Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Best RPM to shift at?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 03:09 PM
  #21  
Double21's Avatar
Double21
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Default Redline Confusion

Reading all the above posts confuses me. Do you people know your car's redline? I have a 2007 and mine is 7500 rpm redline.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 03:11 PM
  #22  
roxtarinc's Avatar
roxtarinc
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
From: Ridgefield, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Double21
Reading all the above posts confuses me. Do you people know your car's redline? I have a 2007 and mine is 7500 rpm redline.
some of us arent cool enough to have 07's
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #23  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Double21
Reading all the above posts confuses me. Do you people know your car's redline? I have a 2007 and mine is 7500 rpm redline.
You are the man!
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 03:28 PM
  #24  
Nismospeed4life's Avatar
Nismospeed4life
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 1
From: In your Mind!
Default When in doubt

When in doubt, let Alberto show you how. Enjoy the following vid:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXVexQ2q554
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 07:11 PM
  #25  
Double21's Avatar
Double21
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Default You are the man!!!

You are nothing but the man Alberto!!!
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 07:53 AM
  #26  
kacz07's Avatar
kacz07
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 4
From: NJ
Default

wouldn't u need a dyno to know for sure? esp if you mod it out
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 07:55 AM
  #27  
InSaNeZ's Avatar
InSaNeZ
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

I usually shift around 3-4k.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 02:29 PM
  #28  
GA_VQ's Avatar
GA_VQ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Around
Default

I thought the point was to shift at the peak of the horsepower curve because that is what is accelereting your car. So that would make the stock DE shiftpoint around 6200, right?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 03:04 PM
  #29  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by GA_VQ
I thought the point was to shift at the peak of the horsepower curve because that is what is accelereting your car. So that would make the stock DE shiftpoint around 6200, right?
Yes peak horsepower is a consideration. But more important is where are you coming into the next gear? 3,000 RPM? 5,000 RPM? If you push the motor past peak horsepower, you can come into the next gear a bit higher.

1st gear is a bit unique. If traction is poor, I will often short shift 1st. No point sitting there with the tires spinning.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 03:25 PM
  #30  
SniperHunter's Avatar
SniperHunter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by GA_VQ
I thought the point was to shift at the peak of the horsepower curve because that is what is accelereting your car. So that would make the stock DE shiftpoint around 6200, right?
You'd still want to redline, because the engine will continue making that peak power for the next 300RPMs - there isn't a catastrophic drop in power.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 04:08 PM
  #31  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Arnold K.
You'd still want to redline, because the engine will continue making that peak power for the next 300RPMs - there isn't a catastrophic drop in power.
Plus the mechanical advantage of the lower gear more than makes up for the drop in torque.

Plenty of good answers!
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 04:38 PM
  #32  
Chad68's Avatar
Chad68
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,171
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default

6,999 Rpm.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 11:23 AM
  #33  
GA_VQ's Avatar
GA_VQ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Around
Default

Originally Posted by Chad68
6,999 Rpm.
I was thinking 6,599
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 09:19 AM
  #34  
banshee's Avatar
banshee
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth
Default

What about driving at high (above 5K) rpms for extended periods of time... As in going over mountains... Is that terrible for the car?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 09:32 AM
  #35  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by banshee
What about driving at high (above 5K) rpms for extended periods of time... As in going over mountains... Is that terrible for the car?
The highest point in Georgia is Brasstown Bald: elevation 4,784 feet. That's not a mountain. Its a hill.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 09:33 AM
  #36  
phat04350z's Avatar
phat04350z
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jersey
Default

If you shift at redline from 1st be prepared for the rear to spin. Feather the gas so you limit it. Daily driving i shift at like 2500-3000K
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 02:28 PM
  #37  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by banshee
What about driving at high (above 5K) rpms for extended periods of time... As in going over mountains... Is that terrible for the car?
Any rpm below red line can be maintained non-stop for hours with no detrimental effect to the engine or any other part of the car. Below red line, anything goes! Aha!

mpg will suck, but the sound track will be sweet!
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 02:43 PM
  #38  
NGZ's Avatar
NGZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,604
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Aren't there situations where you'd want to shift around the peak in the torque curve, rather than the peak in the horsepower curve?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 02:58 PM
  #39  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by NGZ
Aren't there situations where you'd want to shift around the peak in the torque curve, rather than the peak in the horsepower curve?
Better fuel economy when short shifting ?

That was an old technique used when cars had loads of torque and crappy low grip tires. They were traction limited. It is not the case anymore.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 11:48 AM
  #40  
schlack's Avatar
schlack
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: philly
Default

Daily driving I shift around 3.5K RPM, spirited driving I shift around 5K RPM, but I'm not racing and I'm not on the track. I'm not sure where my torque peaks but it feels like around 4.5K RPM?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:15 AM.