Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Z lap times at Nurburing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 07:28 AM
  #41  
ZlleH's Avatar
ZlleH
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,589
Likes: 1
From: Ottawa, Canada
Default

We were discussing an Acura NSX to a Nissan 350Z lap time. Now you want to compare a Honda NSX-R to a Nissan 350Z lap time? If you want to be fair, then take 400 pounds off the 350Z because that's one of the difference between the Acura NSX and the Honda NSX-R, 400 pounds weight reduction.



Originally Posted by CDR_UK
NSX-R is 7.56 and will beat a Z on a track 8 day's a week.

In Europe, the 35th 350Z was developped on the Nurburgring, and is 2 seconds a lap faster than the normal 287hp track version.

Last edited by ZlleH; Feb 2, 2006 at 07:36 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 09:30 AM
  #42  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by ZlleH
We were discussing an Acura NSX to a Nissan 350Z lap time. Now you want to compare a Honda NSX-R to a Nissan 350Z lap time? If you want to be fair, then take 400 pounds off the 350Z because that's one of the difference between the Acura NSX and the Honda NSX-R, 400 pounds weight reduction.
Is the Honda NSX lighter then the Acura NSX. The Acura weighs 3150 and the Honda NSX-R is 2800. If the Honda NSX is lighter then the Acura, then it will be less then a 400 pound difference.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 09:32 AM
  #43  
ANXIOUZ's Avatar
ANXIOUZ
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

It's the "R" stuff that makes it lighter, not the Acura/Honda label.

The JP NSX-R kicks the US NSX's azz.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 10:12 AM
  #44  
buho62's Avatar
buho62
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: WDM, IA
Default

Originally Posted by maximZ
It's the "R" stuff that makes it lighter, not the Acura/Honda label.

The JP NSX-R kicks the US NSX's azz.

Any JP car model kicks the US car model!


Some people call it emissions control?
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 10:14 AM
  #45  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by maximZ
It's the "R" stuff that makes it lighter, not the Acura/Honda label.

The JP NSX-R kicks the US NSX's azz.
Yes I realize this. I was more going for the weight difference. The Acura NSX and the Honda NSX-R have a 350 pound difference. Now if the Honda NSX is lighter then the Acura NSX, the difference would be less.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 11:23 AM
  #46  
ZlleH's Avatar
ZlleH
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,589
Likes: 1
From: Ottawa, Canada
Default

LOL, sorry, it's 350 pounds lighter, not 400 pounds.

Originally Posted by thawk408
Is the Honda NSX lighter then the Acura NSX. The Acura weighs 3150 and the Honda NSX-R is 2800. If the Honda NSX is lighter then the Acura, then it will be less then a 400 pound difference.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #47  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by ZlleH
LOL, sorry, it's 350 pounds lighter, not 400 pounds.
I was not trying to correct you . I was trying to compare the weight of the Honda NSX and the Honda NSX-R, instead of the Acura NSX and the Honda NSX-R. I just wanted to know if the Honda is lighter then the Acura.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 12:21 PM
  #48  
jakesford's Avatar
jakesford
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

pretty damn cool
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 12:25 PM
  #49  
35oZephyR's Avatar
35oZephyR
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,617
Likes: 1
From: san diego
Default

Honda NSX is still a Honda NSX in Japan....no Acura.

As far as the difference between the NSX and NSX-R the weight difference is a BIG part but there are other things that make the R perform alot better.

-bigger tires, brakes
-Final gear ratio is lower
-gas pedal response, torque is more linear for precision control.
-beefier stabilizer bars, struts, springs
-stiffer all around
-And of course, the bucket seats harness the driver's ****.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 12:46 PM
  #50  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by 35oZephyR
Honda NSX is still a Honda NSX in Japan....no Acura.

As far as the difference between the NSX and NSX-R the weight difference is a BIG part but there are other things that make the R perform alot better.

-bigger tires, brakes
-Final gear ratio is lower
-gas pedal response, torque is more linear for precision control.
-beefier stabilizer bars, struts, springs
-stiffer all around
-And of course, the bucket seats harness the driver's ****.
I know that it is only Honda over there. Acura is only present in the USA and Canada. I think the Acura NSX might be a tad bit heavier then the Honda NSX, just due to the more strict safety requirements.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #51  
Mr_Q's Avatar
Mr_Q
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Sherman Oaks, CA.
Default

Originally Posted by fahrenheit350
Can someone confirm this as the Nürburgring layout? If this is correct, it's one hell of a course, some of those bends must be crazy to go through.
I've only driven it in computer sim racing and even there it's frickin hairy. It gets better once you memorize it. I hope one day to get over there and try it for real.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 03:15 PM
  #52  
Yellow Stealth's Avatar
Yellow Stealth
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 513
Likes: 3
From: San Francisco
Default

Well, if you want to read about someone's experience in a 350Z from Grand Turismo 4 to the real thing, there is a cool article I just found here:

http://www.drive.com.au/editorial/ar...?id=10209&vf=1
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 09:01 AM
  #53  
CDR_UK's Avatar
CDR_UK
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Switzerland
Default

Here's some pictures of me at the ring, btw - appart from the general layout, the game cannot begin to let you experience what is like in terms of gradients, g-force, bumps, traffic (cars, bikes, buses, police), accidents (the people who are over confident) etc.



Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 09:12 AM
  #54  
350zQ45a's Avatar
350zQ45a
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Default

Hurly in an X5 with a V12, that must have been a wild ride.

So I am supposed to believe a stock 350z will beat a GTR around the 'ring? Some of these times are highly questionable.. as in maybe some drivers wern't so great?

In every comparison I've ever seen where they had S2ks go around a road course vs the Z, the S2k had no problem owning it. In fact even against the RX8 in the comparison I remember the road course times were nearly identical.

As a Z owner, these numbers are very surprising. I don't think a Z will outhandle out accelerate out anything against an NSX.

Considering a TYPE R NSX will run high 12s bone stock and has an incredible suspension.. basically the way the car should have been sold here.

Oh well, numbers are numbers.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 09:43 AM
  #55  
roast's Avatar
roast
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,092
Likes: 1
From: Okay, see?
Default

In every comparison I've ever seen where they had S2ks go around a road course vs the Z, the S2k had no problem owning it. In fact even against the RX8 in the comparison I remember the road course times were nearly identical.
Where do people get off saying this crap?
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 10:38 AM
  #56  
Firehawk's Avatar
Firehawk
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
Default

The Nordschleife (north loop) is a great track, much different than GT4, or any game I have played. Here are few pics that my friend and I took from the passenger seat of the rental we thrashed on the track (bmw 528)
Attached Thumbnails Z lap times at Nurburing-file0511.jpg   Z lap times at Nurburing-file0512.jpg   Z lap times at Nurburing-file0515.jpg   Z lap times at Nurburing-file0514.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 11:38 AM
  #57  
ALong's Avatar
ALong
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by 350zQ45a
In every comparison I've ever seen where they had S2ks go around a road course vs the Z, the S2k had no problem owning it. In fact even against the RX8 in the comparison I remember the road course times were nearly identical.
I have never seen a test where the S2k was faster than a 350Z on track. And from personal experience, actually racing against S2k's in Touring 2, the 350 kills them, they are at least 2 seconds a lap slower if not more (depending upon track)
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 01:11 PM
  #58  
Built2shredZ's Avatar
Built2shredZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,235
Likes: 0
From: West Coast
Default

Originally Posted by mavtais
The NSX came with skinny bicycle tires. That's why it's so hard for it to perform well. As for the Z, this is why I refuse to "upgrade" my suspension. I really don't think that those aftermarket spring mfgrs really know what effect stiffer and little bit lower will do to a Z. The 'Ring is full of bumps and other types of uneven surfaces, so one of the keys to running fast lap times is to have suspension that really works. On smooth pavement, the stiffer the better, but that only means you're making your tires work harder because your suspension isn't doing anything for handling.
Thats why you stick with a balance setup like the Nismo Kit.... Everything is matched..
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 01:19 PM
  #59  
Built2shredZ's Avatar
Built2shredZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,235
Likes: 0
From: West Coast
Default

Originally Posted by ALong
I have never seen a test where the S2k was faster than a 350Z on track. And from personal experience, actually racing against S2k's in Touring 2, the 350 kills them, they are at least 2 seconds a lap slower if not more (depending upon track)
I know magazines like Road & Track and Car & Driver have shown the S2000 faster at the track then the 350z (track comparisons where they get like 8 cars and run them at the track on the same day)...

Also the 350z thats running this track might be setup with Nismo equipment which might explain why it got the times that it did <shrug>
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 05:15 PM
  #60  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by 350zQ45a
Hurly in an X5 with a V12, that must have been a wild ride.

So I am supposed to believe a stock 350z will beat a GTR around the 'ring? Some of these times are highly questionable.. as in maybe some drivers wern't so great?

In every comparison I've ever seen where they had S2ks go around a road course vs the Z, the S2k had no problem owning it. In fact even against the RX8 in the comparison I remember the road course times were nearly identical.

As a Z owner, these numbers are very surprising. I don't think a Z will outhandle out accelerate out anything against an NSX.

Considering a TYPE R NSX will run high 12s bone stock and has an incredible suspension.. basically the way the car should have been sold here.

Oh well, numbers are numbers.
1/4 miles time are worth nothing on a big race track like the NurburgRing. By the time you get to the first curve, your way up in fourth gear. You might get down in third in some curves...

Momentum will get you around fast. We were passing 911s and older Ferraris with a rental BMW 320i. Knowledge of the track does help.

Trainning on a video game is a must for anyone who want's to enjoy his first day at that track (as opposed to be scared all the time).
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:21 AM.