Has anyone re-dynoed weeks after dyno + tune?
Someone mentioned that ECUs in the Z are self-learning, and that even with piggy-bank ECUs and the like, the OEM ECU will still correct all of the A/F settings and revert it all back to its original state. This person is someone who is extremely familiar with Nissan vehicles, so I didn't argue with him.
Another person said:
So would that make things like a reflash and a piggy back tune useless? Or are they completely wrong? Again, both are really well respected guys on another Nissan forum, so I figured I'd try to find some more info about this.
Has anyone ever done a tune and dyno, and gone back to re-dyno their car weeks later just to see if those numbers stuck?
Nissan ECU learns the way you drive, and will counter AFC modifications to lean the a/f ratio, and obviously your car will run great on dyno day, but a few drives later your a/f will be pig rich back up top.
the newer z33 ECUs are like that.. u need to physically change the rom settings on the ECU chip. (Read only memory.. so hardcode the new a/f setting parameters and range, rev limit, and timing curves)
Has anyone ever done a tune and dyno, and gone back to re-dyno their car weeks later just to see if those numbers stuck?
Last edited by SniperHunter; Dec 23, 2007 at 04:44 PM.
When SGP tuned my UTEC, Mark inhibited the self learning stuff with the Cipher software.
So yes, I think the ECU will learn around the piggy back. I noticed that my car ran better the first time I turned the key than it did every day there after(before my tune).
So yes, I think the ECU will learn around the piggy back. I noticed that my car ran better the first time I turned the key than it did every day there after(before my tune).
I don't think you can disable any "learning stuff" with Cipher.
You can flash new targets with Osiris, though. That way the ECU learns towards your desired settings... or install a stand alone system that the ECU can not change.
You can flash new targets with Osiris, though. That way the ECU learns towards your desired settings... or install a stand alone system that the ECU can not change.
Originally Posted by athenG
Are you FI? FI uses MAP and it has its own table for Fuel and Timing, how can the ECU interrupt when Utec is taking full control of your Fuel and Timing on load?
Me? I'm not FI. But I didn't know if the ECU had some way of going around the UTEC or not.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by Nietzsche
If you put the UTEC in open loop fueling it uses it's own base tables so there isn't a way for the ECU to override it.
So even if you're not FI you can still use open loop??
Originally Posted by shawndon
So even if you're not FI you can still use open loop??
I'm inclined to believe that the ECU adjusts eventually to a mod. After I had the 5/16 installed, I felt a bit of a gain. But days later after about 100 miles of highway driving and some WOT, I noticed a much more notable gain - almost as if the spacer had been broken in. Traction became much looser in 1st and 2nd, where as before I had no such problems.
I had numerous people suggest to me that the Z's ECU simply learns to adjust to settings after some driving. I doubt it replaces a proper tune, but it's still nice to know that, allegedly, our ECU is always actively monitoring and adjusting.
I had numerous people suggest to me that the Z's ECU simply learns to adjust to settings after some driving. I doubt it replaces a proper tune, but it's still nice to know that, allegedly, our ECU is always actively monitoring and adjusting.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM




