UTEC Tuned Results
Originally Posted by chris'smax
yea but not all the corrections on the DD are for atmospheric corrections to my knowledge. I am not to knowlegable on the subject, but that is how some shops do "dynojet simulated" numbers
BTW i guess you still have that hotlink button working for my350z. You have the quickest response time of any person on teh intrawebz
BTW i guess you still have that hotlink button working for my350z. You have the quickest response time of any person on teh intrawebz
Nah, as far as I know... the correction they put in was just temp, humidity, and atm. pressure.
You know as many times as this dyno has busted my ***** it ain't DJ simulated
223whp ftl
Originally Posted by blasian
Nah, as far as I know... the correction they put in was just temp, humidity, and atm. pressure.
You know as many times as this dyno has busted my ***** it ain't DJ simulated
223whp ftl

No i know corr doesn't dynoject simulate (we have seen that lol). I was just stating the reason they came up with the shoot out mode was to eliminate the smoke and mirror games and eliminate all the hidden corrections that can be done.
Originally Posted by chris'smax
No i know corr doesn't dynoject simulate (we have seen that lol). I was just stating the reason they came up with the shoot out mode was to eliminate the smoke and mirror games and eliminate all the hidden corrections that can be done.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,397
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, LA
got in a bind in houston traffic last night and had to get on it.
I must say that I was impressed.
Definitely made a difference.
I'm just gonna get those numbers out of my head.
But I'm still curious if anyone knows the reason/solution the AFR spike, so bump =)
BTW chris I don't understand the hose method. what kind of hose and where do you put it?
I must say that I was impressed.
Definitely made a difference.
I'm just gonna get those numbers out of my head.
But I'm still curious if anyone knows the reason/solution the AFR spike, so bump =)
BTW chris I don't understand the hose method. what kind of hose and where do you put it?
Originally Posted by nothix
BTW chris I don't understand the hose method. what kind of hose and where do you put it?
ummmmm use your imagination???
j/k put on end on to you ear and take the other end and run it along where the flange mates.
I made 262.6 with no tune - stock y pipe and stock cats....
2004.5
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21996251@N06/2434776808/
with a tune i would imagine 280 is not to far off without headers an no internal mods at all..
2004.5
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21996251@N06/2434776808/
with a tune i would imagine 280 is not to far off without headers an no internal mods at all..
Originally Posted by chris'smax
yea but not all the corrections on the DD are for atmospheric corrections to my knowledge. I am not to knowlegable on the subject, but that is how some shops do "dynojet simulated" numbers
BTW i guess you still have that hotlink button working for my350z. You have the quickest response time of any person on teh intrawebz
BTW i guess you still have that hotlink button working for my350z. You have the quickest response time of any person on teh intrawebz
Originally Posted by Highway Riding
I made 262.6 with no tune - stock y pipe and stock cats....
2004.5
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21996251@N06/2434776808/
with a tune i would imagine 280 is not to far off without headers an no internal mods at all..
2004.5
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21996251@N06/2434776808/
with a tune i would imagine 280 is not to far off without headers an no internal mods at all..
96.3F, 37% Hum. and 29.97 Baro.
In any case, if there is more pwr to be had then by all means lets try to find it.
Lastly everyone knows that all engines even of the same make, year and model are not built the same.
Originally Posted by El Verdugo
That is a nice numbers indeed w/o the tune as u mentioned. Also your car is a A/T? I tell ya one thing at the shop the ambient conditions were these at the time of the tune.
96.3F, 37% Hum. and 29.97 Baro.
In any case, if there is more pwr to be had then by all means lets try to find it.
Lastly everyone knows that all engines even of the same make, year and model are not built the same.
96.3F, 37% Hum. and 29.97 Baro.
In any case, if there is more pwr to be had then by all means lets try to find it.
Lastly everyone knows that all engines even of the same make, year and model are not built the same.
Originally Posted by Highway Riding
I made 262.6 with no tune - stock y pipe and stock cats....
2004.5
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21996251@N06/2434776808/
with a tune i would imagine 280 is not to far off without headers an no internal mods at all..
2004.5
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21996251@N06/2434776808/
with a tune i would imagine 280 is not to far off without headers an no internal mods at all..
Can someone please tell me what he's supposed to make on a DD because I'm obviously missing the knowledge everyone else has
Originally Posted by Highway Riding
That was a hot and humid day for sure and my car doesnt like hot and humid days i can say that for sure.. It's a MT 30k and i use 93 octane and Mobile 1. Dyno'ed on a nice breezy day... 4-20 was the date lol
Originally Posted by blasian
And do you know what type of correction they used? Even when Julian@MRC tunes... his numbers are in the 280s when using DJ correction.
Can someone please tell me what he's supposed to make on a DD because I'm obviously missing the knowledge everyone else has
Can someone please tell me what he's supposed to make on a DD because I'm obviously missing the knowledge everyone else has
Originally Posted by Highway Riding
Whish i had the answer but that was the first time i had ever gone to a Dyno.
Originally Posted by blasian
Was this done at MRC? He typically uses DJ correction for NA.
Originally Posted by Highway Riding
yes sir dyno'ed at MRC. I think out of that day i had the highest NA dyno but i left before some new Z's were getting on.. whish i would have to stayed to see the highest NA of the Day..
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,397
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, LA
alright, lets quit talking about my peak numbers and instead find a solution for that AFR spike.
Anyone have any thoughts?
we were thinking that it might have something to do with the engine preparing to shift. I really have no clue though.
I don't remember if it did it before we started leaning it out.
and I've never gotten AFR on previous dynos
Anyone have any thoughts?
we were thinking that it might have something to do with the engine preparing to shift. I really have no clue though.
I don't remember if it did it before we started leaning it out.
and I've never gotten AFR on previous dynos
Originally Posted by nothix
alright, lets quit talking about my peak numbers and instead find a solution for that AFR spike.
Anyone have any thoughts?
we were thinking that it might have something to do with the engine preparing to shift. I really have no clue though.
I don't remember if it did it before we started leaning it out.
and I've never gotten AFR on previous dynos
Anyone have any thoughts?
we were thinking that it might have something to do with the engine preparing to shift. I really have no clue though.
I don't remember if it did it before we started leaning it out.
and I've never gotten AFR on previous dynos
Originally Posted by blasian
I'll get Berto to chime in but I think it did that before they started messing with the AFRs.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,397
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, LA
Originally Posted by El Verdugo
I will have to check the logs on the run to see if that was present before the UTEC was installed or it exhibited that condition as soon as the UTEC was in there.
were you able to get the wtq chart?


