Who here is getting 1/4 times of less than 13.5 without FI or NOS?
10-01-2003, 06:31 PM
#2
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Flushing
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
heh good luck. I've gotten as low as 14.019@100.81 mph (need to update my sig) with intake, exhaust, grounding kit and upgraded wheels/tires. Maybe if i got high-flow cats and the infamous crawford plenum, it would help a bit more, but in terms of mods, there isn't much more you can do... however, rumor has it the track at LI motorsports is about .1 - .2 slower than what your true time may be... but i think it is very hard to get 13.5 NA. Someone claimed to run 13.6 bone stock with their z, but no timeslip = bs. Most stock Z's are running around 14.1 - 14.3.
10-01-2003, 09:01 PM
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most does not = all. Obviously it depends on track, temp, humidity, and elevation. My car stock went 13.8 @ 103 as do most of the ther Z's around here with the few exceptional drivers hitting 13.7 and 13.6's. Then there are the newbies runing 14.4 to 15.5 that need more practice.
10-02-2003, 12:20 PM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hendersonville, NC
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought most 350's dyno at 240-245 to the wheels stock?? Sounds right to me, I guess he is a good driver to bump the rev limiter, in 90 degree weather and still run a 13.6. I think mid 13's is in the car with a GOOD driver.
edit: Briguy, arent u the guy who raced WisS2k or whatever his name was off s2ki.com?
edit: Briguy, arent u the guy who raced WisS2k or whatever his name was off s2ki.com?
Trending Topics
10-02-2003, 12:49 PM
#8
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by JP00SS
edit: Briguy, arent u the guy who raced WisS2k or whatever his name was off s2ki.com?
edit: Briguy, arent u the guy who raced WisS2k or whatever his name was off s2ki.com?
10-02-2003, 05:11 PM
#10
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by JP00SS
Yeah. CLS on this board raced his friend in a S2000 from a stop and from a few diff mph roll ons. Wasn't pretty for the S2000.
Yeah. CLS on this board raced his friend in a S2000 from a stop and from a few diff mph roll ons. Wasn't pretty for the S2000.
That's about right...the S2000 guys that swear the S2k is quicker than a 350Z are delusional.....
10-03-2003, 06:05 AM
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: port richey Fl.
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by BriGuyMax
That's about right...the S2000 guys that swear the S2k is quicker than a 350Z are delusional.....
That's about right...the S2000 guys that swear the S2k is quicker than a 350Z are delusional.....
10-03-2003, 09:07 AM
#13
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by typeR
not quicker but right about on par...but much harder to extract all the potential out of it than the Z, the 2004 should put up an even better fight
not quicker but right about on par...but much harder to extract all the potential out of it than the Z, the 2004 should put up an even better fight
The 2004 has yet to even be tested...so it's all speculation right now.
10-03-2003, 10:32 AM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: port richey Fl.
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by BriGuyMax
I disagree....my friend drives the crap out of his S2k....he's the person who originally taught me how to drive a manual and I have no problem pulling on him. Actually his car is about dead even with a Stang GT.
The 2004 has yet to even be tested...so it's all speculation right now.
I disagree....my friend drives the crap out of his S2k....he's the person who originally taught me how to drive a manual and I have no problem pulling on him. Actually his car is about dead even with a Stang GT.
The 2004 has yet to even be tested...so it's all speculation right now.
10-03-2003, 03:35 PM
#15
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by typeR
well i have seen a couple 13.8's and alot of 14.2 's so to me it sounds even...however the S2k has to be launched hard and from a roll i dont think you get a true comparo to 1/4 mile capabilities sorta like saying i beat an STi from a 50 mph roll but if he launched on you at 5K + he'd have put 2-3 cars that you'd be trying to make up
well i have seen a couple 13.8's and alot of 14.2 's so to me it sounds even...however the S2k has to be launched hard and from a roll i dont think you get a true comparo to 1/4 mile capabilities sorta like saying i beat an STi from a 50 mph roll but if he launched on you at 5K + he'd have put 2-3 cars that you'd be trying to make up
The first year that the S2k came out ('99) I don't think I even heard about any 13 second passes. Average was high 14s and good was low 14s.....plenty of Zs have hit 13s and pretty much all 6-speed Zs trap over 100mph stock...not something you can say for the S2ks....
10-03-2003, 03:52 PM
#17
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by EnthuZiast
Nobody is and nobody will be.
Nobody is and nobody will be.
Last edited by BriGuyMax; 10-03-2003 at 03:55 PM.
10-04-2003, 07:06 AM
#20
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by max2000jp
S2K and the Z are pretty equally matched. The Z is about .2 quicker down the 1/4, so it all comes down to the driver.
S2K and the Z are pretty equally matched. The Z is about .2 quicker down the 1/4, so it all comes down to the driver.