Notices
Tuning Reflashes, Piggybacks, Standalone ECUs

More dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 08:34 AM
  #41  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by A.H
I didn't choose the dyno. I chose the tuner who happened to have that dyno. Maybe after I finish my bolt ons I'll take it to Stillen's dynojet to get some comparison numbers.
oh, i never implied that you went to that specific dyno to get inflated numbers. for all we know it could be very comparable to a dynojet but we cant be sure until you get some dynojet numbers for an accurate industry numbers.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 09:00 AM
  #42  
tylerxfire's Avatar
tylerxfire
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,817
Likes: 1
From: new york
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
all that car needs is a drop and wheels... maybe a new fangless bumper in the future.

100% agree with this...that fang bumper does nothing for me
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 09:03 AM
  #43  
tylerxfire's Avatar
tylerxfire
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,817
Likes: 1
From: new york
Default

just boost the pig already...
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 09:05 AM
  #44  
scmtkings4's Avatar
scmtkings4
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
Default

crap....this makes me want this car now..

i mean 50whp from 3 bolt ons?? insane...

on the 350z an intake exhaust and hfc would get you what? like 10whp? damn...
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 05:51 PM
  #45  
BrokenVow's Avatar
BrokenVow
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma, Wa
Default

hooray for still owing a ton on a lame *** POS rev-up.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 06:02 PM
  #46  
A.H's Avatar
A.H
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
From: SoCal 818
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
oh, i never implied that you went to that specific dyno to get inflated numbers. for all we know it could be very comparable to a dynojet but we cant be sure until you get some dynojet numbers for an accurate industry numbers.
Oh ok, just took it the wrong way I guess. But yea I'll go to stillen cause it's close and get some numbers on their dynojet for comparision.


And imo, I think the 370 will easily hit over 350whp. Because you have to also think that the Revshift intake manifold(don't know about the gains just yet though but crossing my fingers) will also fit the 370. ANd I believe one g37 got 347 whp so i think 360 could be doable with a very good tune. 370 is a beast. ANd imo it responds better to bolt ons than the 350 HR. I have seen independent dyno results for the stillen intake from 2-3 differnet sorces showing 14-17whp gain and not just from 6k RPM to 7RPM. This is one piece of evidence to show the 370 responds better than the HR and i'm sure there will be more avaliable as time goes by.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 07:27 PM
  #47  
tylerxfire's Avatar
tylerxfire
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,817
Likes: 1
From: new york
Default

Originally Posted by BrokenVow
hooray for still owing a ton on a lame *** POS rev-up.


Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 07:06 PM
  #48  
ambientflier's Avatar
ambientflier
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: my house
Default

Originally Posted by aloh
wow...

Now im feeling a bit bummed about spending more money on my 350

I'll never get 300+ whp without turbos!


Wat? 300whp isn't hard on an HR Z.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 07:38 PM
  #49  
BarefootRacer's Avatar
BarefootRacer
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Wow thats amazing!!! VHR swap in a stripped down 350Z base would be a killer!!!
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #50  
ambientflier's Avatar
ambientflier
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: my house
Default

Originally Posted by BarefootRacer
Wow thats amazing!!! VHR swap in a stripped down 350Z base would be a killer!!!

I was thinking into a 240sx... Or even the new 200hp se-r 2.5 motor with bolt-ons will do well, but that's getting off topic.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 08:37 PM
  #51  
WildWes's Avatar
WildWes
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, SF
Default

Wow, great results. Keep us posted on new mods.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 04:28 AM
  #52  
Datona Jess's Avatar
Datona Jess
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
From: Novi, Michigan
Default

Amazing results
Please keep us updated on other mods that you do to the car.

I now have to go and start finding mods for the car, GREAT....
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 07:35 AM
  #53  
melloyello370's Avatar
melloyello370
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Impressive. I expected more of a difference between the DD and DJ however. I believe the DD has a DJ setting that you can put it on but I don't know if it's as accurate as you'll find with an actual DJ as far as numbers go. As a quick comparison, when I had my Evo IX with mods on the DD, it made 281 awhp and when we set the DD to DJ mode it made 347. Big difference.

I like the results.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #54  
phile's Avatar
phile
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
From: central ny
Default

I'm interested to see how the ECU adjusts over time, and if these gains hold. I'd like to see another dyno taken at a random time after it has been driven to and from work/store/etc. for at least a week
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 02:15 PM
  #55  
whoopazz1's Avatar
whoopazz1
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Canada, E-Town
Default

I'm surprised no one has asked how the car feels after the 3 mods?... butt dyno and all that ?

Must be night and day!!!
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #56  
STLZ's Avatar
STLZ
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis
Default

Not to steal your thread, or go off topic to much but I just installed the Gen 3 intake from Stillen and the Stillen exhaust. Curious to know why you went with the Berk HFC, instead of Sillen's? I am debating the 2. Don't really care about carb legal, so I am taking that out of the equation.
Reply
Old May 2, 2009 | 12:40 PM
  #57  
semtex's Avatar
semtex
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by phile
I'm interested to see how the ECU adjusts over time, and if these gains hold. I'd like to see another dyno taken at a random time after it has been driven to and from work/store/etc. for at least a week
I drive my car around for at least 4 days after installing new mods prior to getting a dyno. So the gains you're looking at are already the gains 'after it has been driven'.

Originally Posted by STLZ
Not to steal your thread, or go off topic to much but I just installed the Gen 3 intake from Stillen and the Stillen exhaust. Curious to know why you went with the Berk HFC, instead of Sillen's? I am debating the 2. Don't really care about carb legal, so I am taking that out of the equation.
The Stillen HFCs were released only about 2 weeks ago. They're late to the party when it comes to HFCs. I bought the Berks long before Stillen's were released. Also, the gains from the Berk HFCs were already proven with independent dyno results. There are no independent dyno results as of yet for the Stillen HFCs. Finally, note that the design of the Berks incorporate an extended tube for the O2 sensors. That tube makes it less likely that you'll get a CEL with the Berks. The Stillen HFCs do not have this tube. You'd have to install your own stacked anti-foulers to the Stillens to avoid CELs.
Reply
Old May 3, 2009 | 11:14 AM
  #58  
Big_C's Avatar
Big_C
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 287
Likes: 6
From: Phoenix, Az
Default

Impressive #'s.

Makes me not want to mod the DE anymore and just wait till I can afford a 370 or g37
Reply
Old May 3, 2009 | 01:02 PM
  #59  
IsDatIt's Avatar
IsDatIt
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: 818
Default


The Stillen HFCs were released only about 2 weeks ago.
They're late to the party when it comes to HFCs. I bought the Berks long before Stillen's were released. Also, the gains from the Berk HFCs were already proven with independent dyno results. There are no independent dyno results as of yet for the Stillen HFCs. Finally, note that the design of the Berks incorporate an extended tube for the O2 sensors. That tube makes it less likely that you'll get a CEL with the Berks. The Stillen HFCs do not have this tube. You'd have to install your own stacked anti-foulers to the Stillens to avoid CELs.

the Stillens for the HR should Fit the 370z With no problem?

why would they re-release them?

EDIT:they are even the Same Part Number?

Last edited by IsDatIt; May 3, 2009 at 01:04 PM.
Reply
Old May 4, 2009 | 10:41 AM
  #60  
semtex's Avatar
semtex
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by IsDatIt
the Stillens for the HR should Fit the 370z With no problem?

why would they re-release them?

EDIT:they are even the Same Part Number?
I think they wait to do test fitments to verify the fit before they re-release. For example, the headers for the 370Z are the same as the ones for the G37, but they didn't immediately list them for the 370Z. They had to test fit first before listing them on their 370Z page. I'd rather they do that than just roll the dice with some unsuspecting early adopter, y'know what I mean?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:28 AM.