Notices
NISMO 350Z The Limited Edition Best Handling Z Ever.

Nismo slower??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 02:15 PM
  #1  
rnalecz's Avatar
rnalecz
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta Georgia
Question Nismo slower??

I have seen some websites saying the Nismo is slower in quarter mile then a original 350z, it said it probibly had to do with the extra downforce. Is that true? Can the Nismo even hit a top speed of 160 like a original? It also said that the base 350z pulled off a better skidpad??
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 02:31 PM
  #2  
VENOMSZ's Avatar
VENOMSZ
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

See the old man in the graveyard...
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 02:33 PM
  #3  
0jiggy0's Avatar
0jiggy0
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 13
From: Long Island, NY
Default

its possible because of the added drag, but it probly isnt much more then a 10th if that, besides all the benefits you get to handling and chassis stiffness it'd far outweigh it. Im sure solo will chime in a minute with his vast wealth of nismo knowledge.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #4  
jony350z's Avatar
jony350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Thornon Colorado
Default

i don't think i'll hit 160 dont you need a chip for that. i never try to get my 350z 2 go 2 160 but im going to lol
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 03:10 PM
  #5  
KingBaby's Avatar
KingBaby
Hardest Setting
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,406
Likes: 130
From: MexiCali dodging potholes
Default

it isn't slower

yes it can hit 160
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 03:14 PM
  #6  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Yes. Its been proven scientifically using computer simulations by NASA.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 04:47 PM
  #7  
dbsears's Avatar
dbsears
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Silverdale, WA
Default

Originally Posted by rnalecz
I have seen some websites saying the Nismo is slower in quarter mile then a original 350z, it said it probibly had to do with the extra downforce. Is that true? Can the Nismo even hit a top speed of 160 like a original? It also said that the base 350z pulled off a better skidpad??
The base is not even close on a skidpad. Skinnier tires, no LSD, and on a roadcourse the Nismo will decimate it. At these power levels and trap speeds your 60ft time will make more difference than what the small amount of downforce will take away. These cars only trap 102-105 stock which is not alot relatively speaking so you *might lose 1mph on the back half. Seeing as it has 265 stock tires you should be able to overcome the theoretical loss in trap sped with a sub 2 second 60ft. The weight is probably the biggest concern, I believe the Nismo is about 80lbs heavier than the base. Honestly buying a Nismo, 1/4 times should be the least of the concerns.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 05:16 PM
  #8  
rnalecz's Avatar
rnalecz
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta Georgia
Default

I understand the Nismo has amazing handling, but everyday aggresive driving would you notice the difference?(besides the stiffness) I was wondering if you put a 2007 350z base vs a Nismo highway wise would the extra downforce cause a big difference? Would the base pull far off or would the extra downforce be as equal as shifting difference?

Last edited by rnalecz; Apr 10, 2009 at 05:19 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 06:39 PM
  #9  
KingBaby's Avatar
KingBaby
Hardest Setting
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,406
Likes: 130
From: MexiCali dodging potholes
Default

no...

drive your car

then go back and test drive a base car answer your own question...
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 07:31 PM
  #10  
jony350z's Avatar
jony350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Thornon Colorado
Default

hahahahaha so if you put a stock nismo with a stock base the base woul get smoked
or would it be almost the same

Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 07:33 PM
  #11  
dbsears's Avatar
dbsears
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Silverdale, WA
Default

Originally Posted by rnalecz
I understand the Nismo has amazing handling, but everyday aggresive driving would you notice the difference?(besides the stiffness) I was wondering if you put a 2007 350z base vs a Nismo highway wise would the extra downforce cause a big difference? Would the base pull far off or would the extra downforce be as equal as shifting difference?
Go drive them...the differences have already been explained.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 09:46 PM
  #12  
rnalecz's Avatar
rnalecz
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta Georgia
Default

Ok well i dont have a nismo Z lol. I'm trying to get one from the auction, i have never seen one in person, and from the auction i don't get to drive it just buy it, i just recently sold my 2006, and i would love to get the Nismo Z. My friend has a 2007 base and i would hate to have a sporter looking Z but lose in straight line performance, without mods that is.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 09:54 PM
  #13  
KingBaby's Avatar
KingBaby
Hardest Setting
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,406
Likes: 130
From: MexiCali dodging potholes
Default

omg
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2009 | 09:22 AM
  #14  
rnalecz's Avatar
rnalecz
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta Georgia
Default

wow this is like talking to a bunch of e46 m3 guys trying to tell them a 350z is better, but this time its about there own cars...
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2009 | 09:59 AM
  #15  
NISMO_558's Avatar
NISMO_558
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,003
Likes: 4
From: Minnesota
Default

Who the hell cares if it's slower in a straight line? the NISMO Z is made for one thing, road racing. Straight line speed isn't what it was made for.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2009 | 11:31 AM
  #16  
jray8's Avatar
jray8
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by rnalecz
wow this is like talking to a bunch of e46 m3 guys trying to tell them a 350z is better, but this time its about there own cars...


+1
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2009 | 11:52 AM
  #17  
s2k2nismo's Avatar
s2k2nismo
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: NEW CASTLE
Default

Originally Posted by rnalecz
I have seen some websites saying the Nismo is slower in quarter mile then a original 350z, it said it probibly had to do with the extra downforce. Is that true? Can the Nismo even hit a top speed of 160 like a original? It also said that the base 350z pulled off a better skidpad??
really, its slower????? i should of just bought the base model.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #18  
04zee's Avatar
04zee
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Whittier
Default

Originally Posted by s2k2nismo
really, its slower????? i should of just bought the base model.

LMFAO
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2009 | 12:47 PM
  #19  
dbsears's Avatar
dbsears
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Silverdale, WA
Default

Originally Posted by s2k2nismo
really, its slower????? i should of just bought the base model.
We all know everybody with the Nismo envy the GTR like speed of the base
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2009 | 02:46 PM
  #20  
Tarzan_0802's Avatar
Tarzan_0802
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

FAIL
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:46 AM.