Notices
Tuning Reflashes, Piggybacks, Standalone ECUs

Unique Problem - Bank 1 Overcorrecting (Rich)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 05:36 AM
  #61  
djamps's Avatar
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 10
From: MD
Default

If you've got antifoulers on your lower sensors, take them off... see my other thread. If you've got a true dual, make sure you've got a crossover or H pipe on it.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 06:09 AM
  #62  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
If you've got antifoulers on your lower sensors, take them off... see my other thread. If you've got a true dual, make sure you've got a crossover or H pipe on it.
what thread?

I dont have antifowlers and it all goes into a single pipe to the turbo so no duals here...
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 08:24 AM
  #63  
djamps's Avatar
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 10
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by binder
what thread?

I dont have antifowlers and it all goes into a single pipe to the turbo so no duals here...
https://my350z.com/forum/tuning/5182...vs-tuning.html

I know it might not pertain exactly to you but it's more of a general statement for others in the same boat. Basically pointing out that the lower o2 sensors _are_ used for corrections.... When I had non foulers installed my ECU was adding fuel even though the upper widebands were showing rich. I would imagine a clogged cat or any kind of leak after the upper widebands would cause the same problem. Pulled the nonfoulers off and the A/F is now dead on 14.7 and no more overcorrection.

Last edited by djamps; Mar 26, 2011 at 08:27 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 08:53 AM
  #64  
Patrick250's Avatar
Patrick250
New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Buchanan, MI
Default A Thought

From someone who has absolutely nothing to do with this issue since I have no mods at all. Just wasting time today reading and thinking about this problem.

At work we just built/shipped a fairly advanced machine that tests these A/F sensors performance to Bosch in SC. Neat stuff. It had a robot that loaded/unloaded the sensors 10 or 12 at a time, LabView running the tests.

Anyway, the thought occurred to me that maybe the ECU is screwing with the A/F correction intentionally as a test. Ramping the A/F up and down and charting the result. Is this plausible?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 09:20 AM
  #65  
kacz07's Avatar
kacz07
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 4
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by onagao
I've just gone ahead and roughly chronicled the entire saga that hunting this gremlin has become - complete with point-by-point details of the problem and every major test that has been conducted with their subsequent results. It's all organized nicely in the attached Word document for anyone that is interested in helping me solve this problem.

I'm serious about this: I am going to give $200 to whoever successfully identifies what is causing all of this and leads me to the solution.
I will match that.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 10:33 AM
  #66  
djamps's Avatar
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 10
From: MD
Default

So has anyone logged the downstream sensor voltages while this is happening?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 01:55 AM
  #67  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
So has anyone logged the downstream sensor voltages while this is happening?
what is the channel name for those? I logged every CAN channel that haltech would allow me to log so i'm sure i have it somewhere.


also, mine would be difference since my haltech widebands are running the corrections and not the oem ecu like in your case so it probably doesn't apply to my situation.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 05:20 AM
  #68  
djamps's Avatar
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 10
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by binder
what is the channel name for those? I logged every CAN channel that haltech would allow me to log so i'm sure i have it somewhere.


also, mine would be difference since my haltech widebands are running the corrections and not the oem ecu like in your case so it probably doesn't apply to my situation.
Sensor 2 for both banks. The OP was dealing with stock ECU... haltech is a completely different animal, agreed... but one would think it wouldn't completely ignore the downstream o2 sensors. At least in the case of the stock ECU (or osiris flashed) the downstream sensors sometimes take priority for corrections.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 10:54 AM
  #69  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
Sensor 2 for both banks. The OP was dealing with stock ECU... haltech is a completely different animal, agreed... but one would think it wouldn't completely ignore the downstream o2 sensors. At least in the case of the stock ECU (or osiris flashed) the downstream sensors sometimes take priority for corrections.

ya, on the haltech the rear o2 sensors do nothing (as well as the fronts do nothing) except for keep the ecu happy. Ive had them out of the car with no issues except a CEL code.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 11:44 AM
  #70  
mgrotel's Avatar
mgrotel
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
From: earth
Default

have you swapped cats of the bad side?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 04:33 PM
  #71  
failsafe306's Avatar
failsafe306
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 1
From: OK
Default

My money is on a glitch in the ECU, like I told ya a year ago!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 04:49 PM
  #72  
laze1's Avatar
laze1
New Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta GA
Default

Can a bad wiring harness ground cause this problem?

( I have it also)
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 05:47 PM
  #73  
failsafe306's Avatar
failsafe306
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 1
From: OK
Default

Originally Posted by laze1
Can a bad wiring harness ground cause this problem?

( I have it also)
It is not causing THIS problem, but I suppose a bad or flaky ground could cause weird voltage reading.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 07:12 PM
  #74  
kacz07's Avatar
kacz07
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 4
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by failsafe306
My money is on a glitch in the ECU, like I told ya a year ago!
That's an ambiguous statement. People have replaced the ECU to no avail. Something with the exhaust cam timing? Something with the UpRev programming codes not complete with the ECT?
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2011 | 02:15 PM
  #75  
failsafe306's Avatar
failsafe306
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 1
From: OK
Default

Originally Posted by kacz07
That's an ambiguous statement. People have replaced the ECU to no avail. Something with the exhaust cam timing? Something with the UpRev programming codes not complete with the ECT?
We logged cam phasing- not the issue.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2011 | 07:07 AM
  #76  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
Sensor 2 for both banks. The OP was dealing with stock ECU... At least in the case of the stock ECU (or osiris flashed) the downstream sensors sometimes take priority for corrections.
^ This seems to be a likely culprit if the latter statement is true. If there is a leak between the upstream and downstream O2 sensor and the stock ECU is correcting for it, then a rich O2 value may still result in overfueling.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 12:51 PM
  #77  
Zazz93's Avatar
Zazz93
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 8
From: So Cal
Default

How do that bank's plugs look? I've got a similar issue and noticed my plugs say the opposite to what code is being thrown (p1283 for 3 ultra rich plugs). I'm guessing there is something tricking the ECU to feel it can't dump enough fuel in to correct. I too have changed both O2's so I'm searching for a place that does leak testing (smoke machine).
Reply
Old May 13, 2011 | 05:08 PM
  #78  
Tomci08's Avatar
Tomci08
Registered User
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Bensenville, IL
Default

I actually just got my car back after a retune and the code is now gone, passed emissions without a problem.
Reply
Old May 13, 2011 | 05:39 PM
  #79  
kacz07's Avatar
kacz07
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 4
From: NJ
Default

I was going to guess it was tune related before I even looked at this post.

After driving my car for a while, I think the car needs to be driven on the road or something. A steady driver on the dyno and the codes may not come up.

Loads vary, I don't think a dyno can replicate those situations.
Reply
Old May 14, 2011 | 08:41 PM
  #80  
Tomci08's Avatar
Tomci08
Registered User
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Bensenville, IL
Default

i had the car tuned and then driven by the tuner for a few miles, then he decided to tune some more. After a few weeks he got the tune to the way he thought was good and after 60 or so miles of spirited driving i managed to pass emissions and now about 200 into it without any check engine lights. I would def say this is tune related.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:47 PM.