Notices
Tuning Reflashes, Piggybacks, Standalone ECUs

Crazy lean sometimes.... why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2007 | 07:18 PM
  #21  
2slo2bfurious's Avatar
2slo2bfurious
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Broward County
Default

It just stay 25+ at the end so I let off....
Attached Files
File Type: txt
Bad.txt (4.4 KB, 77 views)
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 02:13 AM
  #22  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

How does the car feel when it does that? I'm not sure where, but at some point there won't be enough fuel for combustion.

Do you think the car is really that lean, or do you think there could be a problem with the sensor/connection? Do you have an actual read out for the sensor?
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 04:38 AM
  #23  
2slo2bfurious's Avatar
2slo2bfurious
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Broward County
Default

Is there a way I can get a reading from the sensor? For the short time that I'm in the lean condition before I get scared and left off, it feels the same, doesn't feel like I'm really leaning out, the injector duty doesn't show anything weird.

I'm guessing what I need to do now is either, replace my o2 sensor, replace my fuel pump, TN fuel assembly mods are doing something weird so fix that, or there might be a problem with my utec and TN reflash working together...

Probably going to replace my o2 first since its the easiest I think... unless anyone has a better suggestion..... thanks for all the help btw, esp. KP.
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 05:17 AM
  #24  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

I would start with the O2 sensor. If the car was really that lean, you would feel it. Anything over 25:1 a/f should result in a complete misfire, with no combustion actually taking place (http://www.racelogic.co.uk/?show=Tra...l-How_it_Works - check out the fuel cut section towards the bottom).

What kind of a/f sensor do you have?
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 01:32 PM
  #25  
BlackTuner's Avatar
BlackTuner
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
Default

Originally Posted by 2slo2bfurious
It just stay 25+ at the end so I let off....
I've noticed that your tuner software is out of date. You can find the newest vers. http://www.turboxs.com/tunerupdate.htm

Load the new software then take another data log. I suspect it is portion of the map you are tracing through.

thanks,

Jermaine~
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 05:58 PM
  #26  
2slo2bfurious's Avatar
2slo2bfurious
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Broward County
Default

So I reflashed the Tuner (Thanks Jermaine), added more fuel and less timing.... pretty much same result....

I'm too chicken to floor it and hold it through the lean condition to verify that its the sensor....

Something just dawned on me though, I remember after I first finished my install and got it on the dyno, the afr readings did this sort of deal (thought it was the stock cats; they gone now anyways), however the afr probe was showing good readings... so since that just crossed my mind, I'm going to change out the bosch sensor first... Hopefully it has nothing to do with the tuner itself...
Attached Files
File Type: txt
FlashedMoreFuel.txt (12.4 KB, 52 views)
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 07:39 PM
  #27  
gothchick's Avatar
gothchick
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 1
From: ATL
Default

Originally Posted by 2slo2bfurious
Is there a way I can get a reading from the sensor?
This is helpful for the FI guys... Just installed in my car, works great, although I'm not FI (yet)... You'll want to leave the oem widebands intact, & add a separate bung for the 02 sensor for this gauge.

Wideband - Single channel AFR gauge;
http://www.aempower.com/ViewCategory.aspx?CategoryID=67

Last edited by gothchick; May 29, 2007 at 07:46 PM.
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 07:54 PM
  #28  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

The OP already has an aftermarket wideband sensor (The TurboXS Tuner). It feeds the wideband data right to the UTEC, but doesn't have a display on it.
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 09:29 PM
  #29  
2slo2bfurious's Avatar
2slo2bfurious
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Broward County
Default

Now if i could just get the stupid NAV-TV thing to show like your's KP.... Then I wouldn't have such a hardtime monitoring my w/b scaring the crap outta me
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 10:18 PM
  #30  
Darshu's Avatar
Darshu
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, California
Default

It looks like you start experiencing the lean condition only after you exceed 5 volts on your MAF sensor input. Are you sure your MAP sensor is OK / you're using it appropriately? Not to point any fingers, but it seems like a pretty strong correlation -- your car is running like a champ until it hits 5V on the MAF in all the datalogs I've seen.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 05:03 AM
  #31  
Ziggyrama's Avatar
Ziggyrama
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 1
From: Northboro, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Darshu
It looks like you start experiencing the lean condition only after you exceed 5 volts on your MAF sensor input. Are you sure your MAP sensor is OK / you're using it appropriately? Not to point any fingers, but it seems like a pretty strong correlation -- your car is running like a champ until it hits 5V on the MAF in all the datalogs I've seen.
Good call. Didn't even notice that. That is your problem. I think most MAF sensors max out around 5V. Interesting part is that the ECU usually will throw a code when you reach that voltage. Perhaps UTEC control has an effect where the CEL is masked. Anyways.....notice that your MAF voltage, which corresponds to air flow, steadily increases with RPMs? That is expected behavior but also take note how the log hits 5V and stays at 5V even though you're still climbing in RPMs. That to me is a dead giveaway you're maxing out your MAF sensor. There's no way your flow will remain this constant as you climb through RPMs. You're falling off the top end of the sensor and your fueling can't get there from here because you don't really know what you're flowing at this point. And you're not even near the top of your RPM range yet and this is the warm season When things start getting cold in the fall, this will get much worse. Looks to me like it's time for a big MAF setup.

Last edited by Ziggyrama; May 30, 2007 at 05:07 AM.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 05:12 AM
  #32  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

I hit 5vdc on my MAF sensor all the time and I don't have any lean readings.

If I'm not mistaken the UTEC reads in the raw MAF voltage and then outputs a clamped voltage to the OEM ECU, preventing the light from turning on.

I believe the 3rd column in is the raw MAF voltage and the 2nd to last column is the modified voltage that the ECU sees.

Either way, it wouldn't really matter, as the UTEC uses the MAP sensor to tune, and you are well passed the switching threshold. MAF voltage, at that point, should be irrelevent, as MAP signals are all that matter.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 05:15 AM
  #33  
Ziggyrama's Avatar
Ziggyrama
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 1
From: Northboro, MA
Default

Originally Posted by KPierson
I hit 5vdc on my MAF sensor all the time and I don't have any lean readings.

If I'm not mistaken the UTEC reads in the raw MAF voltage and then outputs a clamped voltage to the OEM ECU, preventing the light from turning on.

I believe the 3rd column in is the raw MAF voltage and the 2nd to last column is the modified voltage that the ECU sees.

Either way, it wouldn't really matter, as the UTEC uses the MAP sensor to tune, and you are well passed the switching threshold. MAF voltage, at that point, should be irrelevent, as MAP signals are all that matter.
Interesting. I was under impression that you have a choice which sensor to use when using UTEC. You can go with the MAF or MAP. Is that true? My knoweldge of UTEC specifics is limited so I could be way off on this.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 05:15 AM
  #34  
BlackTuner's Avatar
BlackTuner
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
Default

Originally Posted by 2slo2bfurious
So I reflashed the Tuner (Thanks Jermaine), added more fuel and less timing.... pretty much same result....

I'm too chicken to floor it and hold it through the lean condition to verify that its the sensor....

Something just dawned on me though, I remember after I first finished my install and got it on the dyno, the afr readings did this sort of deal (thought it was the stock cats; they gone now anyways), however the afr probe was showing good readings... so since that just crossed my mind, I'm going to change out the bosch sensor first... Hopefully it has nothing to do with the tuner itself...
Post your maps so I can see where you are in the load sites and what parameters you are using.

thanks,

Jermaine~
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 05:16 AM
  #35  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Originally Posted by Ziggyrama
Interesting. I was under impression that you have a choice which sensor to use when using UTEC. You can go with the MAF or MAP. Is that true? My knoweldge of UTEC specifics is limited so I could be way off on this.
Not with FI you don't, you have to run speed density mode, which requires the MAP sensor.

This is because, at around 8psi of boost, you'll max your MAF sensor out just past 5000RPM.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 05:19 AM
  #36  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Originally Posted by 2slo2bfurious

Something just dawned on me though, I remember after I first finished my install and got it on the dyno, the afr readings did this sort of deal (thought it was the stock cats; they gone now anyways), however the afr probe was showing good readings... so since that just crossed my mind, I'm going to change out the bosch sensor first... Hopefully it has nothing to do with the tuner itself...
This is a dead give away that there is something wrong with your WB.

If I were you, I would either replace the wideband, or strap the car back down to the dyno and make some pulls using their a/f guage, then comparing it to yours. The numbers probably won't match up very well, but the curve will. When I dyno my car we just throw the dynos O2 sensor in my tailpipe. It reads about 0.5 points higher then mine, but it produces the exact same line as my in car O2 sensor.

If you can get the dyno O2 to read correctly while the in car sensor goes 'crazy lean' you'll know that the problem is most likely with your WB.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 06:21 AM
  #37  
Darshu's Avatar
Darshu
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, California
Default

Originally Posted by KPierson
Not with FI you don't, you have to run speed density mode, which requires the MAP sensor.

This is because, at around 8psi of boost, you'll max your MAF sensor out just past 5000RPM.
Assuming you're in speed density mode and your MAP sensor is functioning correctly... (which it looks like it is, we're seeing valid pressure readings in the logs) Can we see a copy of the parameters file?
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 06:01 PM
  #38  
2slo2bfurious's Avatar
2slo2bfurious
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Broward County
Default

These are my maps, I'm going to get on a dyno this weekend hopefully and check the o2 sensor. And hopefully I can dial in the tune a little smoother on the dyno while I'm at it... I got slicks comming, I need to get some timeslips asap Thanks again for all the input guys!
Attached Files
File Type: txt
Maps2.TXT (1.2 KB, 56 views)
File Type: txt
Maps.TXT (12.2 KB, 59 views)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM
Depravity
Brakes & Suspension
14
Oct 1, 2015 04:49 PM
Conway_160
Drag
3
Sep 29, 2015 08:07 AM
cashmoney03
Audio & Video
8
Sep 27, 2015 05:24 PM
pdexta
New Owners
6
Sep 14, 2015 11:27 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:17 AM.