Notices
VQ37HVR Mods and Support related to the 2009+ VHR engine

1/4 mile times for the 370Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 07:51 AM
  #81  
Entaille's Avatar
Entaille
New Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,043
Likes: 21
From: WA
Default

if stock hr's can hit low 13s why would the 370z not be able to hit high 12s at least? common sense tells me it will be able to hit the 12s.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 01:07 PM
  #82  
ajcool2's Avatar
ajcool2
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
Default

Originally Posted by CaliTouring
you have to be nuts not to think its going to hit the 12s
Fixed. Go to the 1/4 mile section and learn yourself something.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 03:01 PM
  #83  
marques1's Avatar
marques1
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: austin, texas
Default

I believe the mod is absolutely correct. The car will be able to hit about a 12.7 in the 1/4 on its best day or with alberto driving, lol. other than that it will be a very low 13 sec car. Its not that hard to understand its not brain surgery.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 03:08 PM
  #84  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Entaille
if stock hr's can hit low 13s why would the 370z not be able to hit high 12s at least? common sense tells me it will be able to hit the 12s.
Anything is possible but...

It takes more horsepower to get from 13.0 to 12.9 seconds than it does to get from 14.5 to 14.4 seconds. The relationship between horsepower and ET is exponential not additive.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #85  
IS-M's Avatar
IS-M
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: SAN DIEGO
Default

hi this is my first post...............i think personally we should just wait and see arguing with our keyboards will just create madness
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 11:09 PM
  #86  
3hree5ive0ero's Avatar
3hree5ive0ero
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,337,017,813
Likes: 78
From: Dallas / Chicago
Default

I erased the last few posts.

Let's not get all personal. This is all in good fun and we'll all soon find out. Please don't send threats via PMs.

Last edited by 3hree5ive0ero; Nov 8, 2008 at 11:13 PM.
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 04:12 AM
  #87  
JunkStory's Avatar
JunkStory
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 0
From: CANADA
Default

Stock 370Z with summer tires and LSD: I'm guessing 12.9-13.0s on average.
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 08:10 AM
  #88  
HoustnZ's Avatar
HoustnZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

This entire thread needs to be deleted.
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 08:21 AM
  #89  
SniperHunter's Avatar
SniperHunter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

12s will be easy to pull from this car.

It'll also give us an idea of just how much weight drags down the performance of a car, despite identical engines (G37). 5-600lb difference should definitely amount to about a 1 second advantage.
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 09:33 AM
  #90  
scotts300's Avatar
scotts300
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,193
Likes: 7
From: Away
Default

13.4@105 as-tested by Edmunds.
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 09:35 AM
  #91  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

12.9 @ 108mph easy with good weather and a legit driver. In other words, 98% of 370Z owners will never see that...
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 03:25 PM
  #92  
sakred's Avatar
sakred
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: torrance ca
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
12.9 @ 108mph easy with good weather and a legit driver. In other words, 99% of 370Z owners will never see that...
Correction highlighted in bold.

Hammad
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 03:13 PM
  #93  
redline06's Avatar
redline06
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 2
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Originally Posted by scotts300
I refuse to bench race, but will bring my speculation about the power output.

The G35 was the first to offer the 306HP engine, followed by the 06' 350Z rev-ups and the 05' anniversary editions. Now the G37 comes out first with the 3.7L engine, and is soon-to-follow on the Z34.

Is it unfair to think that stock 370Zs will make about the same power as stock G37s? It seems stock G37s are putting down about 275rwhp +/-10, so it doesn't appear practical that the new Z would put down 300rwhp and is supposed to be about 200-250# lighter than the Z33. Do the math - it will be much faster than an HR. Screw the 1320', give me the keys to one and let me take it down Laguna Seca's corkscrew.
u know the rev-up and the 306hp (HR) are different, right?
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 03:30 PM
  #94  
trebien's Avatar
trebien
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Default

Personally, I can't wait for all the stock 12 second slips...
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 04:11 PM
  #95  
NISMO_558's Avatar
NISMO_558
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,003
Likes: 4
From: Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by marques1
I believe the mod is absolutely correct. The car will be able to hit about a 12.7 in the 1/4 on its best day or with alberto driving, lol. other than that it will be a very low 13 sec car. Its not that hard to understand its not brain surgery.


the fastest stock HR Z is 13.1, your going to need a hell of alot more ponies than 26 to knock of 4 tenths of a seconds in the 1/4 mile. It wont run any faster than a 12.9 with an awesome driver.

Last edited by NISMO_558; Jan 14, 2009 at 04:30 PM.
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 04:30 PM
  #96  
gabez33's Avatar
gabez33
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 1
From: SATX
Default

Originally Posted by 350z_racer05


the fastest stock HR Z is 13.1, your going to need a hell of alot more ponies than 26 to knock of 4 tenths of a seconds in the 1/4 mile. I say it wont run any faster than a 12.9 with an awesome driver.
+1111 the lower you go into 1/4 mile times the horsepower need to hit those times seems to start mutiplying. once you get into low 12 its a whole diff ballpark of HP numbers
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 10:26 PM
  #97  
scotts300's Avatar
scotts300
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,193
Likes: 7
From: Away
Default

Originally Posted by redline06
u know the rev-up and the 306hp (HR) are different, right?
Absolutely. Did I imply they were the same? I apologize if I did, but am well aware of the changes that have been made since the 1970 Z-cars.
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 10:39 PM
  #98  
stepuckey's Avatar
stepuckey
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
Default

in 4 X's
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 07:51 AM
  #99  
Rexy7's Avatar
Rexy7
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: Z-land, New York
Default

The feb09 Automobile mag did 14.0 quartermile for tne 370zbase..those guys can't drive...lol
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 08:55 PM
  #100  
UNTAMED's Avatar
UNTAMED
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Sorry guys but I'm going with the mid 13's. My previous cars were a Trans Am, and then a C6. My 300hp Z is not even in the same ballpark as either. Even when the T/A was stock it still would bury my current car. I'm doubtful the extra few ponies of the 370 will make a huge difference. Just my 2hp



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:14 PM.