Notices
Photography Techniques, Cameras, Lenses, & Equipment

*** Canon 40D Thread ***

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 01:58 PM
  #21  
ctwentytwo's Avatar
ctwentytwo
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 1
From: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Default

Originally Posted by gr?
Just wait til you go from the 40D to a 1D series or full frame body.
If full frame ever sees sub $2000, I'd consider it. But right now, I think I'll be staying in the prosumer league for a long while...

One more thing about the 40D... the sensor cleaning introduced with the XTi is silent, unlike the XTi's buzzing.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #22  
Juno's Avatar
Juno
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

Congrats on the 40D!!! I'm hoping to pick one up tomorrow after work. I'll be upgrading from an XT.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 07:04 PM
  #23  
gr?'s Avatar
gr?
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster, PA
Default

Originally Posted by ctwentytwo
If full frame ever sees sub $2000, I'd consider it. But right now, I think I'll be staying in the prosumer league for a long while...

One more thing about the 40D... the sensor cleaning introduced with the XTi is silent, unlike the XTi's buzzing.
The 5D on the used market is hovering around 2000-2200. Once Canon announces and releases the next full frame body, the 5D will drop to $1600-1800. I've been waiting for months for Canon to announce the next FF body so I can pick up a 5D as a back up body.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 03:20 PM
  #24  
MagicPie's Avatar
MagicPie
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 2
From: TEXAS
Default

Well I got some full frame, and I dont see what the big deal or why everyone thinks they are something magical. Focusing is nice, and low light it great but I dont find a heavy need for this. I suppose landscapes would make sense, but I am not to worry about critical focus and low light since I do mostly candid shots of people. Plus these damn things are too big and heavy.

Give me a mid range dslr or a decent pns and am happy

Of course am not really a still photo guy, I like movie cameras--got some for sale too

I keep these around just to impress people, to be honest I rarely use them.
The 5d with red arrow is for sale, has 712 shots and maybe 2 years old.
The picture was sent to a friend to point out something, so just ignore that, nothing is wrong with the camera. Some of my sales, I been mailing the camera out to the person and letting use it before they pay me--but I have to know you some for that

The 1MII is on loan and not for sale, plus I broke it, forcing in between a tree to steady it for a long exposure.



Last edited by MagicPie; Sep 29, 2007 at 03:38 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 03:43 AM
  #25  
gr?'s Avatar
gr?
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster, PA
Default

Originally Posted by MagicPie
Well I got some full frame, and I dont see what the big deal or why everyone thinks they are something magical. Focusing is nice, and low light it great but I dont find a heavy need for this.
You pretty much answered your own question. The high ISO image quality from the full frame sensor > crop bodies. Plus, the brighter and larger viewfinder is much better than the 1D series and 30D/40D series bodies.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 09:34 AM
  #26  
ctwentytwo's Avatar
ctwentytwo
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 1
From: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Default

I would want a full frame to use the zoom lenses wide angle side. Makes alot of the Canon EF lenses much more useable as walkaround lenses, ie: my 28-135 would be better as a walkaround lens.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 10:39 AM
  #27  
MagicPie's Avatar
MagicPie
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 2
From: TEXAS
Default

^^A full frame isnt IMO a good walking around camera, unless you just want something big that screams professional to impress people, it has little practicality. In the article on street shooting that am writing, one part will be which cameras to avoid-- and these big, professional, scary looking ones are on top of the list.

Walking around would be what you have, with a decent lens thats smaller then 50mm.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 03:55 PM
  #28  
gr?'s Avatar
gr?
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster, PA
Default

Originally Posted by MagicPie
^^A full frame isnt IMO a good walking around camera, unless you just want something big that screams professional to impress people, it has little practicality. In the article on street shooting that am writing, one part will be which cameras to avoid-- and these big, professional, scary looking ones are on top of the list.

Walking around would be what you have, with a decent lens thats smaller then 50mm.
a 5D with 16-35 2.8L is pretty much the same size as a 40D with 10-22. non-photographers wouldn't notice a difference between the two.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 04:10 PM
  #29  
MagicPie's Avatar
MagicPie
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 2
From: TEXAS
Default

well thats true, I just dont care for full frame, I kinda built a bias toward small framed dslr and short lenes. One of the reason am quite fond of the four-thirds system.

Also for my style of shooting I prefer the greater DOF that a smaller sensor on the 4/3 offers over normal nikon and canon and their full frame offerings.

I suppose its a matter of preference and shooting environment, that each shows thier advantage and disadvantage. For now I am quite fond of what olympus has to offer, even with its poor high iso performance--It only I could get a canon-nikon-olympus hybrid
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 07:17 PM
  #30  
moog's Avatar
moog
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,699
Likes: 1
From: Dallas/Ft. Worth
Default

I have had my 40D for about two weeks now. It's my first SLR, and it's A LOT of camera for me to learn on.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 12:33 AM
  #31  
gdup35sedan's Avatar
gdup35sedan
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by moog
I have had my 40D for about two weeks now. It's my first SLR, and it's A LOT of camera for me to learn on.
lol, moog, wanna trade my XT for your 40D so you can learn easier??!?!
-GP-
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 05:14 AM
  #32  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

Originally Posted by istan
Finally got to play around with on today. Damn, the 40D is so much heavier than the XTi. I love it for the features, but I think the XTi might serve a better purpose for the simple mobility. I think I'm going to hold on to my XTi for now and maybe look to upgrade to the 40D in the much later future.

I can now understand the choice to keep the XTi as a backup.
WooHoo, no need to upgrade body = more lens shopping
The D series camera are built much better than the Rebel's reason why its heavier. I have the 30D and love it. Feels much better in my hands, and doesn't feel cheap like the Rebel's do.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 06:33 AM
  #33  
leemik's Avatar
leemik
!
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 4
From: ma
Default

Any back to back demo shots yet? I really want to trade in my 20D for the 40D
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 07:34 AM
  #34  
james840a's Avatar
james840a
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 1
From: riverside/san Bernardino CA
Default

I just picked up my 40D on friday after work. Got it from Ritz store plus ended up getting 18 free camera classes too. Im coming from a 10D, so my 10D is up for sale
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 05:31 PM
  #35  
breakyoselfvq35's Avatar
breakyoselfvq35
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Hills
Default

so all this talk about the new camera, but yet, no new shots!!!! lets see some shots from that shiny new camera
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 06:30 AM
  #36  
VandyZ's Avatar
VandyZ
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Well i posted these in the other thread but i will add them to this thread as well.

These are some of my test shots from various lenses. Nothing really setup other than seeing something i wanted to shoot. All but one of these was RAW and converted with very little processing. The other was straigh JPG off the camera.

50mm 1.4





28-105 f3.5-4.5

jpg:




70-200 f2.8L

Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 01:26 PM
  #37  
james840a's Avatar
james840a
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 1
From: riverside/san Bernardino CA
Default

Here is my setup.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 02:25 PM
  #38  
breakyoselfvq35's Avatar
breakyoselfvq35
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Hills
Default

Nice. What lenses are those? I notice that canon 28-135 that comes with the camera, but which one are you using.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 02:31 PM
  #39  
james840a's Avatar
james840a
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 1
From: riverside/san Bernardino CA
Default

Originally Posted by breakyoselfvq35
Nice. What lenses are those? I notice that canon 28-135 that comes with the camera, but which one are you using.
I have 2 sigma lens. one is 24-70mm/F2.8 and a 30mm/F1.4. Ill be picking up a 10-20mm sigma lens after work. Yep your right its the 28-135
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 02:33 PM
  #40  
michaeljr6's Avatar
michaeljr6
New Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,459
Likes: 0
From: small home.
Default

nuce
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:14 AM.