Originally Posted by JOKER

with a good lawyer you can blame officer for having a mustache and have your ticket dismissed.

I'm just telling you the things I experienced.

I'm pretty sure that you would not be able to get your ticket dismissed cuz of the "Beep" issue, BUT I DID!

If you got pulled over you already in trouble. What ever you do and say after that will determine if you get into more or less trouble. And not admitting to you guilt never got anyone into more trouble. You cant really contest your ticket if you admit on video that you did it. And you cant get your ticket dismissed unless you contest it.

So you do what you do
And I'm suggesting to do what I did.

And with a court record of 3 pages long I suggesting things only that have worked for me and I have do doubt will work for anyone else.

Originally Posted by JOKER

good luck

Originally Posted by sdbarker

d'oh!

Originally Posted by kutnupe14

so if a police officer asks you iif youi know what the speed limit is on the street, you say "I don't know" and then follow that up with "I'm pretty sure I was going less than the speed limit?" how does that work when you take it to court....

Originally Posted by JOKER

You have the right to remain silent

You don't have the right to remain retarded.

Originally Posted by unpluggedk

Sorry to bring back up an almost a dead thread.

I have one more question to ask.
I've got the Officer Report in mail, and I was wondering if the following would make the case.

What I received: Copy of the ticket and the copy of officer report. SMD Cert is said to be aviailable for inspection in courtroom.

Objection:
- Situation: I was chaning lane and was NOT able to overtake the car, and I believe there is a possibility the laser SMD has caught the wrong car.

Argument:
- In the officer statement, he says he caught me doing 76, but in the actual, it says 70.

Coud either be a valid objection, or should I really need to just mitigate and ask for differ?

Thanks in advance for any advice.


Jason