Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Owned by Subaru STi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:07 PM
  #41  
Lonerider's Avatar
Lonerider
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: US
Default

You all really think the Sti looks ugly?
That is harsh. I think it looks nice and it is unique.

The Sti's performance is a tad bit better than the Z (assuming both are in stock form). This is no secret.

Honestly I think both cars were designed for different purposes though.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #42  
Armitage's Avatar
Armitage
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 3
From: North Jersey
Default

From what I've read, they have all their power lower in the powerband. They don't have much oomph up top, which is why a lot of cars can take them from a roll.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 09:32 AM
  #43  
PhoenixINX's Avatar
PhoenixINX
New Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally posted by Armitage
From what I've read, they have all their power lower in the powerband. They don't have much oomph up top, which is why a lot of cars can take them from a roll.
STi's and EVO's have PLENTY of power up top...

They pull to redline, unlike ours Z which do not.

btw... I haven't "read" this... I've worked with them on the dyno, and driven plenty.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 09:34 AM
  #44  
orhanz33's Avatar
orhanz33
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Default

Originally posted by bobS
My buddy has a sti, its fast, sounds badass, but wait till i get my TT, i spent 28k on my touring with 10k miles on it, spend another 6 grand and i'll have a amazing looking TT japanese sports car *drool*
it's gonna cost a lot more then that but definately amazing when all is said and done
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 10:01 AM
  #45  
FormulaRX's Avatar
FormulaRX
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Upland, CA
Default

I drove the mad crap out of an STI and EVO 8 during a dealer test drive (the salesman owned a modded EVO 8 w/ 3" Greddy cat back, cams, ecu, etc...) and so it was no surprise that he didn't crap his pants or have a heart attack when I redlined each gear and took it up to about 120mph on the back roads. They are nice cars and in my opinion, I would take the EVO 8 (white with black leather Recaro interior) over the STI anyday, however having a 2-door coupe is still nicer for cruising and picking up chicks! I love the Z!!!
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 10:01 AM
  #46  
SOCAL350's Avatar
SOCAL350
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clarita - Lake Forest
Default

I had an STI hang me out to dry the other week from a stop. They are just sick cars.........to bad they look like old Jetta's. Its just like sticking big ***** on an ugly chick.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 12:02 PM
  #47  
StarcraftBW's Avatar
StarcraftBW
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
Default

My friend has a evo 8 and fully mods (header, exhaust, reflash-ecu, upgrade turbo kits e.t.c = more than 40k total) and he is about to sell his car to get a Z track + turbo later. The reasons is too much turbo lag for a short range shift. Evo + STI are good cars but 2.5 turbo can't compare to 3.5 with bigger turbo.....all will cost you roughly 40k. This is my .02 cent opinion.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 01:38 PM
  #48  
FormulaRX's Avatar
FormulaRX
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Upland, CA
Default

Originally posted by StarcraftBW
My friend has a evo 8 and fully mods (header, exhaust, reflash-ecu, upgrade turbo kits e.t.c = more than 40k total) and he is about to sell his car to get a Z track + turbo later. The reasons is too much turbo lag for a short range shift. Evo + STI are good cars but 2.5 turbo can't compare to 3.5 with bigger turbo.....all will cost you roughly 40k. This is my .02 cent opinion.
All very true...plus a 2-door sports car will always have more sex appeal than a 4-door sedan, yes even the M5
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 04:57 PM
  #49  
krismax's Avatar
krismax
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: amsterdam ny
Default

Guy i know runs high 12's bone stock with sti that car pulls hard. TWo perfect drivers in the z and the sti the sti will win but id still take the Z
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 06:12 PM
  #50  
tjr's Avatar
tjr
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: stl
Default

I had an STi for about a year and just traded it for an '05 Enthusiast. There is NOTHING overrated about the power of an STi. If you have lived with it for a while, it is very difficult to get owned by anyone. Before that I had a WRX and the power difference down low and up high was impressive. It is a difficult car to drive every day - everything is very raw, you can feel paint stripes in the pavement thru the suspension. The Z is much more liveable every day - maybe not as practical, but much more relaxed.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 09:07 PM
  #51  
psantos's Avatar
psantos
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

i took one on the freeway by a little, i've ran two so far. try taking off from 100mph+... i know it sounds stupid, but you should be able to beat them top end. it's true too. my boy owns a sti. off the line, we don't have a chance STOCK.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM
BOATS N HOES
Lighting
1
Oct 13, 2015 09:07 AM
MicVelo
NorCal Marketplace
9
Oct 4, 2015 07:55 PM
Mattg350z
Buying/Leasing
4
Oct 2, 2015 06:51 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:36 AM.