Anyone Have non-Press 35th AE Pics
12-19-2004, 06:21 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone Have non-Press 35th AE Pics
I know some people here have the car, so I thought I have read, but cannot find any pics. Are any non-Nissan press pics floating around here?
Thanks.
Thanks.
12-20-2004, 05:11 AM
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you. I've seen the SEMA pics, too.
Now I know why I have not seen anything else. It is not February.
I previously thought someone else said they already had the car. From what I understand it will be close to $40k, loaded!
Now I know why I have not seen anything else. It is not February.
I previously thought someone else said they already had the car. From what I understand it will be close to $40k, loaded!
12-20-2004, 06:34 AM
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a link I found on another forum...
Kinda disappointing about not so special "special badging"...
Courtesy Parts
Kinda disappointing about not so special "special badging"...
Courtesy Parts
Trending Topics
12-20-2004, 01:36 PM
#9
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow. I cant believe Nissan didnt pony up the cash to come out with a very distinctive badge. I am with mc350z. I will take my flat black, silver circle Z emblem anyday.
12-21-2004, 09:55 AM
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Windsor, Connecticut
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by BaTMan_4
...on the Nissan site it says it has 300hp?? What did they do to get the extra ponies??
...on the Nissan site it says it has 300hp?? What did they do to get the extra ponies??
But with the 300 hp you lose a bunch of torque....no thanks Nissan! I expected more...
12-22-2004, 04:36 AM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Windsor, Connecticut
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
True, but you want tourque down low....
That's what it's used for. Once you get up high enough the HP takes over, and the tourque is doing very little for you.
That's what it's used for. Once you get up high enough the HP takes over, and the tourque is doing very little for you.
12-22-2004, 01:50 PM
#14
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NOR*CAL
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Neither of you have any real idea about the performance because the car is not released and independant dynos have not been done. So arguing about whether or not it has more torque here or there is just plain stupid at this point.
12-22-2004, 07:47 PM
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by zpeed350
True, but you want tourque down low....
That's what it's used for. Once you get up high enough the HP takes over, and the tourque is doing very little for you.
True, but you want tourque down low....
That's what it's used for. Once you get up high enough the HP takes over, and the tourque is doing very little for you.
sigh...
most "race" motors make way more HP than torque - and at higher RPMs.
I'll leave you to think about why that is....
12-23-2004, 03:00 AM
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: california
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have no dyno plot, however..we know that the standard engine produces 243.1 pounds at 6200 rpms (287hpX5252/6200) and the new version produces 246.2 pounds at 6400 rpms (300hpX5252/6400). So it is making 3.1 pounds more torque even@200 rpms later.
12-27-2004, 12:59 PM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My site has a few I took a few months ago at a private Ocean Drive party. Sorry for the quality
http://jdmugen0.tripod.com/id18.html
http://jdmugen0.tripod.com/id18.html
