Notices
Photography Techniques, Cameras, Lenses, & Equipment

Lens Recommendations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 11:35 AM
  #1  
umzzz's Avatar
umzzz
Thread Starter
Cwest Army
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
From: Rockville, MD
Default Lens Recommendations

I currently have a Canon XSI with the Canon 18-55 IS kit lens. I'm looking to upgrade to something a little better but am having some trouble in figuring out if it’s worth it. The lens I'm considering is the Tamron 17-50 f2.8. I have read this lens is sharper and produces better color and contrast than the 18-55IS canon lens but is it enough if a difference to warrant upgrading? I tend to shoot inside a fair amount so the extra aperture is appealing especially since it stays at 2.8 throughout the whole zoom range.

Any suggestions or is there another lens I may have missed? I know people recommend the canon 17-55 f2.8 but it’s about twice the price of the Tamron and I'm looking to stay around $500.

I’m also looking to get something with a bit more reach than the kit lens. Any recommendations on what I can look at? Canon 55-250 perhaps?

Thanks for your help
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #2  
stu46's Avatar
stu46
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,801
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Default

You can't go wrong with the Tammy.

Here's a pic taken with the lens.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 12:03 PM
  #3  
HKYStormFront's Avatar
HKYStormFront
New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 2
From: Greer, SC
Default

55-250's a pretty good lens other than the variable aperture. i really wish i could have used the tammy 17-50 f/2.8, it really is a good quality lens. for good inexpensive reach, check out the 70-300 IS or the 70-200 f/4 L (non IS). i've got the 70-200 and it's a really really good lens. check out some of my recent albums on my website:

jpmcgphotography.smugmug.com

only two lenses i'm really using right now are the 16-35 f/2.8 and the 70-200 f/4 L so you'll be able to tell which is which usually.

here's one of my new fav 70-200 shots ever from monday night:
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 02:39 PM
  #4  
Paul350Z's Avatar
Paul350Z
Living in 350Z
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,704
Likes: 2
From: Riverside CA
Default

"sharper and produces better color and contrast" are something normally not talked about with zoom lens but rather with prime lens. If you really want sharpness, color, contrast, less distortions (color and otherwise), and a fast lens even the cheaper fixed lens are going to out shoot those zooms costing a factor more. Less so now with the newer "wonder lens" but it still holds true.

I have a couple of zooms - a 10-20mm and an 18-200mm VR but also have fixed 10.5mm and 30mm f1.4 when I need higher quality glass. I need something in a fast 50mm now.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #5  
danlee1's Avatar
danlee1
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Ft Lauderdale, FL
Default

I just picked up the 17-55mm f/2.8 IS. Best lens purchase ever. Some pics from here:

https://my350z.com/forum/photography...lden-hour.html
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 06:07 PM
  #6  
HKYStormFront's Avatar
HKYStormFront
New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 2
From: Greer, SC
Default

Originally Posted by Paul350Z
"sharper and produces better color and contrast" are something normally not talked about with zoom lens but rather with prime lens. If you really want sharpness, color, contrast, less distortions (color and otherwise), and a fast lens even the cheaper fixed lens are going to out shoot those zooms costing a factor more. Less so now with the newer "wonder lens" but it still holds true.

I have a couple of zooms - a 10-20mm and an 18-200mm VR but also have fixed 10.5mm and 30mm f1.4 when I need higher quality glass. I need something in a fast 50mm now.
this is true but most of canon's primes other than the 50 f/1.8 and f/1.4 that are worth a damn are more than the zooms talked about above. i highly recommend everyone have at least the 50 f/1.8 it's so cheap it's a no brainer
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #7  
dj.kickz's Avatar
dj.kickz
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Default

Originally Posted by umzzz
I currently have a Canon XSI with the Canon 18-55 IS kit lens. I'm looking to upgrade to something a little better but am having some trouble in figuring out if it’s worth it. The lens I'm considering is the Tamron 17-50 f2.8. I have read this lens is sharper and produces better color and contrast than the 18-55IS canon lens but is it enough if a difference to warrant upgrading? I tend to shoot inside a fair amount so the extra aperture is appealing especially since it stays at 2.8 throughout the whole zoom range.

Any suggestions or is there another lens I may have missed? I know people recommend the canon 17-55 f2.8 but it’s about twice the price of the Tamron and I'm looking to stay around $500.

I’m also looking to get something with a bit more reach than the kit lens. Any recommendations on what I can look at? Canon 55-250 perhaps?

Thanks for your help
if you're looking to get a little more reach I've got the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 and love it. I always here people talk about the Tamron 17-55 f2.8. maybe it's supposed to be a little sharper or something. but I'm quite happy with the 28-75 and it has good reviews too.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 07:09 PM
  #8  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

cannon 70-200 f4L. You can buy it new for 600 shipped. Great investment. If you want more of a carry around lens, that tamron 28-75 f2.8 is great. I hear good review of the cannon ..28-74 f2.8 (i think thats the range), but it'll cost you a pretty penny. However, it can be your all purpose lens.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 11:46 AM
  #9  
firekrave's Avatar
firekrave
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 992
Likes: 7
From: Dallas, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by HKYStormFront
this is true but most of canon's primes other than the 50 f/1.8 and f/1.4 that are worth a damn are more than the zooms talked about above. i highly recommend everyone have at least the 50 f/1.8 it's so cheap it's a no brainer
I was hoping someone would mention this. Plus, for price, I think everyone should at least give it a shot. I love mine (even though i get funny looks now again cuz of its size compared to a 40D).
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 11:52 AM
  #10  
umzzz's Avatar
umzzz
Thread Starter
Cwest Army
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
From: Rockville, MD
Default

I actually have the 50 f1.8 which i love and use often but im looking to get something i can travel with and use as an all purpose lens which is why im asking for zoom lens recommendations. i was considering the tamron 28-75 as well however i feel like i would rather keep the 18-27 range and get a second longer range zoom in addition to it

Thanks for the recommendations everyone i will probably be picking up the tamron 17-50 soon and then looking into all the higher zoom lenses recommended
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 12:08 PM
  #11  
Jun's Avatar
Jun
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,327
Likes: 0
From: Miami/Kendall, Florida
Default

Get the tamron 17-50mm, it's a great lens.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2009 | 08:43 AM
  #12  
veightkiller's Avatar
veightkiller
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: nowehere
Default

Originally Posted by stu46
You can't go wrong with the Tammy.

Here's a pic taken with the lens.
awww adorable baby!

Last edited by veightkiller; Jun 7, 2010 at 02:31 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AbrasiveRaysive
Intake Exhaust
5
Sep 20, 2021 02:29 PM
apex locator
Autocross/Road
10
Jul 23, 2021 02:27 AM
hajwoj
Autocross/Road
27
Nov 1, 2015 05:25 PM
Detailed Image
Cleaning & Detailing
0
Sep 28, 2015 03:03 AM
SharX59
VQ35HR
5
Sep 27, 2015 09:23 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:22 PM.