Osiris Tune Results! Church Automotive With Video
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego/Italy
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Osiris Tune Results! Church Automotive *Video*
What a day. I drove up to Church in the morning to get tuned. 1 block from the shop, I hit a NASTY pothole and blew out 2 tires (Passenger side front & rear). Thankfully, Ryan @ Church took me to a nearby tire shop to get me going. That was real nice of him.
Mods are:
K&N Drop In
Motordyne 5/16 Spacer Iso Thermal MREV2
X02 Exhaust with Magnaflow resonated X-pipe
Resonated test pipes
Driving Impression
As you can see, low and mid range torque was vastly improved. This is something I noticed right away when driving home. Cruising on the freeway on the stock tune around 2500-3000 rpm felt like it just didn't want to go. A lot better now on the performance tune. Now it feels alive at cruising speeds. upon exiting the toll booth, I had a wide open area with almost no on around. Took up to the top of third. Boy was I happy.
Gains
Only gained a few peak horspower but look at the graph at around 5600 RPM. A good 25+ hp gain in that area. Also take at look at the tq graph around 3k and 3700 rpm.
Also, take a look at the AFR. Sean said I was running very lean due to having test pipes.
***Edit***
Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icbzSlrNdBc
Mods are:
K&N Drop In
Motordyne 5/16 Spacer Iso Thermal MREV2
X02 Exhaust with Magnaflow resonated X-pipe
Resonated test pipes
Driving Impression
As you can see, low and mid range torque was vastly improved. This is something I noticed right away when driving home. Cruising on the freeway on the stock tune around 2500-3000 rpm felt like it just didn't want to go. A lot better now on the performance tune. Now it feels alive at cruising speeds. upon exiting the toll booth, I had a wide open area with almost no on around. Took up to the top of third. Boy was I happy.
Gains
Only gained a few peak horspower but look at the graph at around 5600 RPM. A good 25+ hp gain in that area. Also take at look at the tq graph around 3k and 3700 rpm.
Also, take a look at the AFR. Sean said I was running very lean due to having test pipes.
***Edit***
Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icbzSlrNdBc
Last edited by Jairen; 02-20-2010 at 09:48 PM.
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hahaha na man. I looked at all the other Z's and G's on his comp lol SOME came close, but mine so far is the highest bolt on Z he has seen, my tuner said only one that came close had cams and was at 285whp, we were both happy to see gains i got. Talking DE engines ofc. Now imagine if i was using 93 octane like u, pretty sure i would be at 285.
Trending Topics
#9
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego/Italy
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For anyone thinking of getting this done, I'd highly recommend it. Driving around at low to mid RPM's is amazing now. Take a second look at the tq graphs at 2500, 3000, and 3800 RPMS. Almost feels like an HR.
#11
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego/Italy
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#12
Banned
iTrader: (10)
Very good gains, peak hp only last maybe 2 sec then shift, but thats alot of usable power and torque there man.
Not to be a pooper but your low speed driving around impressions are at part throttle right? But this dyno plot is of wot right? Did the tune also alter other throttle % areas, for cruising? Or was all tuning done wot?
Not to be a pooper but your low speed driving around impressions are at part throttle right? But this dyno plot is of wot right? Did the tune also alter other throttle % areas, for cruising? Or was all tuning done wot?
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Jay, glad you are happy with the tune!
For reference guys, Dynapacks are supposed to read higher than roller dynos. That's simply how it works because you are removing the wheels and tires which sap power on a roller.
If you'd like the physics of it, you can visit my website. There is also a great reference article from the the SAE (www.sae.gov - do a search) called "Listening to the Voice of the Consumer - Chassis Dynos". In this SAE paper they specifically measure all the different losses from crank to roller. In particular, the loss from wheel/tire weight/inertia, strap down tension and tire contact patch losses account for up to half of the losses on a roller dyno. Since the Dynapack removes all those things it should read higher. If it didn't something is wrong.
So please, before making trite comments about "high reading dynos", please make sure you understand how they work.
SC
For reference guys, Dynapacks are supposed to read higher than roller dynos. That's simply how it works because you are removing the wheels and tires which sap power on a roller.
If you'd like the physics of it, you can visit my website. There is also a great reference article from the the SAE (www.sae.gov - do a search) called "Listening to the Voice of the Consumer - Chassis Dynos". In this SAE paper they specifically measure all the different losses from crank to roller. In particular, the loss from wheel/tire weight/inertia, strap down tension and tire contact patch losses account for up to half of the losses on a roller dyno. Since the Dynapack removes all those things it should read higher. If it didn't something is wrong.
So please, before making trite comments about "high reading dynos", please make sure you understand how they work.
SC
#15
350Z-holic
iTrader: (25)
Hi Jay, glad you are happy with the tune!
For reference guys, Dynapacks are supposed to read higher than roller dynos. That's simply how it works because you are removing the wheels and tires which sap power on a roller.
If you'd like the physics of it, you can visit my website. There is also a great reference article from the the SAE (www.sae.gov - do a search) called "Listening to the Voice of the Consumer - Chassis Dynos". In this SAE paper they specifically measure all the different losses from crank to roller. In particular, the loss from wheel/tire weight/inertia, strap down tension and tire contact patch losses account for up to half of the losses on a roller dyno. Since the Dynapack removes all those things it should read higher. If it didn't something is wrong.
So please, before making trite comments about "high reading dynos", please make sure you understand how they work.
SC
For reference guys, Dynapacks are supposed to read higher than roller dynos. That's simply how it works because you are removing the wheels and tires which sap power on a roller.
If you'd like the physics of it, you can visit my website. There is also a great reference article from the the SAE (www.sae.gov - do a search) called "Listening to the Voice of the Consumer - Chassis Dynos". In this SAE paper they specifically measure all the different losses from crank to roller. In particular, the loss from wheel/tire weight/inertia, strap down tension and tire contact patch losses account for up to half of the losses on a roller dyno. Since the Dynapack removes all those things it should read higher. If it didn't something is wrong.
So please, before making trite comments about "high reading dynos", please make sure you understand how they work.
SC
#17
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had mine tuned up there and i loved it. Dude i was swerving like crazy the streets around that area are really bad. IM glad i didnt blow any tires .
IM in san diego too lets meet up!!!!! I would like to take a ride in a G and see the difference.
IM in san diego too lets meet up!!!!! I would like to take a ride in a G and see the difference.
#18
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego/Italy
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If your ever bored on the weekends or hit up Qualcomm, let me know. I usually just hang out on the weekends with the family.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post