Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

Crazy offsets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 05:52 AM
  #1  
Camber's Avatar
Camber
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default Crazy offsets

Just curious as to how aggressive z owners can get with their offsets. Anyone running something flush or more than flush (i.e. poke) or anyone cambering in order to fit their wheels? Pulled fenders etc. Post up your pics please.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 06:00 AM
  #2  
drumma022's Avatar
drumma022
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: ORL, FL
Default

19x9.5 +11 and 19x10.5 +11 is the 2nd most aggressive offset I have seen on this board.

Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 06:16 AM
  #3  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

The lord helps those who helps themselves. There are members who run so tight in the back that you cannot put a finger between the fender and the tire. Look and you will find.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 08:01 AM
  #4  
GQ 350z's Avatar
GQ 350z
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,674
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default

I'm rocking +19 front, +17 rear. Thinking of doing a 5mm spacer in the front. (Car will be even lower in two weeks).

Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 08:21 AM
  #5  
Selski12's Avatar
Selski12
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Running the same as GQ 350Z.



I wonder if 285/35 (currently have 275/35 rear lowered on Tanabe GF210) would fit in the rear with the 10.5" +17...
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 08:25 AM
  #6  
GQ 350z's Avatar
GQ 350z
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,674
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default

Only if your fenders are rolled. I would say 285/30 is more reasonable..the 285/35 would be ugly imo.

I'm going probably 305 next time around, if I can get myself to drop on the Pirellis.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 08:31 AM
  #7  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Originally Posted by GQ 350z
Only if your fenders are rolled. I would say 285/30 is more reasonable..the 285/35 would be ugly imo.
I disagree that 285/35 is "ugly"... I have seen 285/30 and the sidewall profile is like miniature. You need to drop the car about 2" in the back to eliminate wheel gap if you have 285/30. Plus if you're doing 245/35, 255/35 in front, then 285/35 is more technically correct in the rear while 285/30 is incorrect.

Tire size calculators can help you determine the closest matchup to stock when it comes to outer diameter of your new wheels/tires.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 08:48 AM
  #8  
GQ 350z's Avatar
GQ 350z
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,674
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default

Point taken, however my car is about that low--I should have taken that into consideration.

It's just too much sidewall for my taste (I might be the minority here).
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 09:15 AM
  #9  
drumma022's Avatar
drumma022
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: ORL, FL
Default

Im running 235/35/19 and 265/30/19 I am considering upping it to 245/275, but as it sits with 3 deg camber in the rear, I rub on LARGE dips.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 09:17 AM
  #10  
Auto RnD's Avatar
Auto RnD
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Milpitas, CA.
Default

have a customer running 9 and 10 with ZERO OFFSETS
245 and 275 =)





How is that for flush =)


Here are full size pics

Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 10:17 AM
  #11  
drumma022's Avatar
drumma022
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: ORL, FL
Default

Looks like I need a 5mm spacer to beat that!
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 11:25 AM
  #12  
MustGoFastR's Avatar
MustGoFastR
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Default

How on Earth is there any usable suspension travel with that and how the heck can the front wheels turn without rubbing? That's insane!
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 11:57 AM
  #13  
anotheraznguy's Avatar
anotheraznguy
Registered User
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
From: Tracy Ca
Default

by the way that is my car =)
HEhehe..

So there is full suspension travel.
Rear actually cambers in more when you hit a bump so it never rubs..
my front however i rub the ubber fender well..
i am soo low that when i drive hard.
i sometimes pop the plastic clips near the battery offf =)
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 12:01 PM
  #14  
GQ 350z's Avatar
GQ 350z
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,674
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by anotheraznguy
by the way that is my car =)
i am soo low that when i drive hard.
i sometimes pop the plastic clips near the battery offf =)

gasps I think I am in love LOL..

soon man soon, hit me up =) Can't wait to get rid of my 4x4 look LOL even though I'm already dropped like 1.3"
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 12:14 PM
  #15  
comebackZ's Avatar
comebackZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 1
From: Virginia
Default

Ok crazy offsets? You all seem to know more about wheels then I do. What offset should I run if I am using a 19x13" wheels in the rear and have extended the fenders 4inches (mastergrade kit). I'm having custom built HRE's so I can tell him whatever offset to make. Someone told em that I will have to have a -11 offset or something like that.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 12:19 PM
  #16  
anotheraznguy's Avatar
anotheraznguy
Registered User
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
From: Tracy Ca
Default

ok so front and rear..
what are the wideness of the stock fenders..
and for the front wat width you gonna run?


For the rear if its 4 inch bigger then you can run...
19x13 -44 offset =)
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 12:28 PM
  #17  
fahrenheit350's Avatar
fahrenheit350
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: OC n 909'r
Default

Originally Posted by anotheraznguy
For the rear if its 4 inch bigger then you can run...
19x13 -44 offset =)
Hmmmm... the only person I know that would say that is Colin or Josh.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 12:31 PM
  #18  
comebackZ's Avatar
comebackZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 1
From: Virginia
Default

See I just really need help because wheels is one thing that I know very little about. A -44?
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 12:32 PM
  #19  
anotheraznguy's Avatar
anotheraznguy
Registered User
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
From: Tracy Ca
Default

simple math for the rear.

stock setup is 19x10 +20
now...
4 inch = 100 mm
a 19x13 with same front spacing as a 19x10 would be +56
so.

19x13 +56 add the 100mm extra fender and it ends up being...
19x13 -44
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 12:43 PM
  #20  
comebackZ's Avatar
comebackZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 1
From: Virginia
Default

My stock wheels were the 03 Rays that came on the track. I thought they were 18x8s and I know they aren't 19s? Thanks a lot and do you know if I could use a 285 tire on a 12" wide wheel and what would the offset be for the front(still four inches wider)?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:33 PM.