Notices
Southern California San Diego, Los Angeles, Orange County, Inland Empire, etc.

Oh yes I'm fast....

Old Aug 22, 2005 | 10:07 PM
  #21  
Risk's Avatar
Risk
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 0
From: Temecula, CA
Default

Yep, its your 1.8sec 60' that does it. Z's are great top end, but a b1tch to hook up. Nice run!!

By the way, Ive seen guys actually pull better 60' times than that with stock tires on NA Z's. The trick is to flatten out your neg camber in the rear and decrease your spring rate along with only about 25lbs of tire pressure.

Last edited by Risk; Aug 22, 2005 at 10:11 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 11:19 PM
  #22  
mrtomcat's Avatar
mrtomcat
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
From: Studio City, CA
Default

hmmh....I did a 7.778 et on a 1/8 mile....you're calling that a bad run?????? That equals an 11.6 on a 1/4 mile...

Show me any 350Z out here in southern cali that has beaten that on stock internals.

the 12.4 that IGTOTTAZ was referring to was on a different run in fontana where I screwed up my launch.

In any case I heard about the 0 Camber solution, I'm most likely going to get that done next time I get my car serviced since according to perf nissan I need an alignment to go with that.

and fyi stock tires on 445 hp will not pull a better 60" they will simply spin and spin and spin and spin.... sorry it's late I'm tired
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 12:31 AM
  #23  
Risk's Avatar
Risk
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 0
From: Temecula, CA
Default

Originally Posted by mrtomcat
hmmh....I did a 7.778 et on a 1/8 mile....you're calling that a bad run?????? That equals an 11.6 on a 1/4 mile...

Show me any 350Z out here in southern cali that has beaten that on stock internals.

the 12.4 that IGTOTTAZ was referring to was on a different run in fontana where I screwed up my launch.

In any case I heard about the 0 Camber solution, I'm most likely going to get that done next time I get my car serviced since according to perf nissan I need an alignment to go with that.

and fyi stock tires on 445 hp will not pull a better 60" they will simply spin and spin and spin and spin.... sorry it's late I'm tired
I was referring to ONLY the 60' time. Ive seen pretty stock motors beat that (60') on street tires with the suspension and tire setup that I stated. Im not taking anything away from your run, it was great!! The camber makes a HUGE difference out of the hole, but you wont be able to bank for d1ck anymore.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 10:40 AM
  #24  
mrtomcat's Avatar
mrtomcat
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
From: Studio City, CA
Default

What does that mean: "but you wont be able to bank for d1ck anymore." ????

it's kinda funny actually because if I get 0.2 seconds faster I get kicked off the track for not having a roll bar (7.5 is the limit). So for now I have to try to get as close to it consistently but not get faster since I don't want to get an ugly roll bar in my car till next year
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 12:02 PM
  #25  
Risk's Avatar
Risk
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 0
From: Temecula, CA
Default

Originally Posted by mrtomcat
What does that mean: "but you wont be able to bank for d1ck anymore." ????
It means that when you flatten out your camber to give a full contact patch when your weight shifts at launch, the opposite will be true when atytempting to put your car intoi a high speed bank. The stock negative camber setup is excellent for road racing, you will be sacrificing that.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 12:28 PM
  #26  
mrtomcat's Avatar
mrtomcat
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
From: Studio City, CA
Default

so you're saying I loose on the top end if I lower the camber?

I'm into Drag Racing, I need max performance for a 1/4 mile. Road Racing is not my thing. However at this point I still want the car to be a reliable day to day car.
I was told that the 0 camber setting only has a somewhat negative effect when it comes to sharp turns such as canyon runs and so forth.
Is that assumption wrong?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2005 | 11:17 PM
  #27  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

Just imagine if you're going in a straight line, your tires dont have any lateral movements, just forward torque, therefore the wall of the tire doesnt move right?
If the wall doesn't move, then if your camber isn't 0 you won't get full c ontact w/ road surface since there is no lateral movement on tires.
W/ negative camber, your tires are slightly rotatated so when you turn, there will be lateral forces on the tirewall, which would cause the already rotated tires to unrotate, and you would have full contact while turning, but only during turns. Negative camber in a straight line means partial contact of tire to road surface.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 12:16 AM
  #28  
mrtomcat's Avatar
mrtomcat
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
From: Studio City, CA
Default

I'm going to hold off on that for a while after I found out the price attached to it, gives me time to do a bit more research
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lv2DC_Z
Mid-Atlantic
49
May 2, 2011 12:28 PM
Dblock55
Maintenance & Repair
6
Mar 19, 2010 07:15 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:24 AM.