How crazy is this offset? "BALLER" RIMS
02-06-2007, 04:31 PM
#42
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by halftone
someone buy my sf-winnings for $2500 shipped.
the titanium rims are in!
Attachment 133357Attachment 133358
the titanium rims are in!
Attachment 133357Attachment 133358
All you need now is a concieled weapons permit so you can carry a pistol. I know I would rolling on those.. FREAKIN sexy can't even describe those
02-06-2007, 09:58 PM
#43
Originally Posted by davidf
I wonder if they make them in +24 offset like my GT-7's.
I like my 4" lip. Anyone got any clues?
I like my 4" lip. Anyone got any clues?
OP, Pick up these wheels already! Can't be balling if you don't have credit!
02-06-2007, 11:28 PM
#44
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD 818
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ___DJK___
+12 will have more of a lip than a +24 assuming the wheels are the same width
OP, Pick up these wheels already! Can't be balling if you don't have credit!
OP, Pick up these wheels already! Can't be balling if you don't have credit!
02-07-2007, 08:00 AM
#45
New Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beaumont, Texas
Posts: 5,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ___DJK___
+12 will have more of a lip than a +24 assuming the wheels are the same width
OP, Pick up these wheels already! Can't be balling if you don't have credit!
OP, Pick up these wheels already! Can't be balling if you don't have credit!
02-07-2007, 08:41 AM
#46
Originally Posted by davidf
By the pic. my 10.5 +24 has more lip than that. It could be the angle of the pic. that makes it look not too deep. BTW there was a weight issue question raised a while back. Anyone got the true weight on these?
Yes they are heavy! I think Andy said they were around 30 lbs.
02-07-2007, 05:33 PM
#49
New Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beaumont, Texas
Posts: 5,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ___DJK___
Thats not because of offset. These wheels are 19x10 vs your GT-7s which are 19x10.5.
Yes they are heavy! I think Andy said they were around 30 lbs.
Yes they are heavy! I think Andy said they were around 30 lbs.
02-08-2007, 02:49 PM
#50
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: dallas
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidf
By the pic. my 10.5 +24 has more lip than that. It could be the angle of the pic. that makes it look not too deep. BTW there was a weight issue question raised a while back. Anyone got the true weight on these?
02-09-2007, 11:49 AM
#52
New Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beaumont, Texas
Posts: 5,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by starve
Lets hope that picture he posted is a front wheel, and not the rear. Cause the 10 inch +12 rear should have a deep/concave face and a 94mm lip.
02-09-2007, 03:52 PM
#55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NORTH HOLLYWOOD 818
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pln2311
Those rims suck. Ballers don't buy rims that are about as dialed out as aids.
02-11-2007, 08:05 PM
#58
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: chula vista
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
damn i want these rims so bad! wanna just trade with my bronze te37's for a daily wheel? im sure u wouldnt wanna scratch your titanium rims. or you can sell em. i know alot of people want te37's here and mine are in immaculate condition with no rash or scratches!
