NA UTEC tune yesterday - dynos inside!!!
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
I have no way to post other pics of the AFR -those were taken off the wideband we used while on the dyno. The overall AFR is MUCH more stable than the previous flashed ecu was. Just watching the wideband, there are no blips or sudden changes. We did have to spend a fair amount of time in this one zone from 5k-6k to get rid of a lean segment of AFR that occassionally would show knock on the log, but once we figured out what the car wanted, that zone got smaller and smaller and now its gone completely. That's the great thing about the UTEC...the datalogging feature is worth it's weight in gold
Adam
Would it be possible for you to take the front plate off the Nismo VTC pullys you have & see if they are the same as the OE pullys with just a little bit milled off the stops to allow the extra 10 or so deg of rotation in the advance direction ?
My guess is that the OE sprockets could be modified very simply.
Would it be possible for you to take the front plate off the Nismo VTC pullys you have & see if they are the same as the OE pullys with just a little bit milled off the stops to allow the extra 10 or so deg of rotation in the advance direction ?
My guess is that the OE sprockets could be modified very simply.
Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
Hitting 7100 rpms makes zero power with the stock heads and cams.The HP falls of at 6000 rpms on the VQ motor. To optimize track times you would want to shift where the car stops making power,in our case it is 6000rpms.This would keep you in the powerband.Winding the motor out to 6800-7100 does nothing...I have proven it time and time again at the track..Our times are always better when we shift at 6000 rpms Vs 6800 rpms..
That is not exactly ture. My NA Z is still making peak power pretty close to the factory rev limiter around 6500 rpm. The rev limiter in the UTEC Software is set to 7200 rpm but we engage a soft limiter 250 rpms before the point you set. In my car you can feel the limiter engaging just before 7000 rpm as it should. Shift it at about 6700 to 6800 rpm should keep you on the power nicely.
do you think the utec could make a big difference with the hks sc kit?
Thanks,
Jermaine@turboxs.com
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Nathan - sorry I do not feel comfrotable disassembling them...would rather they remain intact. If you think you can modify the stockers, by all means, go for it. Given the relatively inexpensive nature of these pullies, I chose to not go that route (although I considered it briefly)
Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
the car is NA.....there is no MAP provision for NA
Adam,
This is how we recommend the use of the UTEC, but we have been running Jermaine's car based off the MAP sensor for the last 2 months. Speed density mapping works just as well on the NA car as it does on the FI cars and allows for some fantastic results. However, it's not for everyone, so customers should only use this if they or their tuner has the proper experience to pull it off.
With that out of the way, great results on your UTEC tune!
-Nathan
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Interesting...I've never used MAP based tuning for an NA car (never tuned Honda's, which are the only cars I know that use that method). I'll have to try it out one day as I have the MAP sensors here
Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
Interesting...I've never used MAP based tuning for an NA car (never tuned Honda's, which are the only cars I know that use that method). I'll have to try it out one day as I have the MAP sensors here
-Nathan
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
the flash has nothing to do with the UTEC - the UTEC takes over your fuel and timing from a prescribed TPS point onward. The baseline dyno I posted was my flashed car...the after is the car once the UTEC was tuned...dramatic difference
^^^
Are you talking about having an ECU reflashed prior to tuning? I know some people who get a ECU TC relfash (which I'm against) and then get tuned via unichip or w/e their system comes with. Would this provide better results?
Are you talking about having an ECU reflashed prior to tuning? I know some people who get a ECU TC relfash (which I'm against) and then get tuned via unichip or w/e their system comes with. Would this provide better results?
Originally Posted by plumpzz
^^^
Are you talking about having an ECU reflashed prior to tuning? I know some people who get a ECU TC relfash (which I'm against) and then get tuned via unichip or w/e their system comes with. Would this provide better results?
Are you talking about having an ECU reflashed prior to tuning? I know some people who get a ECU TC relfash (which I'm against) and then get tuned via unichip or w/e their system comes with. Would this provide better results?
Originally Posted by plumpzz
^^^
Are you talking about having an ECU reflashed prior to tuning? I know some people who get a ECU TC relfash (which I'm against) and then get tuned via unichip or w/e their system comes with. Would this provide better results?
Are you talking about having an ECU reflashed prior to tuning? I know some people who get a ECU TC relfash (which I'm against) and then get tuned via unichip or w/e their system comes with. Would this provide better results?
Originally Posted by lukesnyder
So your saying that the UTEC will keep the ECU from pulling timing from the motor?
The stock reflashed ECU has no say in the state of tune or mapping once a UTEC is installed..This is why it is as close to a standalone as you will see..
Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
That is what he is saying, reflash = useless...
The stock reflashed ECU has no say in the state of tune or mapping once a UTEC is installed..This is why it is as close to a standalone as you will see..
The stock reflashed ECU has no say in the state of tune or mapping once a UTEC is installed..This is why it is as close to a standalone as you will see..






