 22 psi. Those big diesel 18-wheeler trucks have giant turbos that hit max effeciency somewhere around 30 psi
.
Ah I only wish they had a AWD dyno in hawaii. I also own a 03 WRX, and most of the WRX owners here dream of a AWD dyno. I guess thats one of the disadvantages of living on a rock in the middle of the ocean. LOL
Vishnu Tuning Dyno
On a recent trip there, my 02 WRX made around 215 whp and even with conservative drive line losses is close to 300 crank HP. This is with a stock turbo and 15 PSI (running CA's pee water for gas -- on 100 octane the ECU really ramps up the timing and I run 16.5 PSi and would not be surprised if my car made 15-20 more HP!). I see no reason to refute the earlier claim regarding the 'fully built WRX'. Really radical WRX examples roam the streets of LA. :-)
Now, driving my 350Z and WRX could not be more different. In fact since buying my Z a few weeks ago, I've only driven my WRX once -- it actually rained here in Los Angeles. :-)
BTW, for those with WRX or EVOs, Shiv Pathik of Vishnu Tuning is a great guy and personal friend. He is a very knowledgable engineer and recommend him highly for anything.
On a recent trip there, my 02 WRX made around 215 whp and even with conservative drive line losses is close to 300 crank HP. This is with a stock turbo and 15 PSI (running CA's pee water for gas -- on 100 octane the ECU really ramps up the timing and I run 16.5 PSi and would not be surprised if my car made 15-20 more HP!). I see no reason to refute the earlier claim regarding the 'fully built WRX'. Really radical WRX examples roam the streets of LA. :-)
Now, driving my 350Z and WRX could not be more different. In fact since buying my Z a few weeks ago, I've only driven my WRX once -- it actually rained here in Los Angeles. :-)
BTW, for those with WRX or EVOs, Shiv Pathik of Vishnu Tuning is a great guy and personal friend. He is a very knowledgable engineer and recommend him highly for anything.




