Notices
NISMO 350Z The Limited Edition Best Handling Z Ever.

Nismo slower??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #21  
0jiggy0's Avatar
0jiggy0
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 13
From: Long Island, NY
Default

I really dont kno why you need to know the top speed of the nismo, i guess for braggin rights to your college buddies, but lulz***s have turned this topic even worse then it started so you may as well walk away.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 12:03 AM
  #22  
SchismX's Avatar
SchismX
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 1
From: Germany
Default

Originally Posted by rnalecz
I have seen some websites saying the Nismo is slower in quarter mile then a original 350z, it said it probibly had to do with the extra downforce. Is that true? Can the Nismo even hit a top speed of 160 like a original? It also said that the base 350z pulled off a better skidpad??
Who really cares? Why is this such a big deal to you? Bragging rights?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 10:46 AM
  #23  
rnalecz's Avatar
rnalecz
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta Georgia
Default

Its not bragging rights, i wanted to know if you pretty much can feel the difference. I asked about top speed because that would show the car would be slower... ex, if the car top speed would be 120 then at highway speeds the car wouldnt even have any acceleration. I'm not saying the Nismo is slower, im just asking where the f did this website http://www.allcargarage.com/2007-nissan-nismo-z.html get there info. (last paragraph)
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 11:31 AM
  #24  
dbsears's Avatar
dbsears
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Silverdale, WA
Default

That test is not very good. All their times were slow and their skidpad was low compared to what others have come up with. Honestly they will be so close you will not be able to tell the difference. Is will come down to what car is driven better. Go to a dealer and drive both and see if one feels faster than the other...having done that I can tell you will not be able to tell a difference.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 11:33 AM
  #25  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by KingBaby
it isn't slower

yes it can hit 160
wait a second.. you cant have both. it either has more down force like you and solo claim and is slower.. or it doesnt have have more down force and is not slower..

fkn make up your mind... your car doesnt defy all logic like you make it out to.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 11:37 AM
  #26  
dbsears's Avatar
dbsears
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Silverdale, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
wait a second.. you cant have both. it either has more down force like you and solo claim and is slower.. or it doesnt have have more down force and is not slower..

fkn make up your mind... your car doesnt defy all logic like you make it out to.
Do know how much downforce it takes to actually make the car slower??? Its more than you think.

One could argue the Nismo rear muffler flows more and could aid in a few HP which would be enough to make up for the adding downforce.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 11:40 AM
  #27  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by dbsears
Do know how much downforce it takes to actually make the car slower??? Its more than you think.

One could argue the Nismo rear muffler flows more and could aid in a few HP which would be enough to make up for the adding downforce.
exactly, but.. these two guys use it as an excuse when its convenient.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 11:50 AM
  #28  
rnalecz's Avatar
rnalecz
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by dbsears
That test is not very good. All their times were slow and their skidpad was low compared to what others have come up with. Honestly they will be so close you will not be able to tell the difference. Is will come down to what car is driven better. Go to a dealer and drive both and see if one feels faster than the other...having done that I can tell you will not be able to tell a difference.
Thats exactly what i wanted to know, thanks man
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #29  
KingBaby's Avatar
KingBaby
Hardest Setting
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,406
Likes: 130
From: MexiCali dodging potholes
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
wait a second.. you cant have both. it either has more down force like you and solo claim and is slower.. or it doesnt have have more down force and is not slower..

fkn make up your mind... your car doesnt defy all logic like you make it out to.
ok everyone is going crazy now for quarter-mile purpose I doubt if anyone took both cars to the track the nismo would lose 3 out of 3 runs... that's what I mean...

I'm not solo...I'm not going saw it's law yet I'm a person of reason...

there is no real reason the car should lose on a strip...

downforce isn't that great at those speeds

I have personally hit 158 in my nismo

158 is damn near 160...

now if yall want to argue 2mph then you WIN 158 isn't 160

that's all KingBaby is saying
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 07:08 AM
  #30  
EvilCrayon's Avatar
EvilCrayon
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: SFC
Default

if you want straightline speed, get a supra. just don't expect it to handle anywhere near a nismo.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 07:20 AM
  #31  
0jiggy0's Avatar
0jiggy0
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 13
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by KingBaby
ok everyone is going crazy now for quarter-mile purpose I doubt if anyone took both cars to the track the nismo would lose 3 out of 3 runs... that's what I mean...

I'm not solo...I'm not going saw it's law yet I'm a person of reason...

there is no real reason the car should lose on a strip...

downforce isn't that great at those speeds

I have personally hit 158 in my nismo

158 is damn near 160...

now if yall want to argue 2mph then you WIN 158 isn't 160

that's all KingBaby is saying
isnt fuel cut @ 158?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 08:34 AM
  #32  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

Originally Posted by jony350z
i don't think i'll hit 160 dont you need a chip for that. i never try to get my 350z 2 go 2 160 but im going to lol
It is a little slower, but it can hit 160 pretty quick still as I have video of mine doing it. The spoiler and hood start to shake at speeds above 150 though. This was stock btw.

Last edited by SOLO-350Z; Apr 13, 2009 at 08:42 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 08:44 AM
  #33  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

The downforce the kit causes will make the car slower than a Base 350z HR next to it going from 0-topspeed. The NISMO will lose because of weight and the downforce the kit has. But you put them both on a road course and the NISMO will walk away from the Base.

The NISMO is speed limited at 160mph and stops there. Now that I don't have a limiter I haven't had the opportunity to take it to 160+ again to see how quick it can actually go. Maybe one of these days I will again, but the hood lifting/shaking was a bit nerve wrecking.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
Apr 4, 2016 07:52 AM
nanotech
Exhaust
6
Oct 2, 2015 05:02 AM
Ganglio
Europe
1
Sep 26, 2015 07:06 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:59 AM.