Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

non staggered Wheels bad??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2008, 06:12 AM
  #21  
adamkeaman
Registered User
 
adamkeaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wixom
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You could easily move those wheels to a different vehicle. My suggestion would be to sell those on ebay or craigslist or something of the sort and get yourself a set that are made for that vehicle rather than a common sized wheel that is made for everything.
Old 07-02-2008, 03:49 PM
  #22  
Spike100
New Member
 
Spike100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edina, Minnesota
Posts: 7,337
Received 203 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spike100
Are you still running 245/40-18" all-square?

--Spike
Originally Posted by Tubbs
yep. would never go back to the understeer of staggered wheels.
Have you considered 245/45-18” all square?

That would run successfully with your car (I believe you have VDC).

And yes… I know you always turn VDC off… but if you wanted it ON or forget to turn it OFF, 245/45-18” would provide better sizing.

--Spike
Old 07-02-2008, 03:53 PM
  #23  
Gag83
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Gag83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

staggered wheels makes u understeer more?
Old 07-02-2008, 03:58 PM
  #24  
Tubbs
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Tubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spike100
Have you considered 245/45-18” all square?

That would run successfully with your car (I believe you have VDC).

And yes… I know you always turn VDC off… but if you wanted it ON or forget to turn it OFF, 245/45-18” would provide better sizing.

--Spike

?huh? I said I wouldn't go back to staggered.
Old 07-02-2008, 03:59 PM
  #25  
Tubbs
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Tubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gag83
staggered wheels makes u understeer more?

Think about it.
Old 07-02-2008, 04:02 PM
  #26  
Spike100
New Member
 
Spike100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edina, Minnesota
Posts: 7,337
Received 203 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

A staggered setup will understeer if the fronts are 225mm. If you go to 245mm on the front (and certainly if the rears are 245mm) you have neutral-steer. That is mainly because the fronts at 245mm grip better (i.e., better "turn-in") and don't plow.

And... I notice that 245mm on the front teamed with 275mm on the rear provide nearly the same neutral steer you get with 245mm all-square. I suppose tht is simply because the 245's on the front hold very well with the Z's weight.

My comments and experience is based upon personal experience driving a Z with stock suspension. I cannot say what effect happens when changing springs, shocks, and sway bars.

--Spike
Old 07-02-2008, 04:05 PM
  #27  
Spike100
New Member
 
Spike100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edina, Minnesota
Posts: 7,337
Received 203 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tubbs
?huh? I said I wouldn't go back to staggered.
245/45-18" all around isn't staggered.

--Spike
Old 07-02-2008, 04:08 PM
  #28  
KornerCarver
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
KornerCarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Republic, MO
Posts: 3,387
Received 171 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Obviously I have little or no taste but I happen to love chrome wheels. The wheels in question are not what I would choose but I don't think hideous is a correct description. Overall, I don't think they look too bad.

Les
Old 07-02-2008, 04:15 PM
  #29  
redlude97
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
redlude97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle/Portland
Posts: 2,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spike100
A staggered setup will understeer if the fronts are 225mm. If you go to 245mm on the front (and certainly if the rears are 245mm) you have neutral-steer. That is mainly because the fronts at 245mm grip better (i.e., better "turn-in") and don't plow.

And... I notice that 245mm on the front teamed with 275mm on the rear provide nearly the same neutral steer you get with 245mm all-square. I suppose tht is simply because the 245's on the front hold very well with the Z's weight.

My comments and experience is based upon personal experience driving a Z with stock suspension. I cannot say what effect happens when changing springs, shocks, and sway bars.

--Spike
+1, its not really that a square setup is more neutral, its that the Z/G's are undertired up front. Someone I know who autocrosses religiously went from 275's all around to 285F/305R and doesn't complain one bit about understeering
Old 07-02-2008, 04:25 PM
  #30  
Tubbs
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Tubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spike100
245/45-18" all around isn't staggered.

--Spike

Here's your original question and my reply.


"Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike100
Are you still running 245/40-18" all-square?

--Spike


yep. would never go back to the understeer of staggered wheels."



This means that I like having the square set up, and would not go back to having staggered wheels.
Old 07-02-2008, 04:47 PM
  #31  
Spike100
New Member
 
Spike100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edina, Minnesota
Posts: 7,337
Received 203 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

^^ You are not understanding my question, which is:

Have you considered running 245/45-18" all square instead of your 245/40-18" setup?

--Spike
Old 07-02-2008, 04:54 PM
  #32  
Tubbs
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Tubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spike100
^^ You are not understanding my question, which is:

Have you considered running 245/45-18" all square instead of your 245/40-18" setup?

--Spike

But I haven't had any problems with my set up since a year ago. Wouldn't change a damn thing.
Old 07-02-2008, 05:42 PM
  #33  
Spike100
New Member
 
Spike100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edina, Minnesota
Posts: 7,337
Received 203 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tubbs
But I haven't had any problems with my set up since a year ago. Wouldn't change a damn thing.
Glad to hear things are working now. I was referring to a post you made a while ago where you described a problem with your tire setup (all square245/40-18") and VDC.

I'm suggesting 245/45-18" instead of your 245/40-18" setup to avoid the problem you reported with VDC and 245/40-18".

Just wondering if you considered this all square size, but your response says "NO" (QUOTE=Tubbs: "Wouldn't change a damn thing.") So... I have my answer... thanks for the response.

--Spike
Old 07-02-2008, 05:49 PM
  #34  
Tubbs
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Tubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spike100
Glad to hear things are working now. I was referring to a post you made a while ago where you described a problem with your tire setup (all square245/40-18") and VDC.

I'm suggesting 245/45-18" instead of your 245/40-18" setup to avoid the problem you reported with VDC and 245/40-18".

Just wondering if you considered this all square size, but your response says "NO" (QUOTE=Tubbs: "Wouldn't change a damn thing.") So... I have my answer... thanks for the response.

--Spike

Ya... i haven't had the problem since. I dunno?
Old 07-02-2008, 05:58 PM
  #35  
Spike100
New Member
 
Spike100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edina, Minnesota
Posts: 7,337
Received 203 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redlude97
+1, its not really that a square setup is more neutral, its that the Z/G's are undertired up front. Someone I know who autocrosses religiously went from 275's all around to 285F/305R and doesn't complain one bit about understeering
Thanks for posting your comments. I was beginning to think I was the only one noticing this.

40 years ago and driving a 911 Porsche, I (along with many other Porsche owners) noticed the horrible and dangerous over-steer of this car (with its engine and weight behind the rear wheels and 4 identically sized tires). If you “lost it” in a corner, you were into an unrecoverable spin since the rear end went out completely (due to the car’s horrible weight distribution that caused the over-steer).

Porsche fixed the problem over time by providing an exaggerated staggered tire setup to compensate for this problem that happens with a rear engine car (that inherently has poor weight distribution). And… the look (not necessarily the function for other cars) caught on. People really liked the flared rear fenders/wheel well and the wide rear tires. In fact, Porsche buyers preferred this look to the point that the company wasn’t able to abandon this weird car (a rear engine design is about as bad as you can get), and it still exists today.

That is not the case with the 350z which is nearly even weight distribution front to rear. But, to keep a rear wheel drive car easier and safer to drive, Nissan chose to put 225mm tires on the front and wider tires on the rear. That makes the car under-steer, and safer for less experienced drivers operating a powerful performance car with rear wheel drive. If you hit a turn too hard and you have the OEM tire setup (225mm front), you will likely plow and continue forward (which is the safest way to miss a turn). That’s under-steer.

Under-steer is good for a car manufacturer who must provide a car that just about anyone can drive safely in this litigious society. But, an experienced driver wanting a better handling car and superior experience will choose a different setup. The better drive wants a car with neutral –steer (it will “drift” when pushed very hard in a turn). Mounting 245mm tires (or greater width tires) on the Z’s front will do this.

The only instance you will get over-steer on the Z (since it is balanced very well) is running worn rear tires… and that is stupid.

--Spike
Old 07-02-2008, 06:39 PM
  #36  
Gag83
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Gag83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok so to get this straight. Itd be ok for me to put 18x7.5 inch rims on my setup right now without changing anything?!?!?!?
Old 07-02-2008, 07:18 PM
  #37  
Spike100
New Member
 
Spike100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edina, Minnesota
Posts: 7,337
Received 203 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gag83
Ok so to get this straight. Itd be ok for me to put 18x7.5 inch rims on my setup right now without changing anything?!?!?!?
Yes you can do this. If I have it right, the tires are 245/45-18". If that is the case, you are "good to go" with that wheel size (18x7.5").

Of course, the wheel size and the offsets you have are terrible for the Z... But you can mount your tires on these wheels... It's only that the result is really ugly.

--Spike
Old 07-02-2008, 08:02 PM
  #38  
Spike100
New Member
 
Spike100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edina, Minnesota
Posts: 7,337
Received 203 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tubbs
Ya... i haven't had the problem since. I dunno?
I remember you saying that you will always turn VDC off.

Are you still doing this? (Always turning VDC off).

--Spike
Old 07-02-2008, 09:17 PM
  #39  
Tubbs
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Tubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spike100
I remember you saying that you will always turn VDC off.

Are you still doing this? (Always turning VDC off).

--Spike

On road trips yes, general driving no.
Old 07-03-2008, 01:43 AM
  #40  
Ziggyrama
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Ziggyrama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northboro, MA
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I switched to a square setup not too long ago from the stock staggered configuration and it's definitely the way to go. The handling is much better now. I will probably stay with this setup for a while and when it's time for new rubber, I'll just go up in size a bit but still stay with a square configuration. Staggered looks OK but if you go big enough in the front and the same size in the rear, it still looks good and most importantly, it performs


Quick Reply: non staggered Wheels bad??



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:25 AM.