Jun

iTrader: (45)

Thanks for everything Gus.
Had a blast.

tucked_g35

i should have probably posted this on here first. i have the vids on my hard drive finally. now i just need to know the best place to put them where everyone can see. Any recommendations?

westpak

iTrader: (19)

if you have not done it before it is going to be tough, usually the videos come out huge in size and you have to play with them with something like Windows movie maker to reduce the size to be able to upload to them to something like youtube or google video, at least thta is how I have had to do it, although I don't do it enough to know if there is a better solution

tucked_g35

i'm sorting now through the files now to see what i can do. if not, i'll pawn it off on someone in the group with some more extra time than me.

WildWes

iTrader: (11)

Gus, thank you for the the warm welcome we received yesterday. The bottomless drinks and pizzas were excellent.

Please extend my thanks to Jack.

WildWes

iTrader: (11)

294 rwhp for a naturaly aspirated engine. lol.

I was the top dog in the Infiniti/Nissan group. But on our way to HP Logic, and on our way home, I was the last car.

westpak

iTrader: (19)

you welcome , it was a fun day.

I will pass it on to Jack, he was under the weather but soldiered through it

can't wait to see the pics, we totally forgot to take any with all going on

tucked_g35

i will get the links to all the vids on here when they are done. in the meantime, checkout the pembroke pines thread whilst i post them as they come.

MsLiLBlackNismo

iTrader: (1)

Not cool man....... You have the 3.7... As for the 3.5, I think I came in close to highest with 283rwhp..... I think its time you do a reflash, so you can be over 300.....

TheOtherRob

iTrader: (14)

283? What mods do you have?

tucked_g35

At long last, here are the vids I took. I covered mostly everyone here, but I have some more if you want you can PM me to let me know:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oWzs4C2jXM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZKvdVe5vSk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hv69YITR9IU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G70ANVU7uV0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNkuX8RCd18
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mU-Gq18aMQI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FqO8Sz64Rc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10mKZCy9bUE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1--MnYLGFg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pD9L6-I0-H4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5zvNX21hms
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20am2686kqM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NFrTwt78Xw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0FM5e2GGus
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnFqcKbMyYw

MsLiLBlackNismo

iTrader: (1)

Nismo intakes and test pipes....... Gus said to add 10% to the number that the dyno read. For me, the dyno read 257.... Add 10% to that, makes it 282.7... I just rounded up....

westpak

iTrader: (19)

I think the test pipes seem to do really well on the HR's from the results seen

Nismospeed4life

iTrader: (21)

I think that hold true for non HR's as well. Judging by the results on my DE.

BoostCrzy

Thank you to everyone who made the trip up!!....even though i was a little out of it ...I had a great time!!...cant wait for the next one...

-Jack

TheOtherRob

iTrader: (14)

So does that mean that I had 10% to my numbers?

Jun

iTrader: (45)

Do we add 10% or does the dyno read 10% less?
If you add +10%: 282.70hp
If the dyno reads 10% less: 285.55hp

TheOtherRob

iTrader: (14)

I would like to know also, since if I don't add 10% that means that every car that day made more than my car, which would mean I have a big problem.

Tuned2JZ

From what I heard and read through many forums that on a dynojet machine you get the most accurate numbers, while on a mustang dyno the numbers show around to be 10-13% less than on a dynojet. My C63 AMG has a 17% transmission loss...So since my car is at 451hp to the crank, then my car to the wheels in whp should be at around 375hp with the 17% transmission loss...

HP Logic has a Mustang dyno, and my highest number was 335whp...Go ahead and add another 10-13% to that, and my accurate whp numbers would have been between 370-380whp...That's why I stated that I made 370whp..

On top of that I was on the dyno with my 20inch HRE wheels and had my hood closed without letting a blast of air to come into the engine bay thus having my engine extremely hot...

Next time I do a dyno on the car, I'll be going to Lujan Motorsports down here in Miami which has a dynojet, have my 18inch stock wheels on, and have my hood wide open to let in the blast of air going through my intakes, etc...

Also the one hour long journey on Sat from Broward to HP Logic and the amount of times I gunned it, really didn't help me out as well...

westpak

iTrader: (19)

LOL pease do not get confused, there is no exact formula, they are two different types of dyno and measure horsepower differently, the 10% is a rough number there is no direct correlation between the two or any different types of dynos.

Mustang dynos measure horsepower by applying a load to the tires unlike a dynojet so the numbers will be lower but it is also better for tuning as it simulates "real" world conditions. Dynojets are just more popular as they have been around longer and cheaper to get so everyone compares dynojet numbers.

In this case you need to compare mustang to mustang numbers, Rob you made 262 (Intake, Exhaust, HFC, Osiris) Amy made 257 (Intakes, Test Pipes) Joe made 240 (Intake, Exhaust) so you are in the ballpark, also consider that not all will be the same, we have seen similar stock cars vary by 10-15 RHWP.