Why does everyone talk **** bout the 350Z?
02-14-2007 | 11:29 AM
#401
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: naperville, il
Originally Posted by angelboy52
BTW congrats on stooping to our level and having to resort to name calling, you should feel proud. :thumbsup:
02-14-2007 | 11:42 AM
#402
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: STL
Originally Posted by black06z
I actually never heard of anyone talking s*** about the Corvette. Every import lover Ive talked to says good things. 
02-14-2007 | 12:07 PM
#404
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted by FALLEN1z
it's frustrating because "you people"(not gonna name call) always seem to think that your car is faster or better even when there's ample proof that it's not. there's nothing for you to argue and somehow this thread is 20 pages long. if you like the rsx better due to personal preferance than fine, but dont try and argue it being faster or anything like that because it's just simple stupid to think that
02-14-2007 | 12:11 PM
#407
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Exactly, go ahead and ramble about your "300 hp V6", but we both know chicks aren't interested in how light your titanium true dual exhaust is, they only care about interior. Go ahead and say you'll smoke me, but at the end of the day, we know who the girl is gonna go with, the one with the better interior. :giggitygiggity:
I kinda like my interior 
02-14-2007 | 12:19 PM
#411
Lol whats wrong with the Z's interior? I had an 03 g35 before and I like it better. And girls like style. Not an econobox ricer vehicle. I'll admit I used to think about ricing cars out. Then I wisened up and REACHED THE LEGAL DRIVING AGE!
Hahaha.. We're arguing about interiors..
02-14-2007 | 12:40 PM
#414
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: naperville, il
i think girls are more likely to go for the guy in the z. not being biased, i just noticed that when i was in my dad's g35 i was always getting winks and smiles and waves, and in the z i get even more attention from them. my friend has an rsx and no girl ever gives it a second look. not trying to bash the rsx with that comment it's just a personal observation
02-14-2007 | 12:43 PM
#415
Originally Posted by angelboy52
lol Evo and STI interior FTL
Now I don't know about the STI/STi with their pink lettering and blue carpet...
02-14-2007 | 12:47 PM
#416
lol....this is hilarious. So since Z's own RSX's, they have to refer to the interior of they're cars?? ahahaha! Thats like putting some $5k wheels on a primered 89' Ford Tempo and saying "ya but look at my wheels".
02-14-2007 | 12:55 PM
#417
Z's arent the fastest out there, they arent the most expensive out there either. RSX isnt a bad car either. Sure its pretty quick and doesnt look too bad, I guess. But they cant even be compared!! Thats like comparing a Z to a Cobra or Saleen, AMG or something like that. Although a few Z's maybe faster, those cars are not on the same level. RSX's owners need to get that through their thick heads. Everyday I get some riced out Honda trying to rev its 5" fart can exhaust at me. He may be faster, who knows, point is that its still not on the same level man.
02-14-2007 | 12:58 PM
#418
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally Posted by FALLEN1z
this thread is rediculous. who knows how to spell and use grammar? is the rsx type s a 14,15,or 16 second car. the rsx has better potential blah blah blah.
see here's a few observations i've had here:
1. even if an rsx can run a 14.9 quarter stock, a z can run a high 13 or low 14 quarter stock. 350z:1 rsx:0
2. rsx's respond better to mods than a 350z if the z stays N/A. true but the rsx has to make up a lot of ground to even equal the z's performance. a full bolt on z will run low 13's, and unless there's some pretty radical cams and a a really aggressive tune, the rsx cannot: 350z:2 rsx:0
*i know some will ***** about this one but if you have a 300hp car that gains only a little from mods and a 200hp car that gains a lot from mods, it still has to gain 100hp before it can equal the numbers of the other car stock so that's y the z wins. the z's lack of N/A improvements arent great enough to make it loose to an rsx with the same mods.
3. 350z's dont have a potential for speed. this would almost be true if it werent faster than an s2000 (which is a faster honda than an rsx), faster than a boxter, and tied with an m3 around a racetrack....STOCK. there's probably never been an rsx in a competition like that with a z because as many have said, the z is in a differant class. 350z:3 rsx:0
4. lets look at platforms. the 350z is a front engine rear wheel drive car. the rsx is a front engine front wheel drive car. i learned that front wheel drive sux back when i was riding a tricycle but apparently some havnt. for drag racing fwd is worse due to weight transfering to the back when accelerating. when road racing front wheel drive tends to understeer and hop it's way through corners. and also what configuration is generally an ideal setup for a true sports car? that would be front engine rear wheel drive with close to 50/50 weight distribution. 350z:4 rsx:0
5. weight: the rsx is ligher than the z
350z:4 rsx:1 (good work guys)
6. the 0-60, quarter, braking, skidpad, and top speed of the z is better than the rsx. 350z:5 rsx:1
there you have it you ricer rsx driving homos, who cares if your bolt on rsx can beat a stock z, throw the same mods on a z and you'll get your *** handed to you at the strip or a track. that's like saying my twin turbo z can beat a stock ferrari f430. who really cares? which is a better car
closing comments:
that 15 year old 05 rsx dude needs to have his nap time. has he ever even driven a car? i thin in the next few years (once he actually gets his liscense) he'll learn to stop being a retard. i know when iw as 15 i wanted a civic with a big wing and a body kit, but i realized that my childish 15 year old fantasies were retarded and maybe he'll learn that he's an idiot.
the 350-in-the-z or whatever his name is guys needs to gtf out of here. he openly admitted he's here to try and annoy people.
oh and last thing for the rsx guys, there's 2 people on here who have owned both cars and while they said they loved their rsx's, they also said the z is better so there's probably the most valid opinions right there.
see here's a few observations i've had here:
1. even if an rsx can run a 14.9 quarter stock, a z can run a high 13 or low 14 quarter stock. 350z:1 rsx:0
2. rsx's respond better to mods than a 350z if the z stays N/A. true but the rsx has to make up a lot of ground to even equal the z's performance. a full bolt on z will run low 13's, and unless there's some pretty radical cams and a a really aggressive tune, the rsx cannot: 350z:2 rsx:0
*i know some will ***** about this one but if you have a 300hp car that gains only a little from mods and a 200hp car that gains a lot from mods, it still has to gain 100hp before it can equal the numbers of the other car stock so that's y the z wins. the z's lack of N/A improvements arent great enough to make it loose to an rsx with the same mods.
3. 350z's dont have a potential for speed. this would almost be true if it werent faster than an s2000 (which is a faster honda than an rsx), faster than a boxter, and tied with an m3 around a racetrack....STOCK. there's probably never been an rsx in a competition like that with a z because as many have said, the z is in a differant class. 350z:3 rsx:0
4. lets look at platforms. the 350z is a front engine rear wheel drive car. the rsx is a front engine front wheel drive car. i learned that front wheel drive sux back when i was riding a tricycle but apparently some havnt. for drag racing fwd is worse due to weight transfering to the back when accelerating. when road racing front wheel drive tends to understeer and hop it's way through corners. and also what configuration is generally an ideal setup for a true sports car? that would be front engine rear wheel drive with close to 50/50 weight distribution. 350z:4 rsx:0
5. weight: the rsx is ligher than the z
350z:4 rsx:1 (good work guys)
6. the 0-60, quarter, braking, skidpad, and top speed of the z is better than the rsx. 350z:5 rsx:1
there you have it you ricer rsx driving homos, who cares if your bolt on rsx can beat a stock z, throw the same mods on a z and you'll get your *** handed to you at the strip or a track. that's like saying my twin turbo z can beat a stock ferrari f430. who really cares? which is a better car
closing comments:
that 15 year old 05 rsx dude needs to have his nap time. has he ever even driven a car? i thin in the next few years (once he actually gets his liscense) he'll learn to stop being a retard. i know when iw as 15 i wanted a civic with a big wing and a body kit, but i realized that my childish 15 year old fantasies were retarded and maybe he'll learn that he's an idiot.
the 350-in-the-z or whatever his name is guys needs to gtf out of here. he openly admitted he's here to try and annoy people.
oh and last thing for the rsx guys, there's 2 people on here who have owned both cars and while they said they loved their rsx's, they also said the z is better so there's probably the most valid opinions right there.
02-14-2007 | 01:17 PM
#419
Originally Posted by Willie
Its funny that you took time to write that.
Here's a picture to make my post useful!
02-14-2007 | 01:28 PM
#420
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: naperville, il
Originally Posted by Willie
Its funny that you took time to write that.