Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Top 20 Most Dangerous Vehicles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 04:07 AM
  #1  
TechnoMnc's Avatar
TechnoMnc
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default Top 20 Most Dangerous Vehicles

http://finance.yahoo.com/insurance/a...erous-vehicles

[[EXCERPT]]

Top 20 Most Dangerous Vehicles
by Bengt Halvorson
Monday, July 30, 2007
provided by

Hoping to stay safe on the road? You might want to avoid certain cars.

For example, the Nissan 350Z has a death rate that's about double that of the average sports car.

But it's not for the reasons you might think. In this case, says Russ Rader, communications director for the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an organization that represents the interests of the insurance industry, the 350Z is part of a group of vehicles that tends to be driven by younger, less experienced or riskier drivers, and stands out for having high death rates, through no particular fault of the car.

"When they are in crashes," he adds, "they're particularly serious ones."

This illustrates a key point: Simply looking at the historical death rates for one particular model might not give much insight into the relative danger, or safety, of driving that vehicle. Furthermore, the most recent available federal data, interpreted by make and model by the IIHS, covers 2001 to 2004 model years in calendar years 2002 to 2005. Many models have had significant changes in safety equipment or complete redesigns since then.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 05:19 AM
  #2  
EddNog's Avatar
EddNog
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Scarsdale, NY
Default

If you look at the actual Top 20, the Z is not among them (the Stook is, though, as well as the tC and Mazda3).

-Ed
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 07:07 AM
  #3  
md350's Avatar
md350
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

Yeah, if you look at the Top 20 list, the Z isn't even there. I think its a very safe car compared to most...you just need to be able to drive.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 07:09 AM
  #4  
savvy's Avatar
savvy
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,124
Likes: 0
From: Salem, New Hampshire
Default

woohoo we win the top of the list!
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 07:20 AM
  #5  
SportBikeMike's Avatar
SportBikeMike
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default

I was in a pretty severe crash in my Z about a year and a half ago when I hit a patch of ice, slid into a ditch and side-swiped a hardwood fence. Over $13,000 damage to the car.....and I didn't have a scratch on me. There was no actual structural damage to the car- just superficial- and the guy at the bodyshop (who was in his 50s) said it was one of the best built cars he ever worked on. IMO its a well-built and relatively safe car.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 07:21 AM
  #6  
SniperHunter's Avatar
SniperHunter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Repost.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 07:38 AM
  #7  
Petey's Avatar
Petey
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Default

As we used to say in developing software, if you make your program idiot-proof, the world will just come up with bigger idiots.

The Z is a fairly dangerous car for irresponsible morons to drive.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 08:23 AM
  #8  
DavesZ#3's Avatar
DavesZ#3
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,887
Likes: 23
From: Louisiana
Default

Yet another rehash of the same old IIHS data...

https://my350z.com/forum/2003-2009-nissan-350z/289870-350z-makes-it-into-forbes-top-20-dangerous-vehicles.html
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
350Z_Al
Exterior & Interior
133
Oct 29, 2020 07:44 PM
Mattg350z
Buying/Leasing
4
Oct 2, 2015 06:51 AM
Depravity
Brakes & Suspension
14
Oct 1, 2015 04:49 PM
Tochigi_236
Feedback & Suggestions for Our Forum
8
Sep 27, 2015 03:40 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:23 PM.