Notices
NA Builds Specifically for naturally aspirated builds & projects with Cams, Pistons Rods, Heads, Valves, etc

310 RWHP with stock intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2008, 05:29 PM
  #21  
marques1
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
marques1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: austin, texas
Posts: 5,097
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

lol, you fail really bad when it comes to computers. I hope you don't do your own tuning on your car, just joking kind of.
Old 08-25-2008, 05:32 PM
  #22  
mchris
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
mchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: mass
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The long intake is to build as much volume between the throttle body and the restrictor to give yourself an air reserve. It also helps to keep it from stalling on quick throttle changes. Now then, that said, a IR short runner manifold will give crisper throttle response. I have one of those also but it was too difficult to package with the SIR.
Chris
Old 08-25-2008, 05:46 PM
  #23  
Jay'Z
Banned
iTrader: (118)
 
Jay'Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Carbon Fiber, TX
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Faiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil!!
Old 08-25-2008, 05:54 PM
  #24  
LILjiMMYj0NES
Banned
 
LILjiMMYj0NES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Still dont see 8k.
Old 08-25-2008, 05:55 PM
  #25  
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Nexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 13,654
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blueper4mancez
nevermind .
Old 08-25-2008, 06:27 PM
  #26  
mchris
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
mchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: mass
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, on that pull I backed out of it early as it was a redundent pull. The rev limit is set at 8k on the TEC3. The engine would easily rev past, but why stress the crank.
Chris
Old 08-25-2008, 08:55 PM
  #27  
rednezz
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
rednezz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You would make more power with a bigger MAF housing for sure. I made more power keeping the stock intake box but just changing the MAF housing to a 3". I believe Z1 also made more power going to a 3" housing as well.
Old 08-25-2008, 09:38 PM
  #28  
marques1
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
marques1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: austin, texas
Posts: 5,097
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

rednezz: what year is your z?
Old 08-25-2008, 10:26 PM
  #29  
3hree5ive0ero
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
 
3hree5ive0ero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Dallas / Chicago
Posts: 1,337,017,813
Received 78 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

No, better question would be, "where in TX are you?"
Old 08-25-2008, 11:18 PM
  #30  
marques1
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
marques1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: austin, texas
Posts: 5,097
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

lol i think he is also from austin!!
Old 08-26-2008, 06:25 AM
  #31  
gothchick
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
gothchick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ATL
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Interesting... I think...
Old 08-26-2008, 10:04 AM
  #32  
rednezz
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
rednezz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marques1
rednezz: what year is your z?
2003


Originally Posted by 3hree5ive0ero
No, better question would be, "where in TX are you?"

Corpus
Old 08-26-2008, 10:08 AM
  #33  
UpRev
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
UpRev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here since no one else wants to do it for him.


Old 08-26-2008, 10:09 AM
  #34  
UpRev
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
UpRev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What kind of class limitations are you under? We support a metric *** load of racers through Nismo.
Old 08-26-2008, 10:11 AM
  #35  
NiZMo1o1
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
NiZMo1o1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LILjiMMYj0NES
VQ30 heads fit the VQ35 motor? WOW!!
Im gonna try to put a 2JZ head on each side of mine.Mad flow yo!

acutally they do , on our FWD VQs alot of the A32 guys use the 3.5 bottom end and 3.0 heads , it bumps up the compression.

Not sure if any RWD VQs have done the swap
Old 08-26-2008, 10:13 AM
  #36  
__jb
Z + Rear Seat
iTrader: (3)
 
__jb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: St.Pete,FL
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's the picture of his car


Here's the image of his dyno sheet.


Like you, I am also used to calling the upper plenum an intake or intake manifold. Maybe people differentiate because one of our plenums doesn't contain any fuel. I don't know, but most here consider the inlet piping leading up to the plenum to be the intake.

I am also building an NA motor and am curious about your cam selection. You mention JWT valve springs. Do you have JWT cams, too? I'm curious which cams you are using. You could PM me the model number if you don't want to post it.
Old 08-26-2008, 02:54 PM
  #37  
mchris
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
mchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: mass
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I bougt JWT blanks and had WEB cam cut them. I do not remember the profile # but it was a 278 degree @ .050" with .470" lift. With the Nismo titanium valves, thats all the lift you can run because of the step in the valve stem. I run the cams on 102 lobe centers. This was originally on my vq30 block. I just swapped it all over to vq35 block. With the comparibly gentle ramps of these cams compared to stock, the JWT valve spring is all you need to run to 8k rpm. Those stock cams slam the valve open and closed. I probably should have dialed some of the overlap out of it for the restricted motor. The drop in HP at 7.5k rpm is probably due to the 37mm SIR.
Chris
Old 08-26-2008, 04:11 PM
  #38  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

would be curious to see what it ran without the intake restrictors - with that much lift you should be making significantly more power
Old 08-26-2008, 05:07 PM
  #39  
mchris
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
mchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: mass
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ya, the guys running the dyno wanted to know also what it would do with no SIR. Problem was we were maxing out the stock injectors and I did not feel safe running more than 70 psi on the fuel rail. I guess in my old age I am becoming more chicken.
Chris
Old 08-26-2008, 05:12 PM
  #40  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I can't see why/how you are out of injector - what fuel pump are you running? I know the ~ CR that you get with those heads with std pistons, and that shouldnt put you out of range of the stock injector/pump.

If you're allowed to run full MAP, and get rid of the MAF, you might gain a bit of headroom on the injectors as well


Quick Reply: 310 RWHP with stock intake



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:30 PM.