Notices
Tuning Reflashes, Piggybacks, Standalone ECUs

NA UTEC tune yesterday - dynos inside!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2005, 10:03 AM
  #1  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default NA UTEC tune yesterday - dynos inside!!!

Got a chance to install and tune the UTEC yesterday on my car.

Mods are: Gruppe-M intake, Ultimate Racing high flow cats, Ultimate Racing Y pipe, Fujitsubo titanium exhaust, Unorthodox crank pulley. We have not yet swapped my heads over to the new 'crazy" setup, so these #'s are with stock heads, stock plenum, stock cams, stock manifolds in place. Everything on the car now is the same as it was then, save for the catback (I was using an Apexi Hybrid Megaphone exhaust then). I also have not installed the clutch/flywheel yet (OS Giken single plate) into this car. Spark plugs are factory originals with 41k miles on them since new (might start tuning with a fresh set of Iridiums next week if time permits).

Big thanks go out to everyone at ICS for working with me yesterday and letting me monopolize the dyno for the whole morning/night. Very nice guys and we are going to be doing quite a bit of developmental stuff with them in terms of tuning in the near future.

So onto the results!!!!

Baselines were done around 10:30 AM - weather stayed the same all day. After a lot of car talk, lunch, and a couple other cars visiting the dyno too, we wrapped up around 6 PM.

As a point of reference this is a brand new Dynojet machine (4WD model) - a bone stock STi runs 222 whp on this dyno.

Not sure how well these will scan, so if it's difficult to read, here are how the numbers worked out

Baseline (mods listed above and AAM flashed ecu): 242.34 whp, 236/16 ft/lbs
zUTEC Tuned: 254.84 whp, 241.26 ft lbs. These are SAE Corrected #'s.

Uncorrected: basline of 249.55 whp, 243.19 ft/lbs
zUTEC Tuned: 261.81 whp, 247.86 ft/lbs

The biggest difference from looking at the charts is clear though. After tuning, there are no spots in the rev range where we made less whp or less torque. The most prolific gains are up top, where the car needs it most.

The goals here were pretty simple - we want to build a database of workable NA maps that will serve as the basis for our tuning program to follow with our 2 in house Z's, as well as customer cars.

Click here for the dynos:
http://www.z1auto.com/images/scan.pdf

Next up - going to inspect my plugs, maybe try something else out, and get these new heads swapped on (just have to find the time, as we are getting to work on another one of my cars starting this week). Look for the results on the heads/cams in the next couple months.

So, what are my impressions? Very simple. There is no better bang for the buck mod than a UTEC, and IMHO, it should be the basis on which your future mods are executed. Whether you go NA or FI, nitrous, or not, a UTEC should be part of the equation. Thisis one of those mods that serves as the foundation for whatever your future Z plans hold. I am so excited now to finally get these heads/cams/headers on the car with the new clutch/flywheel

Happy New Years everyone!!

Adam, Kwame, Jon, Bill, Mike

Last edited by Z1 Performance; 12-31-2005 at 10:11 AM.
Old 12-31-2005, 10:18 AM
  #2  
kamikaZ
3FIFTYZ
iTrader: (19)
 
kamikaZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Rockville
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds good. Where are you guys located at? I have pretty much all NA bolt ons and the AAM reflash and I am making very little power so I am definitely interested in a good tune.
Old 12-31-2005, 10:26 AM
  #3  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

we are on LI, ICS is in Stamford CT
Old 12-31-2005, 10:27 AM
  #4  
southern_info
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
southern_info's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very nice numbers!
Old 12-31-2005, 10:30 AM
  #5  
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Julian@MRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Spotswood NJ
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice gains Adam,
We will be contributing to the map library soon..We got a N/A Z we will be tunning in the next few weeks..


WWW.RACEMRC.COM
For your 350z/G35 performance needs.
Authorized Turbo XS UTEC distributors
Authorized Dyno Dynamics load based tunning facility comming 3/06!!
Authorizes Greddy Dealer/Installer
Authorized GTSPEC dealer
Authorized Unlimited Tuning Revolution dealer
Authorized Speed Force Racing Dealer


Email: Sales@racemrc.com
AIM: salesmrc
Phone: 732-251-8200
Mobile: 732-558-4560
MRC MOTORSPORTS
116 Main St.
Spotswood NJ 08884
Old 12-31-2005, 10:45 AM
  #6  
kamikaZ
3FIFTYZ
iTrader: (19)
 
kamikaZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Rockville
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can you give me an idea of how much it would cost if I came down to MRC and had the UTEC installed and tuned?
Old 12-31-2005, 10:48 AM
  #7  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

why not PM them
Old 12-31-2005, 11:04 AM
  #8  
kamikaZ
3FIFTYZ
iTrader: (19)
 
kamikaZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Rockville
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

True.
Old 12-31-2005, 11:42 AM
  #9  
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Julian@MRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Spotswood NJ
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Adam,

Did you find the base map very conservative and the knock sensitivity very high?
Old 12-31-2005, 12:31 PM
  #10  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

the base map was pretty good, but my car asked for alot more timing advance. I left knock sensivity as it comes...I don't like to mess with it on any UTEC tunes we do. As a starting point though, it is awesome and off the bat made more power than my flash.
Old 12-31-2005, 12:55 PM
  #11  
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Julian@MRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Spotswood NJ
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
the base map was pretty good, but my car asked for alot more timing advance. I left knock sensivity as it comes...I don't like to mess with it on any UTEC tunes we do. As a starting point though, it is awesome and off the bat made more power than my flash.
Sounds cool..It does seem that the Z in N/A form likes timing advance, we made 290 whp 2 years ago with Jays car when we were testing the Perfect Power SMT6..I wish the UTEC was around then..
The problem now is everyone in our shop wnet F/I, we have no more N/A Z's to tune with..
Old 12-31-2005, 01:07 PM
  #12  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

we're the reverse! Both our in house 350Z's are strictly going with heavily modded NA setupsand we are working with a few customers in various parts of the country on some NA builds as well
Old 12-31-2005, 01:08 PM
  #13  
Nathan
New Member
 
Nathan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
the base map was pretty good, but my car asked for alot more timing advance. I left knock sensivity as it comes...I don't like to mess with it on any UTEC tunes we do. As a starting point though, it is awesome and off the bat made more power than my flash.
How were you doing the fuel ? MAF manipulation, or the MAP option
Old 12-31-2005, 01:34 PM
  #14  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

the car is NA.....there is no MAP provision for NA
Old 01-01-2006, 02:32 PM
  #15  
Nathan
New Member
 
Nathan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
the car is NA.....there is no MAP provision for NA
Thats not what they are telling me out here in Australia.

Will Know a lot more on Jan 18th as they plan a big dyno & info day that day.

So far they have not released it here as the demand from you US agents has been so great that all units made here in Sydney are exported
Old 01-01-2006, 02:52 PM
  #16  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I think you might have misunderstood them then

The UTEC for NA cars relies on the stock MAF.

On the forced induction cars, you can purchase the MAP sensor, at which point it uses the MAF cor tuning zones in vacuum, and the MAP for tuning zones under boost.
Old 01-01-2006, 09:54 PM
  #17  
Nathan
New Member
 
Nathan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
I think you might have misunderstood them then

The UTEC for NA cars relies on the stock MAF.

On the forced induction cars, you can purchase the MAP sensor, at which point it uses the MAF cor tuning zones in vacuum, and the MAP for tuning zones under boost.
When testing there own mildly modified NA Z, data logging of the MAF voltage showed a voltage of 4.8V.
Very close to the max of 5.0V.
A larger intake pipe with a MAF sensor opening, eliminating the plastic MAF housing was going to be an option but the MAP option has worked out cheaper
The big downside of the MAP option is dyno time, but once the map libarary has been built up this will help

Are the heads you have ready to put on the 46cc Nismo ones ?
If so I can assist you with tappet clearance problems
Old 01-01-2006, 10:13 PM
  #18  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Yes my logs showed similar values for MAF as I recall - but its not worrisome to me unless I get to 5 volts

no I did not do the NISMO heads - bought a spare set of stock heads, did lots of porting, custom work on the upper, middle and lower plenums and a set of tomei cams. Hopefully we'll have them installed by spring
Old 01-01-2006, 11:48 PM
  #19  
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
thawk408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Does the UTEC come with a base map? I have heard stories about the UTEC sending to much voltage and frying the coil packs. Not sure if this is true, but that is what I have heard from some subaru drivers.
Old 01-02-2006, 07:45 AM
  #20  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

anyone who has experienced a coilpack go bad on a WRX has something off in their mapping. I've experienced it myself, so I know this very well

Yes the UTEC comes with a base map for intake and exhaust


Quick Reply: NA UTEC tune yesterday - dynos inside!!!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:32 AM.