Notices
United Kingdom London, Manchester, Portsmouth, Wales, etc.

What's up UK?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2005, 04:18 AM
  #101  
TheMinel
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
TheMinel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Milan, Italy
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

273.4 bhp
234.7 with a P loss of 38.8bhp

as I said quite pleased, considering that I only have the Milltek exhaust

and before you compare them to the G-Force dyno day results, take away the 40bhp that the TT car "lost" on the NW dyno compared to the G-Force's own dyno
Old 05-02-2005, 04:23 AM
  #102  
Luckyluciano
Registered User
 
Luckyluciano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wasnt going to, it's weird that no matter what mods you put on, except FI, they seems to be all within 10bhp.
Old 05-02-2005, 04:24 AM
  #103  
TheMinel
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
TheMinel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Milan, Italy
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Luckyluciano
I wasnt going to, it's weird that no matter what mods you put on, except FI, they seems to be all within 10bhp.
agreed, NA mods do **** all IMO
Old 05-02-2005, 04:26 AM
  #104  
Luckyluciano
Registered User
 
Luckyluciano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So may aswell spend your pennies on looks then
Old 05-02-2005, 04:38 AM
  #105  
TheMinel
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
TheMinel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Milan, Italy
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

oh yes
Old 05-02-2005, 04:43 AM
  #106  
pyroteknix
Registered User
 
pyroteknix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Resetting your ECU richens the mix. It'd certainly be interesting to do on a dyno.
Old 05-02-2005, 04:45 AM
  #107  
Luckyluciano
Registered User
 
Luckyluciano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

At the G-force dyno day we noticed most people where running to rich anyway.
Old 05-02-2005, 04:47 AM
  #108  
pyroteknix
Registered User
 
pyroteknix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

...and the consequences of that are?
Old 05-02-2005, 04:57 AM
  #109  
Luckyluciano
Registered User
 
Luckyluciano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know it will **** up cats, as the unburnt fuel gets into your exhaust.
Old 05-02-2005, 07:09 AM
  #110  
steve.uk
Registered User
 
steve.uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheMinel
agreed, NA mods do **** all IMO

Wrong.
You are looking in the wrong place for the gains.
Look further down the rev range and you will see that certain mods make a big difference.
Also on the day the cars running with the pop charger had a smoother curve than those with other filters. The K&N filters actually showed a flat spot.
Old 05-02-2005, 07:12 AM
  #111  
steve.uk
Registered User
 
steve.uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RickB
My figures went up in the afternoon

For reference my dyno run in the morning was actually the 4th run the car had made consecutively as it was used to warm up the dyno

My car super schweet

RickB
Rick car actually pulled just short of 287 on the first run.
This however was a test run so peter never printed the data.
He also did a 6th gear run to try and dry the rollers and the car pulled just shy of 157mph.
Old 05-02-2005, 07:33 AM
  #112  
RickB
Registered User
 
RickB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think its safe to say on the evidence of the day that K&N filters don't seem to work well on the 350. The K&N filter panel actually lost 3bhp compared to a standard panel full of leaves

The guy running the dyno commented on how well Steve's car picked up in the midrange. It certainly produced the goods there. I think short of going with a GT4 - it looks like the only option for more HP is forced induction - however as Steve says (as does his car) - you can improve other areas of the car other than peak HP !!

RickB
Old 05-02-2005, 09:02 AM
  #113  
veilside z
Registered User
 
veilside z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Engine management is the key...

the problem is kinding the right locksmith

You'd be amazed at how many replacement ECUs are for sale in Japan, a real shame that Middlehurst never came through on this
Old 05-02-2005, 09:06 AM
  #114  
RickB
Registered User
 
RickB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by veilside z
Engine management is the key...

the problem is finding the right locksmith

You'd be amazed at how many replacement ECUs are for sale in Japan, a real shame that Middlehurst never came through on this

Dunno about that Giles - it was suggested on Saturday by someone in the know that perhaps all was not lost on that front !!!

RickB
Old 05-02-2005, 09:09 AM
  #115  
veilside z
Registered User
 
veilside z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cool - would be very good to get something sorted...

Current wishlist

Y Pipe
Flywheel
Engine Management (only options at present appear to be HKS FCOn V Pro / Motec M600 or Unichip)
Old 05-02-2005, 09:35 AM
  #116  
steve.uk
Registered User
 
steve.uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Giles. Peter reckons that the chip wizard could tweak the nissan ecu???????
Old 05-02-2005, 09:35 AM
  #117  
350doc
New Member
 
350doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 146
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I must admit, I was very tempted to go Nismo flywheel, when I had the clutch and cover installed. I didn't do it, as the reason I went for the Nismo was perceived longevity; whereas a lighter flywheel could conceivably cause more wear to the clutch (if not rev matching properly). Given what has happened in the past, i didn't want to take any chances. There was also the issue of 'chatter' with a lighter flywheel.

Last edited by 350doc; 05-02-2005 at 09:40 AM.
Old 05-02-2005, 09:41 AM
  #118  
UKNismo350Z
Registered User
 
UKNismo350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK (Manchester)
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was quite impressed with my 239.9 at the wheels on the day with only a panel filter and the Injen.

I was speaking to Lee at Middlehurst the other day and he said that Middlehurst hadn't carried out any work on the ECU, it was all being carried out with Nismo, who have now decided not to work on it at all.

I really like the Idea of a UNICHIP it's getting enough people together so that UNICHIP will make a harness for it, as I really don't fancy cutting the ECU wiring loom, and I don't really want to pay $300 for a harness from Courtesy, should there be a problem.
Old 05-02-2005, 09:52 AM
  #119  
nibby
Registered User
 
nibby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can we do this thread again when the UK site is back up and running - dont like this US site, slow, not as easy to use - and the smiles are crap - UK rules the roost again then - LOL
Old 05-02-2005, 09:59 AM
  #120  
steve.uk
Registered User
 
steve.uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nibby
Can we do this thread again when the UK site is back up and running - dont like this US site, slow, not as easy to use - and the smiles are crap - UK rules the roost again then - LOL
Stop whimping



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:57 PM.