AG 5 spokes..should I get all 4 concacave?
Hi, Just about ready to order Avant Garde M550's. I'm looking at 8.5's in the front and 9.5 rear. The 9.5's are very concave, the 8.5's not so much. Just wondering if I should do the deep concave all round instead. Photoshop pic of the wheels on silver below. Thanks to Mod Bargains and the OP for the use of the pic. Thoughts...
https://my350z.com/forum/wheels-and-...re-here-2.html
https://my350z.com/forum/wheels-and-...re-here-2.html
The offset is 20 with the 8.5 and 9.5. I was thinking of 11's out back, but I think that's too wide for stock suspension. No plans to lower or camber kit it, and I still want driveability. Any other suggestions if both should be concave, or just the rear?
You could go 9.5" front and 11" rear. There are guys that go with 11" width in the rear. But if you don't want to go that wide, go 9.5" all the way around. Choose a 245 or 255 width tire up front and a 275 or 285 tire in the rear.
I have 19x8.5 +11 offset in the front and 19x9.5 +17 offset in the rear. My front wheels sit nice and just about flush with the top of the fender. My rears are about 3-5mm tucked in the fender and not as flush as the fronts. Just to give you an idea of what your sizes and offsets may look like.
I have 19x8.5 +11 offset in the front and 19x9.5 +17 offset in the rear. My front wheels sit nice and just about flush with the top of the fender. My rears are about 3-5mm tucked in the fender and not as flush as the fronts. Just to give you an idea of what your sizes and offsets may look like.
I have M310's in 9.5 front and 11 rear. Stretched @ 245/35F 275/35R Soon to stretch the rear a little more as well as the fronts
The 11's give SOOOO MUCH more concave than the 9.5's. It's worth it, trust me, I did the same debate. If you are not wanting to go lower, I would recommend not stretching your tires though.. But why wouldn't you wanna go lower? o.O
The 11's give SOOOO MUCH more concave than the 9.5's. It's worth it, trust me, I did the same debate. If you are not wanting to go lower, I would recommend not stretching your tires though.. But why wouldn't you wanna go lower? o.O
Last edited by QuintonC; Mar 19, 2013 at 04:27 PM.
I have M310's in 9.5 front and 11 rear. Stretched @ 245/35F 275/35R Soon to stretch the rear a little more as well as the fronts
The 11's give SOOOO MUCH more concave than the 9.5's. It's worth it, trust me, I did the same debate. If you are not wanting to go lower, I would recommend not stretching your tires though.. But why wouldn't you wanna go lower? o.O
The 11's give SOOOO MUCH more concave than the 9.5's. It's worth it, trust me, I did the same debate. If you are not wanting to go lower, I would recommend not stretching your tires though.. But why wouldn't you wanna go lower? o.OI think in the wheel info I've read, these 9.5's are pretty close to the same concave as the 11's in this brand. I just can't decide if all four should look concave, or just the rears. Damn. I hate these decisions!
Last edited by Edmonton 350z; Mar 20, 2013 at 12:49 PM.
Trending Topics
Bro, I'm telling you lol. The concave from the 9.5 to the 11 is MUCH different. I daily my car as well, the 11's fit without any excessive camber, my rear camber is in spec..
You can go with Avant Garde M550 9.5 square set up, as far as the concavity of the 9.5 inch and 11inch barrel They are very similar. Pm me if you have any questions
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 11
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA
Here is a picture of the 9.5 and 11's side by side for comparison
9.5 on left 11 on right
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/getyourwheels/8123454035/" title="_DSC3531 by GetYourWheels.com, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8328/8123454035_55d7d6ce61_b.jpg" width="1024" height="683" alt="_DSC3531"></a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/getyourwheels/8123471912/" title="_DSC3528 by GetYourWheels.com, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8467/8123471912_4e13e2840d_b.jpg" width="1024" height="683" alt="_DSC3528"></a>
9.5 on left 11 on right
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/getyourwheels/8123454035/" title="_DSC3531 by GetYourWheels.com, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8328/8123454035_55d7d6ce61_b.jpg" width="1024" height="683" alt="_DSC3531"></a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/getyourwheels/8123471912/" title="_DSC3528 by GetYourWheels.com, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8467/8123471912_4e13e2840d_b.jpg" width="1024" height="683" alt="_DSC3528"></a>
Last edited by Get Your Wheels; Mar 22, 2013 at 07:11 AM.
Yes it would. I have a 245 on 8.5 & it has a little stretch.
I have the M550s from Get Your Wheels in 8.5 +20 & 9.5 +20 with 245/35 & 275/35. Thinking of going 255 & 285 next time.
No hub rings needed on 9.5 & 11, but required on the 8.5.
As for the 8.5 & 9.5, I like it kind of flat in the front & concave in the rear.
I have the M550s from Get Your Wheels in 8.5 +20 & 9.5 +20 with 245/35 & 275/35. Thinking of going 255 & 285 next time.
No hub rings needed on 9.5 & 11, but required on the 8.5.
As for the 8.5 & 9.5, I like it kind of flat in the front & concave in the rear.


I am running 9.5 +5 front W/ 245 and 11 +5 rear on a 275...running -5.5 camber in the back. I could easily stretch a 255 on the rear and bring the camber somewhere into the -3's. I dont think you will be happy with a 9.5 and having to run a super negative offset and possibly even spacers to get the right fitment. Its all in what you want to look like bro...Hope these pics and offsets help you out...
<a href="http://s296.photobucket.com/user/prostr/media/350Z/IMG_6592_zps80ba8f56.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i296.photobucket.com/albums/mm199/prostr/350Z/IMG_6592_zps80ba8f56.jpg" border="0" alt="Passenger Angle photo IMG_6592_zps80ba8f56.jpg"/></a>
<a href="http://s296.photobucket.com/user/prostr/media/350Z/IMG_6591_zps154b309c.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i296.photobucket.com/albums/mm199/prostr/350Z/IMG_6591_zps154b309c.jpg" border="0" alt="Driver Angle photo IMG_6591_zps154b309c.jpg"/></a>








