Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

why is this size so common

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2007 | 06:40 PM
  #1  
Chad68's Avatar
Chad68
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,171
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default why is this size so common

When running aftermarket 8.5" wide wheels up front and 9.5" wide wheels out back, why does most everybody use a 245 wide tire up front and 275's on the back? Well actually I know why they use the 275's out back but why a 245 up front, instead of a 255?

With the factory 18's, the rears are 2 sizes wider than the fronts (225 and 245's).

Wouldn't the steering be more nuetral with a 255 on the front and 275 on the back?

I have 245/35/19's on 8.5" wheels on the front and 275/35/19's on the 9.5" rear wheels. The sidewalls on the front are just every so slightly stretched looking and a 255 would make the sidewall match the rears sidewall which is straight up and down. Plus by having a 2 size width difference between the front and rear, it would be similar to the factory stagger.

I went with a 245 up front mostly because that seems to be the norm for those rim sizes but I want to know if there is any benefit with running a 255/35 up front. One benifit would be more cushion for potholes any others?
Old 01-26-2007 | 06:55 PM
  #2  
Fluid1's Avatar
Fluid1
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
From: NOPE NOPE NOPE
Default

Honest answer? Hype. People like the look of staggered rims and tires. 99% of them don't know or care how much the rims/tires weigh, or what they do to the actual performance and handling of the car. It's pathetic if you ask me.

I have 7.5" wide rims in front and 8" in back. 255 tires all around.
Old 01-26-2007 | 07:24 PM
  #3  
bofa's Avatar
bofa
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

I have 20" wheels.. I think for me anything more than 245 up front will rub like crazy without rolling the fenders. Are you just asking about 19s?
Old 01-26-2007 | 08:38 PM
  #4  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,754
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Everybody does not do anything.

255mm in front with first rate tires is great for dry road under steer. On wet roads at 70 MPH I would be skittish: wide and hydroplaning go hand-and-hand.
Old 01-26-2007 | 09:00 PM
  #5  
SpoilsofWar's Avatar
SpoilsofWar
Registered User
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 1
From: Way North, New York
Default

Well I think a better question to ask would be:

"is there any difference between running a 245 series front as opposed to a 255 front?"

And the answer is; not one you will notice.
Old 01-26-2007 | 09:02 PM
  #6  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

I use 245/275 cause i was suggested it. after driving on it, i actually feel i need to go 255/275 or even 265 all around.
Old 01-26-2007 | 09:57 PM
  #7  
HyperSprite's Avatar
HyperSprite
Mad Scientist
Premier Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,795
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Yeah, the 245/275 was a factory recommendation for the Nismo 8.5/9.5 combo. Lots of other people went with that.

I am not running 245/275 though, I refuse to conform.

Chris
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sales@czp
Engine
33
09-23-2019 03:30 PM
MicVelo
NorCal Marketplace
9
10-04-2015 07:55 PM
EnjukuRacing
Engine
0
09-30-2015 06:55 AM



Quick Reply: why is this size so common



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:11 PM.