Why does everyone talk **** bout the 350Z?
02-14-2007 | 11:15 AM
#387
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: naperville, il
this thread is rediculous. who knows how to spell and use grammar? is the rsx type s a 14,15,or 16 second car. the rsx has better potential blah blah blah.
see here's a few observations i've had here:
1. even if an rsx can run a 14.9 quarter stock, a z can run a high 13 or low 14 quarter stock. 350z:1 rsx:0
2. rsx's respond better to mods than a 350z if the z stays N/A. true but the rsx has to make up a lot of ground to even equal the z's performance. a full bolt on z will run low 13's, and unless there's some pretty radical cams and a a really aggressive tune, the rsx cannot: 350z:2 rsx:0
*i know some will ***** about this one but if you have a 300hp car that gains only a little from mods and a 200hp car that gains a lot from mods, it still has to gain 100hp before it can equal the numbers of the other car stock so that's y the z wins. the z's lack of N/A improvements arent great enough to make it loose to an rsx with the same mods.
3. 350z's dont have a potential for speed. this would almost be true if it werent faster than an s2000 (which is a faster honda than an rsx), faster than a boxter, and tied with an m3 around a racetrack....STOCK. there's probably never been an rsx in a competition like that with a z because as many have said, the z is in a differant class. 350z:3 rsx:0
4. lets look at platforms. the 350z is a front engine rear wheel drive car. the rsx is a front engine front wheel drive car. i learned that front wheel drive sux back when i was riding a tricycle but apparently some havnt. for drag racing fwd is worse due to weight transfering to the back when accelerating. when road racing front wheel drive tends to understeer and hop it's way through corners. and also what configuration is generally an ideal setup for a true sports car? that would be front engine rear wheel drive with close to 50/50 weight distribution. 350z:4 rsx:0
5. weight: the rsx is ligher than the z
350z:4 rsx:1 (good work guys)
6. the 0-60, quarter, braking, skidpad, and top speed of the z is better than the rsx. 350z:5 rsx:1
there you have it you ricer rsx driving homos, who cares if your bolt on rsx can beat a stock z, throw the same mods on a z and you'll get your *** handed to you at the strip or a track. that's like saying my twin turbo z can beat a stock ferrari f430. who really cares? which is a better car
closing comments:
that 15 year old 05 rsx dude needs to have his nap time. has he ever even driven a car? i thin in the next few years (once he actually gets his liscense) he'll learn to stop being a retard. i know when iw as 15 i wanted a civic with a big wing and a body kit, but i realized that my childish 15 year old fantasies were retarded and maybe he'll learn that he's an idiot.
the 350-in-the-z or whatever his name is guys needs to gtf out of here. he openly admitted he's here to try and annoy people.
oh and last thing for the rsx guys, there's 2 people on here who have owned both cars and while they said they loved their rsx's, they also said the z is better so there's probably the most valid opinions right there.
see here's a few observations i've had here:
1. even if an rsx can run a 14.9 quarter stock, a z can run a high 13 or low 14 quarter stock. 350z:1 rsx:0
2. rsx's respond better to mods than a 350z if the z stays N/A. true but the rsx has to make up a lot of ground to even equal the z's performance. a full bolt on z will run low 13's, and unless there's some pretty radical cams and a a really aggressive tune, the rsx cannot: 350z:2 rsx:0
*i know some will ***** about this one but if you have a 300hp car that gains only a little from mods and a 200hp car that gains a lot from mods, it still has to gain 100hp before it can equal the numbers of the other car stock so that's y the z wins. the z's lack of N/A improvements arent great enough to make it loose to an rsx with the same mods.
3. 350z's dont have a potential for speed. this would almost be true if it werent faster than an s2000 (which is a faster honda than an rsx), faster than a boxter, and tied with an m3 around a racetrack....STOCK. there's probably never been an rsx in a competition like that with a z because as many have said, the z is in a differant class. 350z:3 rsx:0
4. lets look at platforms. the 350z is a front engine rear wheel drive car. the rsx is a front engine front wheel drive car. i learned that front wheel drive sux back when i was riding a tricycle but apparently some havnt. for drag racing fwd is worse due to weight transfering to the back when accelerating. when road racing front wheel drive tends to understeer and hop it's way through corners. and also what configuration is generally an ideal setup for a true sports car? that would be front engine rear wheel drive with close to 50/50 weight distribution. 350z:4 rsx:0
5. weight: the rsx is ligher than the z
350z:4 rsx:1 (good work guys)
6. the 0-60, quarter, braking, skidpad, and top speed of the z is better than the rsx. 350z:5 rsx:1
there you have it you ricer rsx driving homos, who cares if your bolt on rsx can beat a stock z, throw the same mods on a z and you'll get your *** handed to you at the strip or a track. that's like saying my twin turbo z can beat a stock ferrari f430. who really cares? which is a better car
closing comments:
that 15 year old 05 rsx dude needs to have his nap time. has he ever even driven a car? i thin in the next few years (once he actually gets his liscense) he'll learn to stop being a retard. i know when iw as 15 i wanted a civic with a big wing and a body kit, but i realized that my childish 15 year old fantasies were retarded and maybe he'll learn that he's an idiot.
the 350-in-the-z or whatever his name is guys needs to gtf out of here. he openly admitted he's here to try and annoy people.
oh and last thing for the rsx guys, there's 2 people on here who have owned both cars and while they said they loved their rsx's, they also said the z is better so there's probably the most valid opinions right there.
02-14-2007 | 11:21 AM
#390
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: naperville, il
Originally Posted by 05Aucrarsx
rsx can never lose, interior always look better
02-14-2007 | 11:23 AM
#392
Originally Posted by FALLEN1z
it's funny that when some actual numbers for both cars are posted all you have to say is that the interior is better. you ricer ****s really need to stop watching fast and the furious and realize when you should just admit that your car isnt as good as someone elses....do you even have a car? how long till you hit the big one six?
02-14-2007 | 11:26 AM
#394
Banned
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: clubrsx
Originally Posted by camaro194
On crsx she has a van FWIW. I'm tired of listening to little 15 yr olds whine. Do as I did, add her to your ignore list. Eventually she'll get banned.
nice try for the neg rep, idiot
ahahahaha
02-14-2007 | 11:26 AM
#395
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: naperville, il
Originally Posted by 05Aucrarsx
did i ever say rsx is better than a Z? no
02-14-2007 | 11:27 AM
#397
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted by FALLEN1z
this thread is rediculous. who knows how to spell and use grammar? is the rsx type s a 14,15,or 16 second car. the rsx has better potential blah blah blah.
see here's a few observations i've had here:
1. even if an rsx can run a 14.9 quarter stock, a z can run a high 13 or low 14 quarter stock. 350z:1 rsx:0
2. rsx's respond better to mods than a 350z if the z stays N/A. true but the rsx has to make up a lot of ground to even equal the z's performance. a full bolt on z will run low 13's, and unless there's some pretty radical cams and a a really aggressive tune, the rsx cannot: 350z:2 rsx:0
*i know some will ***** about this one but if you have a 300hp car that gains only a little from mods and a 200hp car that gains a lot from mods, it still has to gain 100hp before it can equal the numbers of the other car stock so that's y the z wins. the z's lack of N/A improvements arent great enough to make it loose to an rsx with the same mods.
3. 350z's dont have a potential for speed. this would almost be true if it werent faster than an s2000 (which is a faster honda than an rsx), faster than a boxter, and tied with an m3 around a racetrack....STOCK. there's probably never been an rsx in a competition like that with a z because as many have said, the z is in a differant class. 350z:3 rsx:0
4. lets look at platforms. the 350z is a front engine rear wheel drive car. the rsx is a front engine front wheel drive car. i learned that front wheel drive sux back when i was riding a tricycle but apparently some havnt. for drag racing fwd is worse due to weight transfering to the back when accelerating. when road racing front wheel drive tends to understeer and hop it's way through corners. and also what configuration is generally an ideal setup for a true sports car? that would be front engine rear wheel drive with close to 50/50 weight distribution. 350z:4 rsx:0
5. weight: the rsx is ligher than the z
350z:4 rsx:1 (good work guys)
6. the 0-60, quarter, braking, skidpad, and top speed of the z is better than the rsx. 350z:5 rsx:1
there you have it you ricer rsx driving homos, who cares if your bolt on rsx can beat a stock z, throw the same mods on a z and you'll get your *** handed to you at the strip or a track. that's like saying my twin turbo z can beat a stock ferrari f430. who really cares? which is a better car
closing comments:
that 15 year old 05 rsx dude needs to have his nap time. has he ever even driven a car? i thin in the next few years (once he actually gets his liscense) he'll learn to stop being a retard. i know when iw as 15 i wanted a civic with a big wing and a body kit, but i realized that my childish 15 year old fantasies were retarded and maybe he'll learn that he's an idiot.
the 350-in-the-z or whatever his name is guys needs to gtf out of here. he openly admitted he's here to try and annoy people.
oh and last thing for the rsx guys, there's 2 people on here who have owned both cars and while they said they loved their rsx's, they also said the z is better so there's probably the most valid opinions right there.
see here's a few observations i've had here:
1. even if an rsx can run a 14.9 quarter stock, a z can run a high 13 or low 14 quarter stock. 350z:1 rsx:0
2. rsx's respond better to mods than a 350z if the z stays N/A. true but the rsx has to make up a lot of ground to even equal the z's performance. a full bolt on z will run low 13's, and unless there's some pretty radical cams and a a really aggressive tune, the rsx cannot: 350z:2 rsx:0
*i know some will ***** about this one but if you have a 300hp car that gains only a little from mods and a 200hp car that gains a lot from mods, it still has to gain 100hp before it can equal the numbers of the other car stock so that's y the z wins. the z's lack of N/A improvements arent great enough to make it loose to an rsx with the same mods.
3. 350z's dont have a potential for speed. this would almost be true if it werent faster than an s2000 (which is a faster honda than an rsx), faster than a boxter, and tied with an m3 around a racetrack....STOCK. there's probably never been an rsx in a competition like that with a z because as many have said, the z is in a differant class. 350z:3 rsx:0
4. lets look at platforms. the 350z is a front engine rear wheel drive car. the rsx is a front engine front wheel drive car. i learned that front wheel drive sux back when i was riding a tricycle but apparently some havnt. for drag racing fwd is worse due to weight transfering to the back when accelerating. when road racing front wheel drive tends to understeer and hop it's way through corners. and also what configuration is generally an ideal setup for a true sports car? that would be front engine rear wheel drive with close to 50/50 weight distribution. 350z:4 rsx:0
5. weight: the rsx is ligher than the z
350z:4 rsx:1 (good work guys)
6. the 0-60, quarter, braking, skidpad, and top speed of the z is better than the rsx. 350z:5 rsx:1
there you have it you ricer rsx driving homos, who cares if your bolt on rsx can beat a stock z, throw the same mods on a z and you'll get your *** handed to you at the strip or a track. that's like saying my twin turbo z can beat a stock ferrari f430. who really cares? which is a better car
closing comments:
that 15 year old 05 rsx dude needs to have his nap time. has he ever even driven a car? i thin in the next few years (once he actually gets his liscense) he'll learn to stop being a retard. i know when iw as 15 i wanted a civic with a big wing and a body kit, but i realized that my childish 15 year old fantasies were retarded and maybe he'll learn that he's an idiot.
the 350-in-the-z or whatever his name is guys needs to gtf out of here. he openly admitted he's here to try and annoy people.
oh and last thing for the rsx guys, there's 2 people on here who have owned both cars and while they said they loved their rsx's, they also said the z is better so there's probably the most valid opinions right there.
02-14-2007 | 11:27 AM
#398
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted by 05Aucrarsx
heard they are suppose to attack this place this fri nite at 10pm
