Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

TE37 18x9.5 +12 offset...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 09:07 AM
  #1  
002-M-P's Avatar
002-M-P
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default TE37 18x9.5 +12 offset...

I'm looking at running TE37's in 18x9.5 rear with a +12 offset. I found a thread with a guy running 19x9.5's with a +12 offset and he said no problems (https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=64660). I just want to double verify this cause no rubbing on a .8" dropped (Hotchkis) Z with 275/40-18's and if fender rolling is manditory.

I really just love the look of a ultra curved TE37.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 09:25 AM
  #2  
jjellyneck's Avatar
jjellyneck
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis
Default

They look excellent. You're probably right on the ragged edge re: fitment.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 09:30 AM
  #3  
Zexy's Avatar
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO, FL
Default

A 10.5 rear with 22+ should yield the same concave look.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 09:34 AM
  #4  
002-M-P's Avatar
002-M-P
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

18x10.5 in +22 would actually stick out about 3mm further than the 18x9.5 in +12 and plus, I don't want to stretch the 275's over 10.5's
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 10:38 AM
  #5  
bilinghm's Avatar
bilinghm
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Default

Hmmmm...
If this will work, then my Enkei RPF1's at 18X9.5 +15 should work just fine.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 10:41 AM
  #6  
homiusang's Avatar
homiusang
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
From: Stockton, CA
Default

I saw a pic of the JIC Z drift car running +12 offset and it looked absolutely incredible. The concavity effect is better than the 19x9.5 +22 IMO.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 10:55 AM
  #7  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

I'll cast my vote, 275 in the rear with 9.5 +12 should be fine regarding rubbing.

Maybe you'd run into problems if you had zero camber...
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 11:01 AM
  #8  
Zexy's Avatar
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 002-M-P
18x10.5 in +22 would actually stick out about 3mm further than the 18x9.5 in +12 and plus, I don't want to stretch the 275's over 10.5's
If you take a ruler and see 3mm is a tiny difference

I think you will still rub if you run 90 degree sidewall on those offsets. Might as well go with 10.5 in the back with a 295 and cut/roll the fenders. But that's just me.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 03:32 PM
  #9  
Sponge's Avatar
Sponge
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: LA
Default

PLEASE post pics when you get them mounted. I've narrowed down my choice of wheel to LMGT4's or silver TE37's, 18" of course.
Would love to see the pics
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 05:27 PM
  #10  
jjellyneck's Avatar
jjellyneck
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis
Default

Originally Posted by Sponge
PLEASE post pics when you get them mounted. I've narrowed down my choice of wheel to LMGT4's or silver TE37's, 18" of course.
Would love to see the pics
2 of my favorites, for sure. You might want to take a look at the Do-Luck Double Six, though pricier and the wait will be longer (shipping, etc.).
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 09:32 AM
  #11  
002-M-P's Avatar
002-M-P
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Hoping to see if anybody else can comment on this.....thanks.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 10:34 AM
  #12  
bilinghm's Avatar
bilinghm
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Default

I tried a little experiment that I believe confirms that your +12 offset will work. I used the "offset calculator" on this site to determine the additional amount that your new wheels will stick out beyond the stock wheels. That amount is 37mm. I then took a soda straw (the bendy kind) and taped a 37mm long piece of it to the edge of the fender pointing inward toward the wheel. My reasoning is the this will simulate the new amount of clearence under the fender. Then I went driving to see if the tire/wheel would hit the straw. Over railroad crossings, speed bumps, etc. Result? The straw was not bent over. Conclusion: 9.5 +15 won't rub. What do you think?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 10:35 AM
  #13  
leemik's Avatar
leemik
!
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 4
From: ma
Default

well, I'm running with 18" (9.5) TE-37's 275/40/18 tires... with a +30 offset and a +15 spacer... I'm guessing this makes my final offset +15 in the rear?

I'm also lowered with a set of Cusco zero-2's.... so low that i can't really slide a finger in between the tire and wheel well on top.. I also have a set of SPC camber arms pulling me back to factory spec.. So I have little negative camber..

I have no rubbing issues .. i think i may be able to go to +12 without rubbing but it's REAL close.. You will probably clear it fine because you are not as low as I am..

--mike
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 10:46 AM
  #14  
002-M-P's Avatar
002-M-P
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Originally Posted by leemik
well, I'm running with 18" (9.5) TE-37's 275/40/18 tires... with a +30 offset and a +15 spacer... I'm guessing this makes my final offset +15 in the rear?

I'm also lowered with a set of Cusco zero-2's.... so low that i can't really slide a finger in between the tire and wheel well on top.. I also have a set of SPC camber arms pulling me back to factory spec.. So I have little negative camber..

I have no rubbing issues .. i think i may be able to go to +12 without rubbing but it's REAL close.. You will probably clear it fine because you are not as low as I am..

--mike
Thanks for the info mike...are your fenders rolled?....I am not as low as you I wouldn't think (Hotchkis Springs=no need for camber arms because of mild drop). That is so crucial, glad I went with the Hotchkis spring setup (just installed last night, haha). I'm probably gonna call around see what the best price I can get is and the time it woudl take to get them (2-3 months I am expecting).

Oh yeah...thanks for the straw experiment bilinghm
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 11:16 AM
  #15  
leemik's Avatar
leemik
!
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 4
From: ma
Default

My fenders are not rolled...
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 11:17 AM
  #16  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

all depends how low you go and what exact tire you use (not the size)

18x9.5 +20, lowered as much as leemik's car in the rear, never rubbed with 275/40/18 T1S.

With S03's, no matter how much camber I dialed in, it rubbed - had to roll the fenders
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 11:25 AM
  #17  
MarquisDeSam's Avatar
MarquisDeSam
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

i have 18 x 9.5 +22 offset te37 and it's concaved pretty deep... I guess it would be ok if you don't plan on getting a BBK... i heard +12 wouldn't clear...
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 12:28 PM
  #18  
002-M-P's Avatar
002-M-P
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

I called Steve at Evolution Autosports just a little bit ago and we discussed this idea a bit. At first he was skeptical about it, but then realized that it would have about the same concavity of the 18x10.5 +22, but just wouldn't go in towards the strut as much, making it easy for me to have 275/40's and not having to stretch them over a 10.5" rim. Chances are I am going to go with this setup (18x9.5 +12 and 18x8.5+22). Only problem is since its such a random size I get to go through with the good old 90 day wait with upfront payment. As far is fender rolling goes, I will just have to play that by ear once I get the wheels.

*On a good note about the 90 day wait though...you get to pay for wheels then wait 90 days and pay for the tires. (While your still paying the same it feels like less since it is two payments )

EDIT: Another question....would by doing this effectively be like running a +22 with a 10mm spacer or am I just looking at that aspect wrong?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 02:37 PM
  #19  
ppw350Zunit's Avatar
ppw350Zunit
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 002-M-P
EDIT: Another question....would by doing this effectively be like running a +22 with a 10mm spacer or am I just looking at that aspect wrong?
i have a set of 10mm spacers for sale if you need them.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 02:58 PM
  #20  
002-M-P's Avatar
002-M-P
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Originally Posted by ppw350Zunit
i have a set of 10mm spacers for sale if you need them.
I'm going with +12 so I get the same effect as a 9.5 +22 w/ 10mm spacer, but get the look of the 10.5 +22. I love the concavity.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:36 AM.