Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

TE37 18x9.5 +12 offset...

Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:29 AM
  #21  
002-M-P's Avatar
002-M-P
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Finally found a picture of a 18x9.5 +12 TE37, for those who want to see the concavity...

http://mr2trader.com/get_image.php?popupimage=833
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 05:52 AM
  #22  
daytona350z's Avatar
daytona350z
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 0
From: newport beach. so cal
Default

the jic 350z used to wear 18x9.5 and 18x10.5 te-37s




from my experience, i have seen a 18x10 with a -7 offset fit on stock rolled/cut fenders with a 265/40.

Last edited by daytona350z; Nov 16, 2005 at 05:55 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 06:23 AM
  #23  
002-M-P's Avatar
002-M-P
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Originally Posted by daytona350z
from my experience, i have seen a 18x10 with a -7 offset fit on stock rolled/cut fenders with a 265/40.
Are you sure about that? That would stick out 62mm more than stock, thats over 2 inches further. I just can't see that being possible on the stock Z fenders, rolled or not.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 06:54 AM
  #24  
daytona350z's Avatar
daytona350z
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 0
From: newport beach. so cal
Default

Originally Posted by 002-M-P
Are you sure about that? That would stick out 62mm more than stock, thats over 2 inches further. I just can't see that being possible on the stock Z fenders, rolled or not.
i'll see if i can get a pic of it
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 06:57 AM
  #25  
daytona350z's Avatar
daytona350z
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 0
From: newport beach. so cal
Default

Originally Posted by 002-M-P
Are you sure about that? That would stick out 62mm more than stock, thats over 2 inches further. I just can't see that being possible on the stock Z fenders, rolled or not.
dont have any more angles, but this was the only pic i could find of my friends car when it was vandalized.

as you can see, 18x10 -7 come with alot of lip...
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 04:27 AM
  #26  
002-M-P's Avatar
002-M-P
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

wow thats just nuts. it like bows back in for like 8" of lip, thats just crazy looking.

But back on topic. I am still jumping between the 275/40 (Eagle F1) and the 285/40 (KDW-2) idea. I know fenders are going to be rolled with either and I really want to run some BFG's. Help me out in my decision...
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 09:55 AM
  #27  
NiSmO D1X's Avatar
NiSmO D1X
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: College Student
Default

http://www.rayswheels.co.jp/emenu/setup.html

you should get these, the black lmgt4 +12mm offset

can you rehost the volk TE37 with -7mm offset, its not loading

Last edited by NiSmO D1X; Nov 17, 2005 at 09:59 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2005 | 10:57 AM
  #28  
002-M-P's Avatar
002-M-P
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Originally Posted by NiSmO D1X
http://www.rayswheels.co.jp/emenu/setup.html

you should get these, the black lmgt4 +12mm offset

can you rehost the volk TE37 with -7mm offset, its not loading
I'm pretty set on Gunmetal TE37's, my question purely revolves around offset sizing for the most curvature.

The pic wasn't of TE37's with -7mm offset, it was some other wheel, but that lip was incredible. It had to be 3/4 of the rim width.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2005 | 09:44 PM
  #29  
Havok_RLS2's Avatar
Havok_RLS2
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
From: Bowie, MD
Default

I'm also concered about the offset question. My wife has just cleared me to take part in Z1's Work Emotion CR Group Buy (All it cost me was buying her a pair of new Manolo Blahnik's $1100+ shoes). I've been trying to decide if I want to go with the 18x9.5 rears in a +20 or +12. Z1 currently has the +20's on their show car but after hearing everyone on this forum talking about the +12's fitting without rubbing I've been thinking about it more and more.
So far my suspension is stock on my 05 Z. I dont know if any shops in the area that can roll my fenders and I'm really not sure I want to have that done. Cutting is out of the question. I'm planning on getting the RSR Ti2000 lowering springs in the future.
Now... All I need is the FACTS. None of that "My brother's friends, sister's, cuzins.... Junk." Just the facts. Will the +12 work without rubbing or wont it? And what brand and size tires should I be planning to buy?
I know all you guys are smart enough to find answers, I'm just looking for the RIGHT answer.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2005 | 10:08 PM
  #30  
Havok_RLS2's Avatar
Havok_RLS2
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
From: Bowie, MD
Default

Bump.. Just to keep people paying attention
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 05:05 AM
  #31  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

on a stock height car with a skinnier rear tire (265/40/18, or 275/40/18 that runs on the narrower side, yes it should work ok. If the car is lowered, or if lowering is planned, stay away from the +12.

My car is NOT a show car. It is driven nearly every day, hence why compromise was not something I was willing to live with. As I have said, on 275/40/18 T1S, I had zero rubbing with car lowered around 2 inches. With the same size rear tire in a Potenza S03, it rubbed constantly....no matter what rear camber I ran, and no matter what rideheight I dialed in.

As I have said many many times, your best bet is to visit the tire manufacturers sites and start looking for the physical dimensions of the tires you are considering. Every site I have ever seen lists the diameter, sidewall height, width, and usually weight. Forget about falling into the "I am running 275, I am running 285') - it is all utter BS; akin to saying "I am running 25 psi of boost", without saying what turbo is making that boost. The tire size is useless - it is all about contact patch. There are 265's as wide as some 275's, and 275's as wide as some 295's - spend 30 minutes to look the info up and you'll end up pleased.

As an aside, those huge negative offsets are great for looks, but that's it. Unless you accompany it with the right width, you end up pushing the rear wheels way out, which means increased load on the studs, on the axles, on the bearings, on the rear diff. Figuring out proper wheel sizing is not a mystery - it is all very simple math - just depends on your goals
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 05:33 AM
  #32  
Havok_RLS2's Avatar
Havok_RLS2
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
From: Bowie, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
on a stock height car with a skinnier rear tire (265/40/18, or 275/40/18 that runs on the narrower side, yes it should work ok. If the car is lowered, or if lowering is planned, stay away from the +12.

My car is NOT a show car. It is driven nearly every day, hence why compromise was not something I was willing to live with. As I have said, on 275/40/18 T1S, I had zero rubbing with car lowered around 2 inches. With the same size rear tire in a Potenza S03, it rubbed constantly....no matter what rear camber I ran, and no matter what rideheight I dialed in.

As I have said many many times, your best bet is to visit the tire manufacturers sites and start looking for the physical dimensions of the tires you are considering. Every site I have ever seen lists the diameter, sidewall height, width, and usually weight. Forget about falling into the "I am running 275, I am running 285') - it is all utter BS; akin to saying "I am running 25 psi of boost", without saying what turbo is making that boost. The tire size is useless - it is all about contact patch. There are 265's as wide as some 275's, and 275's as wide as some 295's - spend 30 minutes to look the info up and you'll end up pleased.

As an aside, those huge negative offsets are great for looks, but that's it. Unless you accompany it with the right width, you end up pushing the rear wheels way out, which means increased load on the studs, on the axles, on the bearings, on the rear diff. Figuring out proper wheel sizing is not a mystery - it is all very simple math - just depends on your goals
I knew I could count on you for an outstanding answer You Rock
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 05:43 AM
  #33  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

just something else to mention in case it got lost in that post.

I know for a fact that a 275/40/18 T1S will not rub when mounted on this specific wheel, whether the car is stock height or lowered. I also know a Potenza S03 will rub at 275/40/18 will rub - especially with a passenger in the car (when my brother used to go in the car before we rolled the fenders it rubbed badly).

What I would suggest doing is making the Toyo website and the Bridgestone websites your first stop. Find out the exact dimensions on each of those 2 tires. From there, compare them to other tires you are considering.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 11:03 AM
  #34  
bilinghm's Avatar
bilinghm
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Default

The Potenza SO3 Pole position is 11.2" overall section width, the Toyo T1-S is 11", both in 275-40-18
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 11:05 AM
  #35  
jjellyneck's Avatar
jjellyneck
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis
Default

Originally Posted by bilinghm
The Potenza SO3 Pole position is 11.2" overall section width, the Toyo T1-S is 11", both in 275-40-18
That's what I found also. The +20 must be a tight fit.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 11:07 AM
  #36  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

ding ding ding....seems small, but that .2 inches makes a huge difference in clearance. I was able to dial camber down to -1.5 out back with the Toyo's and never ever ever rub. With the S03, it rubbed from the second I installed them, and dialing in as much as 4 degrees camber did not help.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #37  
002-M-P's Avatar
002-M-P
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Yea, the BFG KDW-2 295's I now plan on running have a section width of 11.9" which is about what the rest of the tires in the 295/35-18 class are, except for the two tires at 11.7".
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 04:11 PM
  #38  
03Z33's Avatar
03Z33
Registered User
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

the 9.5 +12 will fit no problem at the rear... it's actually a better fit for the front. You should not need to roll your fender as long as your car is lowered at least 3/4" (which 99% of springs do) and are running around 1.75 or more negative camber with a 275/40/18 tire.

just for reference the JIC car ran 9.5 +12 front with stock fenders and no rub with 265/35/18 front tires. rear is 10.5 +15 with 295/40/18 and again NO Rubbing but running pretty low with about -2.3 camber.

my car is the one posted above with 18x9 +5 front (equivalent to 9.5 +11 front) and 18x10 -7 rear. This setup requires rolling the rear fenders ALL The way flat and running the car LOW with -2.5 or more camber for absolutely no rub on 265/35/18 tires. I will be fitting 275/40/18 tires soon and don't expect to have to change anything, as I have good clearance even now.

and here are some old pics of some S13's running the 18x9 +12 wheel in white and the 17x9 +12 in bronze


Last edited by 03Z33; Nov 21, 2005 at 04:16 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 04:19 PM
  #39  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

again quoting the tire size is useless - it is all about the specific tire

the JIC car might not rub but it also did not have rear fender lips...there is no way it could have. As low as my car is 9alot more than 3/4 inch), with even 4 degrees negative camber, it still rubbed horribly. Trust me, I spent a long time trying to get rid of it without having to resort to fender rolling but at the end of the day it was the only way to go
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 04:23 PM
  #40  
03Z33's Avatar
03Z33
Registered User
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

and if you want really nice concavity on your TE37 you can't beat the 14x7 +0's !!!

Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 PM.