0-60 2006 350Z Times
2006 Nissan 350Z: Reviews & Specs
Track 2dr Hatchback (3.5L 6cyl 6M).-
Performance
Acceleration (0-60 mph): 5.93 sec.
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2006/niss...ch.0.3.Nissan*
Track 2dr Hatchback (3.5L 6cyl 6M).-
Performance
Acceleration (0-60 mph): 5.93 sec.
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2006/niss...ch.0.3.Nissan*
the earlier models were like... 5.4 seconds from 0-60
as with all cars they grow fatter and get more horsepower and doesnt do anything but go slower...
the 2003 Zed car was definately the quickest @ 5.4 seconds 0-60 tested
as with all cars they grow fatter and get more horsepower and doesnt do anything but go slower...
the 2003 Zed car was definately the quickest @ 5.4 seconds 0-60 tested
Guest
Posts: n/a
5.93 
thats shameful
i think motortrend tested a 2004 track model that did 0-60 in 5.3 and the 1/4 in 13.77 . those are the best #'s any magazine has ever done on a stock Z. so thats what im quoting.
i think the best i saw for a 2006 was 5.68 or something like that
isnt there a way to take 1/8 miles or 60ft times and put them into a formula for 0-60?
thats shamefuli think motortrend tested a 2004 track model that did 0-60 in 5.3 and the 1/4 in 13.77 . those are the best #'s any magazine has ever done on a stock Z. so thats what im quoting.
i think the best i saw for a 2006 was 5.68 or something like that
isnt there a way to take 1/8 miles or 60ft times and put them into a formula for 0-60?
Last edited by **; Jan 13, 2006 at 08:21 PM.
LOL
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by mc350z
5.93 thats shameful
i think motortrend tested a 2004 track model that did 0-60 in 5.3 and the 1/4 in 13.77 . those are the best #'s any magazine has ever done on a stock Z. so thats what im quoting.
i think the best i saw for a 2006 was 5.68 or something like that
isnt there a way to take 1/8 miles or 60ft times and put them into a formula for 0-60?
thats shamefuli think motortrend tested a 2004 track model that did 0-60 in 5.3 and the 1/4 in 13.77 . those are the best #'s any magazine has ever done on a stock Z. so thats what im quoting.
i think the best i saw for a 2006 was 5.68 or something like that
isnt there a way to take 1/8 miles or 60ft times and put them into a formula for 0-60?
A stock Z (regardless of which model/year) is in the range of 5.7-5.3
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
Sport Z Magazine
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 48
From: Oceanside Ca
Originally Posted by scarface9
+1 It depends on who drove the Z. Most magazine times sux.
A stock Z (regardless of which model/year) is in the range of 5.7-5.3
A stock Z (regardless of which model/year) is in the range of 5.7-5.3
Originally Posted by zland
Just remember that the other cars in the mag are driven by them so the times are relatively accurate compared to other cars.
Guest
Posts: n/a
ive always wondered the process myself. how many runs to they do for a car. i mean do they hop in the car and run it a couple times and say ok that'll work. or do they run the hell out of the car until they get a good time? because its all about the launch and as people who do any kind of drag know launches can vary alot from time to time
Originally Posted by angelzhope720
rsx type s is lightest honda. even lighter than s2000. of course it'll have the weight advantage.
True, but at least it'll look nice, and nothing some suspension upgrades to counteract torque steer & front wheel drive that won't help to get it around a track. Can't wait to see what the aftermarket companies have planned for the new civic.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
From: OR
Originally Posted by Alberto
I believe the new Si is lighter, with an LSD and just as much potential....
Last edited by JunJTan; Jan 14, 2006 at 01:37 AM.
