nismoz1260

I was excited to see this and there was room for improvement in the launch!!
I may try to run a couple more times this weekend.

Any others with the accessport have 0-60 times to post.
I ran 4.6 seconds thats one tenth off from the 2010 shelby gt500 with 540hp

Picture attached for proof...

mistanismo

iTrader: (1)

Hmm.

AZHR

iTrader: (2)

hmmm....nice time. not sure if it's correct. so how do you like the accessport? did you get any power out of it? i heard this doesnt work for our cars. wondering if this is worth the buy.

duro78

iTrader: (6)

How reliable are those #s

HKYStormFront

thats almost a full second off the "stock" 0-60 posted by virtually every magazine that tested the car (5.4 seconds)... think your numbers may be off, either that or you have a factory freak car, has it been on a dyno yet?

Demonbfg

Ap works good on civic si's and subaru's.A friend of mine had one on his si he was beta testing it for the company.Kept right up with the nismo.

redline06

1/4 mile > 0-60

procustomize

iTrader: (18)

LOL Have you noticed his car isn't stock anymore? With all those mods this time looks much more possible.

Entaille

iTrader: (16)

exhaust, hfc's and a tune doesn't really make a car much faster. I don't trust the numbers.

musubi

iTrader: (1)

Seems possible given the right conditions. In either case, if I saw those numbers off of my car, I'd be happy. Although, I would try and compare those numbers (the 60' in the pic) with the ones off the time slips. I hear those things are very close to the actual.

redline06

idk if im missreading ur post but are u saying that ones 0-60 time is usually close to the same persons 60' time at the drag strip?

musubi

iTrader: (1)

I meant, he should compare his 60' time on his accessport with his 60' time at the drag strip. For the 0-60 sec times, I would suggest he have someone physically time him in the passenger seat, then compare.

redline06

oooooooooooooooooooohhhh lol okay

NISMO_558

iTrader: (1)

On an HR, exhaust and especially HFC's with a tune adds a good amount of HP.

Lakeside

iTrader: (5)

Nice #'s. OP's car should be around 280-289 WHP just guessing. 4.6 seconds maybe possible. Does seem alittle quick. Let me borrow that thing

nismoz1260

I do like the Accessport - now, at first i did not, when i first purchased it there were limited options for tuning basically 3 maps. I did notice a considerable difference in power though so i did not sell it (it was especially convenient being able to constantly turn engine light off bc. the hfc's throw codes like brett favre throws footballs lol). I really wanted something I could toy with myself.... now cobb has a program to tune yourself and I love that.

As far as accuracy is concerned I think the 0-60 time is very close. Think 370z.... 0-60 4.6 1/4 mile 13.4 - 13.5
I run 13.3-13.4 consistently at a very shitty track if i drove across town to the better track in my area i think 12.9 - 13.1 would be very easy. My trap speed usually averages 106mph which is really the norm for a very high 12 or 13 flat.
You should also keep in mind my rear tire is wider 285 and that helps launching as well. I honestly think I could shave another .1 or .2 off my 0-60.

nismoz1260

I agree with you 100%, but personally I think mph through the twisties> 1/4 mile this was just something i thought would be cool to try.

KingBaby

iTrader: (3)

wow so if you swapped out tires what would that be?????

now if you get long tubes with tires OMFG.....

wait tires, long tubes, and a tune tune....****....

let's just keep these times to ourselves...

jerseystyle

iTrader: (22)

Nice times. I think 12.9 in a 1/4 is a little optimistic. Why didn't you go with test pipes?

nismoz1260

Sorry I thought this was a car forum....
I guess it must be inappropriate to discuss 0-60 times here. I apologize for offending you Mr. King. How about this lets keep comments like yours to ourselves.

Jersey, I went with HFC's because I thought they would be less likely to throw trouble codes and the advertised performance difference was not significant in hindsight I wish I would have gone with the test pipes.