300Hp
Originally Posted by ZeetheBest
The 06 Base model is the only one without the 300, it has like, 270ish or something.
The 300hps have 260ft/lbs.
As for the mods to get it 300, I dont have a clue.
The 300hps have 260ft/lbs.
As for the mods to get it 300, I dont have a clue.
Increase in hp is via:
1) changes to the camshaft profiles
2) adoption of stronger valve springs
3) variable exhaust-valve timing
4) installation of upgraded pistons, rods, and crank pulley
[ see: http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=9269 ]
p.s. isn't this an old topic?
1) changes to the camshaft profiles
2) adoption of stronger valve springs
3) variable exhaust-valve timing
4) installation of upgraded pistons, rods, and crank pulley
[ see: http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=9269 ]
p.s. isn't this an old topic?
Peak numbers mean poop. Area under the power curve is all that matters.
Last edited by roast; Apr 28, 2006 at 06:32 PM.
that car and driver article rated the 06 300HP Z as 5.8 0-60 and 14.3 quater mile....whats up with that?..slower times than the 287hp
Last edited by ericbel88; Apr 29, 2006 at 12:24 AM.
The 287hp models have a lot less weight, so just because the '06's have 13 more hp doesn't mean they accelerate faster, or even as fast. Read my above post. Not to mention the heavier the car is, the harder it is to get off the line.
Don't take magazine racing seriously, either.
Don't take magazine racing seriously, either.
Originally Posted by ericbel88
that car and driver article rated the 06 300HP Z as 5.8 0-60 and 14.3 quater mile....whats up with that?..slower times than the 287hp
Track conditions came into play as well as engine differences. C&D tested that car after it was raining. Poor grip.
In reality, the test numbers are essentially the same between the 2 engine types.
Originally Posted by zpak
Track conditions came into play as well as engine differences. C&D tested that car after it was raining. Poor grip.
In reality, the test numbers are essentially the same between the 2 engine types.
In reality, the test numbers are essentially the same between the 2 engine types.
Originally Posted by CaliforniaZman
All I gotta say is my 06 base is stupid quick for a stock ride that is gonna get mods here pretty soon...
Originally Posted by ericbel88
I see, cool cool....so what was the point of nissan gaining HP and losing TQ. if its virtually the same times?
There are some who say that the increased redline limit (7000 rpm) allows you to more fully take advantage of the engine's potential and that it does in fact respond better to modifications.
Lastly, if you want the 13hp bump without the weight increase, you can always go for an '05 Track or a 35th A.E. I did read somewhere, however, that the new weights were over-estimated, and that when the '06's were weighed, they weren't that much different than the '03-'05's.
Originally Posted by Kolia
The 300hp engine has more torque between 4,500 and 7,000rpm than the 287hp engine.
So even if peak torque is less, over all it has more torque.
So even if peak torque is less, over all it has more torque.
I'll keep saying it, there were even the 2 dynos on nissan.co.jp website, the 300hp engine produces more torque at more than 6000rpm(close to 6200rpm), bellow that rpm the 287hp engine produce more torque AND hp.
change cam profile and intake on the 287hp engine and it will be within 99% of the 300hp engine(you can have intake cam give exact same lift and duration as the vvted cam). Personally I think it's not worth the money for the mods. The fact 300hp engine do the MREV mod, sacrificing high end power for mid range says a lot...
Last edited by Nano; Apr 30, 2006 at 09:15 AM.
Originally Posted by Nano
you are saying the 300hp has more torque above 4500 rpms, yet the peak torque at 4800 is lower? if 287hp engine peak torque is higher at 4800 it probably is higher before 4800rpm, and also well after 4800rpm.
I'll keep saying it, there were even the 2 dynos on nissan.co.jp website, the 300hp engine produces more torque at more than 6000rpm(close to 6200rpm), bellow that rpm the 287hp engine produce more torque AND hp.
change cam profile and intake on the 287hp engine and it will be within 99% of the 300hp engine(you can have intake cam give exact same lift and duration as the vvted cam). Personally I think it's not worth the money for the mods. The fact 300hp engine do the MREV mod, sacrificing high end power for mid range says a lot...
I'll keep saying it, there were even the 2 dynos on nissan.co.jp website, the 300hp engine produces more torque at more than 6000rpm(close to 6200rpm), bellow that rpm the 287hp engine produce more torque AND hp.
change cam profile and intake on the 287hp engine and it will be within 99% of the 300hp engine(you can have intake cam give exact same lift and duration as the vvted cam). Personally I think it's not worth the money for the mods. The fact 300hp engine do the MREV mod, sacrificing high end power for mid range says a lot...
Just plug the numbers in the power equation...
Ah, and its not because "people do it" that a mod is valid. It's just ignorance for the most part, and plassebo effect from the engine feel and sound.
I find it interresting that lots of people say that the 300hp engine is not that good 'cuz you can mod the 287hp and make the same power for a couple of thousand dollards...


