350Z vs. Cayman S
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by lilaznxboi08
i think the regular cayman may be able to take the Z. it only has 245hp, but is about 550lbs lighter.
not the tiptronic. i drove one and was sluggish felt like the IS300 i used to have. as for the manual porsche quotes 5.8 0-60 and 6.7 for the tiptronic like i drove.
the cayman S on the other hand felt great. its more like 5 sec even 0-60 ive actually got a dealer trying to find me one with about 5K miles on it and i might trade the C6 for it. but we'll see. all i know is i love that car
Last edited by **; 09-02-2006 at 12:38 AM.
#25
the cayman outhandles the Z33 by a pretty big margin.....slalom numbers and skidpad dont necessarily tell how well a car handles...they're just numbers for reference.
(for example, an s2k outhandles the Evo (look at stock SCCA class rankings), but the Evo has higher slalom speed and skidpad numbers on paper...)
cayman is faster too in the straightline. better interior, higher class....
but that's what u get for paying much more for the z33...
(for example, an s2k outhandles the Evo (look at stock SCCA class rankings), but the Evo has higher slalom speed and skidpad numbers on paper...)
cayman is faster too in the straightline. better interior, higher class....
but that's what u get for paying much more for the z33...
#26
Originally Posted by bofa
Yeah, I've read about that a lot on here in searching older posts and the tire shredding issue seems to have been fixed with the 05 year I believe. I have an 06 and no problems from the tires so far. Some of you guys with the older models, correct me if I'm wrong.
#27
Originally Posted by lilaznxboi08
i think the regular cayman may be able to take the Z. it only has 245hp, but is about 550lbs lighter.
03 base has a 3188 lb curb weight - 123 weight reduction = 3065 lbs
The cayman weighs in 2866 lbs and has a drag coeff. of 0.29 also.
http://www.carfolio.com/specificatio...mobile-Porsche
#32
Porsche vs 350z
I have been told that Porsche is very reliable long term. This may not be true. But I would certainly choose one over a Chevy for reliability. The Interlagos Fire color of the Z is just SWEET! I will hopefully testdrive both this weekend side by side. If I choose the Z I will definitely wait for the 07.
#33
Have you thought about the new BMW 335i coupe??
very sexy, 300 hp twin turbo 6, 0-60 under 5 sec.
smoother ride/ luxury, 155 top speed, 6M LESS $ than caymen S (about 42k)
only litttle more than loaded Z, maintenence included, runflats,
a zillion other options
Check it out, think its my NEXT car (if not, the skyline GTR)
very sexy, 300 hp twin turbo 6, 0-60 under 5 sec.
smoother ride/ luxury, 155 top speed, 6M LESS $ than caymen S (about 42k)
only litttle more than loaded Z, maintenence included, runflats,
a zillion other options
Check it out, think its my NEXT car (if not, the skyline GTR)
#34
Originally Posted by banhbao
Ppl usually dont cross shopping between Cayman and 350z due to huge price different. If you want value, go with 350z. If money is no matter, go with Cayman S. I'm considering a boxster myself after hearing so many issue with the 350z. 350Z is still a great car for the $ though.
I think Porsche make a great everyday sports car just know that the intial price is only half of the extra expense of owning the car. Services are expensive and kiss resale good buy if its not a Porsche dealer do it. If I was spending Cayman money I'd want it to be strictly a toy and get something like a 993 Turbo, used C2S or used GT3.
#35
if money is no issue, you shouldnt even have to ask this question!
Handling would own the Z. RWD and mid engine...come on now. Like someone else mentioned the porsche is in a totally different league now. Former boxster might be a different story.
Handling would own the Z. RWD and mid engine...come on now. Like someone else mentioned the porsche is in a totally different league now. Former boxster might be a different story.
#36
Porsche vs 350z
I Test drove the BMW 3 series sedan (the coupe was not out yet). I could not understand what all the fuss was about. Cheap looking fake wood, harsh, punishing ride, brakes that were so sensitive that you almost throw yourself through the windshield when you touch them. Am I missing something? Exactly what is so special about BMW? Not to mention horrible long term reliability and one of the worse initial quality ratings. Talk about paying for a name! The only other car that I have considered is the G35 coupe but I guess the new one isn't coming out till next fall.
#38
If you have the ability to get a Cayman S, it should be no contest. Yes, for the price, you could take the Z and beef it up so that it has way more power and nearly as good grip, but there are very few Cayman S on the road--the rarity factor is a big plus for the Cayman. I see 20-30 Zs every day on the road. The Z is turning into the Acura Integra, imo. That's great for Nissan, as they have a really successful car, but as an end user, I hate seeing everyone else with the same darned car. You won't have that with the Cayman, at least for the first 3-4 years.
#39
You drove your Nissan for 16 years. You'll never be able to do that w/ the Porsche w/out major overhauls and mucho dinero in service fees. If I were you I'd go w/ the M3. It has performance, style, class and the name recognition for your clients. If not you could get the G35 coupe, but you'd lose on performance. It does have a nice luxurious-sporty feel though and more room than the Z or Cayman.
#40
Originally Posted by premiumphoto
I Test drove the BMW 3 series sedan (the coupe was not out yet). I could not understand what all the fuss was about. Cheap looking fake wood, harsh, punishing ride, brakes that were so sensitive that you almost throw yourself through the windshield when you touch them. Am I missing something? Exactly what is so special about BMW? Not to mention horrible long term reliability and one of the worse initial quality ratings. Talk about paying for a name! The only other car that I have considered is the G35 coupe but I guess the new one isn't coming out till next fall.