Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

general question about 07+ Z...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 03:26 PM
  #1  
ginobetterfly's Avatar
ginobetterfly
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: SOCAL
Default general question about 07+ Z...

Im really scared to post this cause i fear this is gonna turn into another auto vs manual thread, BUT... i have an 05 enth auto (non rev) and am considering selling it or trading it in for an 07+ manual..

I love my car, but it is just too damn slow... so i want something else. I had the spacer, exhaust, TPs, intake on my 05 auto and really didnt see a big improvement over stock...

Now I dont need to go super fast, and im wondering if getting an 07+ manual and some NA bolt-ons (spacer, intake, HFCs/TPs, exhaust) and a good tune will get me a noticable increase in performance.... or should i just look at some other cars all together??

I would really love to hear peoples opinions on this... especially the people that went from an 03-06 auto to an 07+ stick.

Thanks in advance

p.s. another reason im looking into another Z is because i have a pretty killer audio setup in my current Z that i dont want to sell and can just tear it all out and put it into the new Z.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 03:57 PM
  #2  
NISMO_558's Avatar
NISMO_558
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,003
Likes: 4
From: Minnesota
Default

FYI, theres no "spacers" for the HR, and 300whp is obtainable with a CAI, test pipes, exhaust and a a tune or reflash.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 05:23 PM
  #3  
ginobetterfly's Avatar
ginobetterfly
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: SOCAL
Default

Originally Posted by 350z_racer05
FYI, theres no "spacers" for the HR, and 300whp is obtainable with a CAI, test pipes, exhaust and a a tune or reflash.
thats right... i thought they fixed the "problem" for the 07+, but wasnt sure...

300 at the wheels would be sick, but it sounds too good to be true..
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #4  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

With respect I think the DE vs HR motor is pretty well played out.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #5  
Spork's Avatar
Spork
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 27,592
Likes: 6
From: MN
Default

The HR responds better to less.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 08:28 PM
  #6  
johns350's Avatar
johns350
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Southlake, Texas
Default How slow is slow?

If you are really disappointed in your current ride, I'm not sure if a '07+ is going to satisfy. Take one for a drive - see for youself.

Now - if you are saying that you simply would rather have a manual instead of an auto - so be it. But there is not a substancial difference in performance between the two.

If you want significantly more straight line performance, you might think of (flame on!) a 'vette...or something along those lines....

Good Luck
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 10:29 PM
  #7  
ladyzed's Avatar
ladyzed
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 573
Likes: 1
From: Kamloops BC
Default

Yes. I still think my mostly stock 04.5 is fast LOL. I am still awaiting my plenum from Kinetix to be re-gasketed, and add some NISMO stickers, then I'll see 300whp.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 04:29 AM
  #8  
KManZ's Avatar
KManZ
Banned
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
Default

Comparing HR to DE, it's not as big of difference as you think.

Edit: I mean that in regards to your "butt-dyno", there isn't a huge difference. Among other things, in terms of actual engine components (80% revised), higher redline, and a slightly better response to mods, then yes, there is a noticeable difference.

Last edited by KManZ; Oct 25, 2008 at 10:50 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 07:52 AM
  #9  
jhu2818's Avatar
jhu2818
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

There is definitely a noticeable difference but its not that much. Test drive and compare?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #10  
AFG's Avatar
AFG
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by jhu2818
There is definitely a noticeable difference but its not that much. Test drive and compare?
Huge difference IMHO
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 12:59 AM
  #11  
GHOST1207's Avatar
GHOST1207
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
From: SoCal/High Desert Area
Default

First gear WOT pulls pretty hard to me and HR can get 300 hp with a tune and couple mods, a member A.H. has 316 to the wheels I think.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XM 1
Engine & Drivetrain
29
Jul 10, 2022 07:44 AM
burglapfd
Maintenance & Repair
9
Dec 6, 2020 01:04 PM
issyz
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
6
Jul 2, 2017 03:04 PM
Alexreyes
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
13
Sep 30, 2015 11:30 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:20 PM.