Netko350Z

iTrader: (8)

I was wondering what the differences in dyno's are. I know that the Dynopack attaches to the wheel hubs and quotes figures that are 10-15% higher than normal.

What about Dynojet's and Mustang Dyno's
Differences?


Thanks.

Netko350Z

iTrader: (8)

You saying no one knows the difference?????????


Come on gear heads!!!

FairladyZ

Just dyno on a dynojet sae corrected. Lower than std but most accurate. A mustang dyno uses load so it generally dynos lower than dynojet numbers.

Armitage

iTrader: (15)

Here's my understanding of the different dyno's:

Dynopack - Measures hp at the wheels, but bolts onto the hubs, not taking into effect the weight and rotational mass of the rims/tires. Typically gives you the highest results.

Dynojet - Measures hp at the wheels, with the rims/tires still on. Numbers tend to be lower than the Dynopack because of the added weight of the rims/tires.

Mustang Dyno - Measures hp at he wheels, with the rims/tires still on. However these dyno's work, they usually dyno the lowest of all types of dynos. Why? I have no idea to be honest.

Tips for dynoing:

- Always get your numbers SAE corrected for atmospheric conditions.
- Dyno in 5th for manuals, 4th for auto's.

Netko350Z

iTrader: (8)

The Mustang dyno gave me a 230hp!!


WTF!!!!

ZBoater

And what exactly were you expecting? You have to realize that the same car taken to six different dynos will give you six different numbers with a variance of as much as 30hp between the extremes. There is some article I read linked from a post here some months back. There is no such thing as an absolute number that stock Zs (or any other Z for that matter) should dyno at. We can talk AVERAGES all day long, but that is going to be +/- 10/15hp.

Just for grins I took a look at a dyno thread and pulled out all the stock dyno numbers (they didnt state whether mustang, dynojet or SAE corrected) and this is what I found:

Year hp torque
???? 230 219
???? 230 220
2003 230 230
2004 231 224
???? 233 227
2003 235 230
???? 236 228
2003 238 228
2003 242 240
???? 242 238
???? 243 240
2003 244 236

Average 236 230

Take it for what its worth (which isnt much).