Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Why couldn't my Z beat an M3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2007 | 06:49 PM
  #121  
Laughitup85's Avatar
Laughitup85
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville
Default

I just beat an M3 today lol
Old 08-14-2007 | 07:05 PM
  #122  
jinsei888's Avatar
jinsei888
New Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,262
Likes: 2
From: South San Francisco, CA
Default

Originally Posted by BlackZero6
..........hit it hit it hit it.....quit it
LMFHO!!!
Old 08-14-2007 | 07:06 PM
  #123  
Bumpinjeep's Avatar
Bumpinjeep
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,743
Likes: 25
From: Bellevue Wa
Default

Havnt seen this thread it ages.
Old 08-14-2007 | 07:30 PM
  #124  
fr0ng's Avatar
fr0ng
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Grey Ghost
the M3 on there was an E36 not an E46
it was an e46
Old 08-14-2007 | 07:34 PM
  #125  
lilaznxboi08's Avatar
lilaznxboi08
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: so cal
Default

because we can't beat M3s. they have 40 more hp than us. bmers also gain hp easily through mods like ecu.
Old 08-14-2007 | 09:22 PM
  #126  
HDPDZO6's Avatar
HDPDZO6
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Bam-0
but you put money in it it will beat any car around its price range or more
Okay, this portion of your comment is nothing more than pure rice.
Old 08-14-2007 | 11:29 PM
  #127  
Espirit's Avatar
Espirit
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Okinawa, Japan
Default

Originally Posted by GalvatronType_R
Folks, there is this secretary at work (don't bother asking, she's beautiful but married and I don't go after married women) who drives an E46 M3 and we go back and forth about who would win in a race (especially after teasing her about driving a yuppie car).

I know races aren't won on paper, but on paper, it seems like my Z would keep up with her. Granted she has more horses (333) but it takes a while to get there (7900 RPMs). My Z has more torque (274 vs. 262) and weighs about 200 lbs. less (offset by about 50 lbs. because I weigh 175 and she weighs probably about 120).

So I ask again, if we went to a half mile track, why couldn't my Z keep up with her M3?
Do you really have spinners? Prlobly not. M3 is a faster car, it runs 13.1 at 105. I know it has been achieved by one of our members with his 07, but you gotta keep in mind that the best times have been achieved on that track
Old 08-14-2007 | 11:33 PM
  #128  
Espirit's Avatar
Espirit
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Okinawa, Japan
Default

Originally Posted by fr0ng
straight line racing is SO LAME. HAY GUYS I CAN SMASH MY FOOT ON THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL AND GO STRAIGHT!!11one

GO ON A FREAKING TRACK AND USE THE CARS CORNERING ABILITY, BRAKING ABILITY, ACCELRETATION, DRIVER SKILL, AND OTHER THINGS THAT YOU DONT GET TO USE IN A STRAIGHT LINE RACE.
Each to their own. Plus you really expect that chick to track her car?
Old 08-15-2007 | 12:07 AM
  #129  
KG350Z's Avatar
KG350Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: austin, texas
Default

I don't think she had a six speed! The SMGs are fast dude, really fast. Well at least my SMG M3 was faster than my dad's six speed version.
Old 08-28-2007 | 08:33 PM
  #130  
ZRaven's Avatar
ZRaven
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: NOVA
Default

Originally Posted by lilaznxboi08
because we can't beat M3s. they have 40 more hp than us. bmers also gain hp easily through mods like ecu.
ummm, no. e46 M3's are lucky to gain 10-15 hp with a ecu flash.
As for cost of ownership, here are some examples:
  • Oil Changes every 6k miles (diy): ~$90 (10-60 castrol is $10/quart, need 8)
  • Brake Job (diy): ~$760 (brake fluid, sensors, pads & rotors from stoptech, ss lines)
  • Valve adjustment every 666 gallons of gas: $600 (indie mechanic) $1200 dealer
  • Alternator (diy): $300 parts

As for performance parts M3's get the BMW tax everywhere. Just tell whomever you're getting a price quote you're buying mods for a BMW and they graciously tack on 15-20% on the price

Mod prices, I guess, aren't too bad except when you go FI:

Volk C28N's: $3100 retail
Coilovers Tein: $1600
Exhaust/muffler: ~$1k lowend - $1.8k ti pipes
Midpipes: ~$1k (2 sections)
Headers: $1.1k
Intake: $300-500, although changing the filter to KN ~$40, produces about the same results.
Supercharger: $12000 ~500whp
HPF Turbocharger: $16000 ~672whp race gas

There is one guy who spent a boat load of money on his M3 to get ~900whp single turbo. Unfortunately, he couldn't put the power to ground efficiently so his 1/4 mile times weren't that great, good, but not in the 10's. Prolly had to do with using 19" street tire setup.
Old 08-28-2007 | 09:24 PM
  #131  
TimeAttkZ's Avatar
TimeAttkZ
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: OC
Default

Originally Posted by SaadSindhu
I have raced my cousins 6spd e46 on a number of occasions, and it seems he has the kick from the start if we go at it from a dig but from a rolling start in 3rd we stay pretty much neck n neck through 4th and 5th...

Screww the race! Think of the money you saved when buying a car which is better than the m3 from ALL angles. M3's are hard to work on and a waste of money cuz the potential just isnt there..

When all is said and done, your Z is a sexy *** car and the m3 is pretty bogous. I pity those who waste their time n money on m3's.

Wow that was the most uneducated information Ive heard in a while. I own a 350z as well but Im not going to be blinded by my own pride. The facts are the M3 is a better car inside and out. The s54 has won engine of the year 5 times for a dam reason. The Z may be better looking in your opinion and I cannot argue your opinion. But don't go and bash the M3 with no prior knowledge of the car. " Potentially the m3 just isnt there "... hahah wtf, how do you figure ??? The M series cars have been the most celebrated/decorated race cars in history.
Old 08-29-2007 | 12:13 AM
  #132  
Anthony C's Avatar
Anthony C
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

wow this is ironic...
i actually ran my buddies 04 or 05 e46 m3 tonight just for ****s and giggles


(only to like 70mph) im not a fan of racing on the street

but yea... z's suck lol... they look good and handle decent and sound nice... but godamn are they slow...

given all i have done is a jwt pop charger, (went back to stock exhaust after gettin rear ended due to some drunk ***$hole) but still lol... i kinda wish i woulda traded my 04 wrx for an 04 sti at times than for my z roadster...

o well i still love my car but damn shes a pig... she needs a diet haha
Old 08-29-2007 | 12:58 AM
  #133  
ZROCKET's Avatar
ZROCKET
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Sin City
Default

A couple of months ago at the drags there was this M3. Asian dude and his hot asian GF. CA plates he was only running mid 15's. I was running Low 14's in my rustang. Vegas is about 1 1/10 slower than sea level.
Old 08-29-2007 | 06:30 AM
  #134  
gjoey66's Avatar
gjoey66
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Default

My friend and I bought new Z and M3 at the same time...we kept going back and forth for months then we finally raced...(abandoned runway)...i beat him off the line and pulled through second then he started catching up but wasn't able to pass till over 100 mph ish...

then we switch cars and I just plain smoked him...at first i though he's just letting me win so his car looks good...then we started timing our runs with both of us in the car...plain and simple that M3 launches great and has better tires to boot...the shifts are so much smoother that you can stomp on the gas and have very little slipage...(might be tires) but in the end mine felt faster and torque'y...but his consistently beat my times...
Old 08-29-2007 | 07:25 AM
  #135  
KingOfV6's Avatar
KingOfV6
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

I don't get it 0-60 for the z is 5.3, 5.2 at best, The M3 SMG 2 is 4.7 0-60! the 6 speed smg2 with a normal driver would prolly get around 5, and the convert smg is about the same since u know those are slower. We took a friends 04 smg m3 convertible and put it to the test, there is not way the top end of the Z could come close to a M3 even the convert, and as well from a stop, if the SMG2 m3 is in launch mode, it will make an evo look like its trying to hard, here is a clip of launch mode, its really amazing technology, u have to set it up with the push of a a few buttons and whatnot, impressive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NofqEZz6Q8s
Old 08-29-2007 | 07:32 AM
  #136  
Nism0_RoLLa's Avatar
Nism0_RoLLa
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by GalvatronType_R
Folks, there is this secretary at work (don't bother asking, she's beautiful but married and I don't go after married women) who drives an E46 M3 and we go back and forth about who would win in a race (especially after teasing her about driving a yuppie car).

I know races aren't won on paper, but on paper, it seems like my Z would keep up with her. Granted she has more horses (333) but it takes a while to get there (7900 RPMs). My Z has more torque (274 vs. 262) and weighs about 200 lbs. less (offset by about 50 lbs. because I weigh 175 and she weighs probably about 120).

So I ask again, if we went to a half mile track, why couldn't my Z keep up with her M3?
I've rapped lots of M3's by like 2 to 3 cars with ma nismo Z. Not very hard to do.
Old 08-29-2007 | 07:53 AM
  #137  
BADASSTT's Avatar
BADASSTT
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
From: Plantation, Fla.
Default

So how would an M3 do against an 07 Z?
Old 08-29-2007 | 07:55 AM
  #138  
tran03's Avatar
tran03
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Wow this thread is old but here goes:

#1. Racing up to only 70mph will not show the power of most cars. A true highway pull should be rolling from whatever, say 30-45mph to 120mph. There is no need to be going into 5th gear, that's just crazy and proves to be pointless.

#2. I think a 287HP 350z would lose to the 333HP M3 simply due to the trap speed. Check out this website, http://www.autofacts.ca/classics/fast.htm . According to that website, a 2002 M3 traps 106mph in the 1/4 while the fastest 297HP 350z on there only traps 103mph, which is VERY hard to do in a stock Z. The best I've EVER gotten, trap wise, has been 99.7mph. Granted I'm at a crappy drag strip and elevation but I think the best any board member has gone has been 102mph. Regardless, even the new 2007 350z 306HP cannot keep up with the 333HP M3.

Sure you can beat them when they don't know how to drive, shift, etc.

HP for HP and proven trap speed versus trap speed, 350z loses to the M3.

Tony
Old 08-29-2007 | 07:57 AM
  #139  
Divergent13's Avatar
Divergent13
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
From: Northwest
Default

You guys are comparing a 2+2 seater luxury GT car to a sports car?
Old 08-29-2007 | 08:39 AM
  #140  
dcmaxclub's Avatar
dcmaxclub
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
From: dc/md
Default

Originally Posted by tran03
Wow this thread is old but here goes:

#1. Racing up to only 70mph will not show the power of most cars. A true highway pull should be rolling from whatever, say 30-45mph to 120mph. There is no need to be going into 5th gear, that's just crazy and proves to be pointless.

#2. I think a 287HP 350z would lose to the 333HP M3 simply due to the trap speed. Check out this website, http://www.autofacts.ca/classics/fast.htm . According to that website, a 2002 M3 traps 106mph in the 1/4 while the fastest 297HP 350z on there only traps 103mph, which is VERY hard to do in a stock Z. The best I've EVER gotten, trap wise, has been 99.7mph. Granted I'm at a crappy drag strip and elevation but I think the best any board member has gone has been 102mph. Regardless, even the new 2007 350z 306HP cannot keep up with the 333HP M3.

Sure you can beat them when they don't know how to drive, shift, etc.
1.) you're right, except that 287hp board members (at least myself) have been at 103 stock.

2.)


Quick Reply: Why couldn't my Z beat an M3



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:19 PM.