Notices
Tuning Reflashes, Piggybacks, Standalone ECUs

Utec installed.. Question (help)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 07:36 AM
  #41  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Yeah... Hopefully there will be a fix soon. Going on a year almost.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 04:58 PM
  #42  
Sisith's Avatar
Sisith
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

Update for you guys, I removed my Utec and the code is gone. It is definitely the Utec affecting this for people in high altitudes. Btw I have had my Utec out for over a month now and no recurrence.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 05:38 PM
  #43  
Dave 90TT's Avatar
Dave 90TT
350Z 2+2
Premier Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Default

Oh yeah, I knew it was definitely the UTEC, but I suppose it helps to have even more evidence. Thanks for the post
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #44  
350ZYALATA's Avatar
350ZYALATA
Tentill4z
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, Arizona
Default

Subscribing till problem is figured out
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 06:21 PM
  #45  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Originally Posted by jeremybudd
So is there anyway to know for sure if the purge valve system is acutally working when the light is on?

I have emailed back and forth a few times with Jermaine this is what I have found so far.

P1444 code present with Utec installed I would test the voltage of the purge valve solenoid harness by the plenum. It would read 11.45 volts when I would test the positive and ground on the harness. I would then test the positive and another ground source(plenum or solenoid bracket) and would get 11.55 volts. Battery voltage at this time was ~12.3V

OEM computer mintues later the voltage would read 11.55 when I would test the positive and ground on the harness. 11.65 when I would read the positive on the harness and the other ground source.

Then I was convinced that the Utec was not giving the correct voltage to the solenoid. I emailed Jermaine and he asked me to test the resistance in OHM's of the solenoid alone, with the Utec and with the OEM computer. I tested the resistance with just the solenoid out of the car and it was at .022 OHM's. I am not sure how to test the resistance with the harness hooked to the solenoid to verify the OHM's with the OEM and Utech hooked up. If you know how please let me know.

Then I put the Utec back in and the code came back after 3 starts or so. I tested the voltage again this time it was at 12.35V and 12.45V(other ground). I check battery voltage and it was at the 12.35V.

The manual I have says the solenoid should be receiving battery voltage.

I have the OEM computer back in now and will go for a week and see if the code comes back. I am not sure what else to try since the Utec was giving the solenoid battery voltage this time even after the code was thrown.
You can't really test the solenoid that way, as it is controlled by pulse width modulation. In fact, the 12vdc feed is just that, its a constant 12vdc feed and should read battery voltage at any time, to any ground source in the car. You are more interested in the ground to the solenoid, and its duty cycle. You can't test this with a 'standard' meter, you will need a meter that does frequency or duty cycle.

Then, you will need to compare the raw output of the ECU vs. the output of the UTEC. I would guess that this would be a pass through signal, but apparently it's not.

Also, you can't test the resistance of the solenoid under different cirumstances- it has a constant, non changing resistence of 0.022 ohms (most likely 0.022Kohms). You must disconnect the solenoid completely to measure this value.

The service manual states that this code is caused when the solenoid is open when it should be closed.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 07:13 AM
  #46  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Any updates on this? Ppl still get a CEL?
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 07:52 AM
  #47  
Dave 90TT's Avatar
Dave 90TT
350Z 2+2
Premier Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Default

Nope, I still get P1444. And when I went to Hastings, NE (lower altitude), the P1444 went away, and did not come back until I got back to CO. I offered multiple times to run tests with TurboXS, but they pretty much iognored my emails.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 10:57 AM
  #48  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

So we're asuming it is an elevation issue.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 11:13 AM
  #49  
Dave 90TT's Avatar
Dave 90TT
350Z 2+2
Premier Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Default

Yep, it's pretty much confirmed that it is altitude/pressure related.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 11:24 AM
  #50  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

YES!!! Another reason to move back to Texas!!! LOL
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 11:45 AM
  #51  
Dave 90TT's Avatar
Dave 90TT
350Z 2+2
Premier Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Default

I just found out I am transferring to Monterey, CA next summer. Right next to Laguna Seca. % big tracks within 300 miles: Willow Springs, Button Willow, Laguna Seca, Infineon, & Thunder Hill!
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 11:49 AM
  #52  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Dave 90TT
I just found out I am transferring to Monterey, CA next summer. Right next to Laguna Seca. % big tracks within 300 miles: Willow Springs, Button Willow, Laguna Seca, Infineon, & Thunder Hill!
G35... AutoPC... JWT TT kit... StopTech BBK... Running NASA w/ wife aproval... & now this!!! Thanks for adding yet ANOTHER reason for me to be jealous!
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 01:53 PM
  #53  
Dave 90TT's Avatar
Dave 90TT
350Z 2+2
Premier Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Default

Heh!
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 08:46 PM
  #54  
XIceDragonX's Avatar
XIceDragonX
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Gilbertsville, PA
Default

fix yet? anyone figure out which pins these are on the ECU and do their own pass through wiring to make it go around the utec instead of through it to possibly see if this would repair it? If this solves it, than utec could easily make a "patch harness" for the z's with this problem.

Anyone see where I am going or possibly be able to try this?
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 09:28 PM
  #55  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

I wouldn't count on UTEC making the patch cable, but maybe you could do it for your car.

I'm still waiting on a functional boost controller and a GUI and I've been waiting since 2006.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 09:37 PM
  #56  
JETPILOT's Avatar
JETPILOT
New Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 2
From: Vero Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by KPierson
I wouldn't count on UTEC making the patch cable, but maybe you could do it for your car.

I'm still waiting on a functional boost controller and a GUI and I've been waiting since 2006.
Boost function on the UTEc works perfectly in open or closed loop mode.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 10:01 PM
  #57  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

What kind of boost levels are you running? I've tried to set my at 12psi in closed loop and it overshoots like crazy. Adjusting the "gain" has absolutely no effect on the operation of the boost controller.

I've heard that closed loop works fine at lower boost levels when you don't have to adjust the gain, but at higher boot levels there is no tunability.

Open loop works great, but here in Ohio I need a bit more control then open loop can provide (temp changes).
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 11:30 AM
  #58  
XIceDragonX's Avatar
XIceDragonX
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Gilbertsville, PA
Default

if I could get 2 cheap "patch cables" to make a fix out of, and figure out which wire is for the valve, I would. All one needs for a very primative fix would be two straight through patch cables, cut the lead on the end near the utec, run about 6 to 12 inches of wire off of it, cut the lead on the other end near where it would plug into the utec on the other cable, and attach back.

Unless this pin that controls that guage also controls any other systems that I am unaware of? Or if maybe utec uses this singal somehow to data log anything? I am unsure. I do not own one yet, but I remember having to do something like this on my DSM when i was non turbo because I was using a turbo model's engine tuning software and device. I was able to get it to successfully integrate, although with all my soldering skills, the car always smelt a bit after, and the brown burnt metal spots behind the radio were easily hidden haha.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #59  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

You wouldn't need a full patch cable - I believe it is just one wire. You would have to locate the correct pin on the UTEC harness and then find the right wire on the stock ECU connector. Connect them so that they don't go through the ECU and it will be bypassed.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 12:45 PM
  #60  
XIceDragonX's Avatar
XIceDragonX
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Gilbertsville, PA
Default

well shouldn't the utec harness and stock ecu connectors for the vehicle have the same pin locations???
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:41 AM.