Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

350Z vs. RX8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2006 | 10:21 PM
  #1  
CNT350Z's Avatar
CNT350Z
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Decatur Alabama
Default 350Z vs. RX8

Finally, after one year of owning two different Z's, I finally found someone willing to race me in their RX8. I have the basic beginner mods (listed below)as well as the RX8 did but I gotta tell ya, those cars are slow! I spanked him at three straight red lights. I only went to 3rd gear each time but each time he was at least 3 car lengths or more behind me. Victory is such a sweet feeling! I'm sure this race has been posted but I had to share.
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 10:25 PM
  #2  
Reyes_USN's Avatar
Reyes_USN
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 0
From: Azusa, CA
Default

eh screw the lights, give him a run at the mountains he's lighter and should make it more interesting
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 10:27 PM
  #3  
CNT350Z's Avatar
CNT350Z
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Decatur Alabama
Default

I agree but the icing on the cake was that he asked permission to get in front of me to turn right at the next street!
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 10:59 PM
  #4  
Z4Zoro's Avatar
Z4Zoro
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Seaside, CA
Default

Was his car manual or auto? There is a difference in power between the two transmissions. If it is auto 197, manual 238. Hopefully it was not an auto, lol.
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 11:35 PM
  #5  
Cannysage's Avatar
Cannysage
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,374
Likes: 1
From: SO_CAL
Default

I give the rx8 props for even running.
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 11:52 PM
  #6  
roast's Avatar
roast
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,092
Likes: 1
From: Okay, see?
Default

Originally Posted by Cannysage
I give the rx8 props for even running.
+1

The only rx8 that ever even thought about racing me, did just that... he thought about it. I was cruising on the highway and passed him. He had a full body kit, wing.... etc. He sped up very obviously to pull even with me and started pacing me. I thought he must want to play so I downshifted and goosed it hard to see if he was game. He let off the throttle completely and tried to get as far away as possible.

It was classic.

rx8 = teh slow.
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 12:07 AM
  #7  
gsazabi's Avatar
gsazabi
Registered User
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,906
Likes: 1
From: 818 So.Cal
Default

I've driven RX-8 before. It's SLOW.
They should discontinue the car ASAP and
bring back the real RX = the RX-7
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 12:14 AM
  #8  
Z4Zoro's Avatar
Z4Zoro
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Seaside, CA
Default

Originally Posted by gsazabi
I've driven RX-8 before. It's SLOW.
They should discontinue the car ASAP and
bring back the real RX = the RX-7
I thought it was decent. The manual of course. Alot of high reving to get the car moving, but its a fun car.
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 12:16 AM
  #9  
gsazabi's Avatar
gsazabi
Registered User
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,906
Likes: 1
From: 818 So.Cal
Default

Originally Posted by Z4Zoro
I thought it was decent. The manual of course. Alot of high reving to get the car moving, but its a fun car.
For me the lack of low end torque was a bit letdown.
Talking about high reving engine, now S2000 was FUN to drive compared to RX-8.
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 12:21 AM
  #10  
sokudo9l6's Avatar
sokudo9l6
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Default

i test drove the rx8 before getting the Z. That car is fun for taking turns but it lacked power. That was the main reason why i didn't get one. But on the other hand...if it had as much power as the Z then that would have been the more practical choice.
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 01:01 AM
  #11  
Mazinger Z's Avatar
Mazinger Z
New Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,712
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
Default

If they make the Rx-8 with a turbo and pushing 300hp, i would dig that car for sure
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 01:02 AM
  #12  
Tenac1ousZ's Avatar
Tenac1ousZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
From: Sunny, smoggy California
Default

But they have a sporty-sounding exhaust though -- at least when reved up. I wonder how much HP if those things are turbo charged.
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 01:08 AM
  #13  
Nitrouz's Avatar
Nitrouz
Back to Z
Premier Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,626
Likes: 2
From: West Coast
Default

Originally Posted by Tenac1ousZ
But they have a sporty-sounding exhaust though -- at least when reved up. I wonder how much HP if those things are turbo charged.
I remember reading an article about an RX8 with a Greddy TT kit pushing hp in the high 200 range...I could be wrong, but that's ridiculously slow for an aftermarket TT'ed modern "sports" car.
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 01:13 AM
  #14  
gsazabi's Avatar
gsazabi
Registered User
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,906
Likes: 1
From: 818 So.Cal
Default

Originally Posted by Tenac1ousZ
But they have a sporty-sounding exhaust though -- at least when reved up. I wonder how much HP if those things are turbo charged.
With Greddy bolt-on turbo they are about 260whp. WEAK.
There was a comparison article on R&T Speed which featured
Greddy turbo RX-8 with full bolt-on mods it still pulled only upper 200s or low 300s (I 4got gotta check again)
Still WEAK.
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 03:19 AM
  #15  
r26's Avatar
r26
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Default

i don't think the looks of the rx8 could ever win me over. the back is ok, but the front is lame
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 03:22 AM
  #16  
Tenac1ousZ's Avatar
Tenac1ousZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
From: Sunny, smoggy California
Default

That's really low hp. I guess it's not bad for the engine size, but still bad for a sports car. Why would mazda use that rotary, when their turbo engine from the mazda speed 6 have better potential and probably more reliable. It has something like 280 lbs of torque stock.

Last edited by Tenac1ousZ; May 27, 2006 at 03:30 AM.
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 03:24 AM
  #17  
Mellowman's Avatar
Mellowman
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Hills, OC, CA
Default

+1 for a turbo
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 03:39 AM
  #18  
sq40's Avatar
sq40
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,587
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

I was in a Mazda dealership the other day and they had a ****aka Edition RX-8 with a body kit that looked really good, the interior had nice leather too.. But they wanted $34K for the damn thing!!! As a 20-25K sporty car it would be great, but as a 30-35K car it is totally ou-classes. The RX-8 should be classed with the Eclipse or Civic SI.
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 06:02 AM
  #19  
Act of God's Avatar
Act of God
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

what word did the board censor there?
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 06:04 AM
  #20  
lane myers's Avatar
lane myers
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: the kid from greendale
Default

in before the move!


yes the 8's are slow.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:07 AM.